|
Post by IdahoBoy on Oct 24, 2006 18:03:54 GMT -5
I nominate Amac for the worst judge candidate ever.
|
|
|
Post by Pirate VB Fan on Oct 24, 2006 18:34:38 GMT -5
A Rabbi and a Priest went into a HS gym...
|
|
|
Post by Thrill of the 'ville on Oct 24, 2006 19:48:52 GMT -5
I nominate Amac for the worst judge candidate ever. Time to start working on my speech: I'd like to thank the academy....
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Oct 24, 2006 20:24:41 GMT -5
I nominate Amac for the worst judge candidate ever. Time to start working on my speech: I'd like to thank the academy.... There is no academy, doof.
|
|
|
Post by Thrill of the 'ville on Oct 24, 2006 20:48:12 GMT -5
Time to start working on my speech: I'd like to thank the academy.... There is no academy, doof. I'd like to thank Wolfgang for pointing out there is no academy...
|
|
|
Post by IdahoBoy on Oct 24, 2006 23:00:02 GMT -5
Ya haven't won yet, no speech for nominations...
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on Oct 24, 2006 23:37:09 GMT -5
Because, I win.
|
|
|
Post by cbrown1709 on Oct 24, 2006 23:42:17 GMT -5
You so wish that was you..lol
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on Oct 25, 2006 0:13:01 GMT -5
You so wish that was you..lol Trent Reznor? nah. I could use his fortune but have little use for his fame.
|
|
|
Post by romeo on Oct 26, 2006 12:35:56 GMT -5
Wolfgang, I want an award for creating a poll with the least participation. Nay, I demand it. I deserve it, by golly, and I will take it in cash. Thanks in advance. I can actually volunteer to distribute the awards, but I'm warning you: no one better get mad at me. This is a thankless job. I'm the focal point so obviously, the easy target for those of you who didn't place 1st or 2nd place and felt shafted somehow. I don't want anyone thinking: It's time for Payback, Retribution! On second thought, the thought of me judging anything on this forum blows. Never mind.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Oct 26, 2006 13:23:51 GMT -5
I'm sorry but an award like that is too objective. For you example of Award with Lowest Participation, one need only look at the number of responses and views to determine the winner. That is too easy and hence, unacceptable. All awards should be based on subjective criteria, i.e., your gut feeling, instincts, resonance, so as to generate controversy among the peeps. And it's more funner. (note: the word "more" should not be used with word "funner." Thank you.)
Thanks, in advance.
|
|