|
Post by stanfordvb on May 3, 2019 0:03:03 GMT -5
Dude, you have only yourself to blame for this faux charade. Seriously! This is not a thread that needs BS drama infusions. Many here are knowledgeable, experienced, & wait for indications of upcoming recruits being approved via the escargot pace (read labyrinthine process) of Stanford Admissions. No need for u to keep this thread 'lively'! How does anyone know who says BS then. I must be the only person on here who appreciates everyones ideas and their sources as I can't recall anyone who has stated who they get their info from out in the open. Even if stanfordvb is lying...who cares. This is a website to post opinions and what could be happening. And by saying that his sources say a player may be looking somewhere else then Stanford is not BS, just what his sources are saying. Thank you. You may be angered or disagree with info I share but what my sources tell me I put on here to inform everyone of posssibilities. No one really knows who’s sources are right or wrong until a player commits so calling everything I say BS and saying that I’m lying about who I know are very baseless claims that have no proof and just what someone thinks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2019 0:50:21 GMT -5
How does anyone know who says BS then. I must be the only person on here who appreciates everyones ideas and their sources as I can't recall anyone who has stated who they get their info from out in the open. Even if stanfordvb is lying...who cares. This is a website to post opinions and what could be happening. And by saying that his sources say a player may be looking somewhere else then Stanford is not BS, just what his sources are saying. Thank you. You may be angered or disagree with info I share but what my sources tell me I put on here to inform everyone of posssibilities. No one really knows who’s sources are right or wrong until a player commits so calling everything I say BS and saying that I’m lying about who I know are very baseless claims that have no proof and just what someone thinks. 1) False/fake rumors are not "info"; 2) It is up to you to do the vetting of your 'sources'; 3) I was echoing the opinions of numerous posters; 4) Sure you two are not one-and-the-same? Writing 'styles' are nearly identical ("vbstan123" of 24 postings; an alter ego?); 5) A wise old saying: "engage brain before putting mouth (fingers) in gear"!
|
|
|
Post by jengal on May 3, 2019 1:31:05 GMT -5
Is there an inherent virtue to using a 6-2? Am a relatively new fan and only remember one year Stanford using it and the season turned around after they went away from it. In this specific case, if your current setter in a 5-1 wins two out of three national championships, is there a weakness that you can shore up (and/or improvement that you can make) with a switch to a 6-2? My naive observation is that in general the 6-2 gives you three attackers up front consistently. But Stanford seems to be doing just fine without that. As I said that personally I would prefer 5-1 better with 1 quarterback to run the team. But 6-2 can have some benefits if you have so many good players who are vying for playing time and you want to keep them happy to be on the court. You will also have 3 offensive hitters at all time in the front. I think Hambly will probably go with 5-1 which is a good choice. Gray has led the team to win 2 out of 3 national championships. Why changed it when it worked, right? I also think they will run a 5-1. The difference in the way setters set the ball is a factor, as well as leadership. Of course, there are other aspects such as blocking, but I think Jenna is a pretty good blocking setter. She is good at all of the traits...if it's not broke, don't fix it!
|
|
|
Post by vbstan123 on May 3, 2019 9:48:16 GMT -5
Thank you. You may be angered or disagree with info I share but what my sources tell me I put on here to inform everyone of posssibilities. No one really knows who’s sources are right or wrong until a player commits so calling everything I say BS and saying that I’m lying about who I know are very baseless claims that have no proof and just what someone thinks. 1) False/fake rumors are not "info"; 2) It is up to you to do the vetting of your 'sources'; 3) I was echoing the opinions of numerous posters; 4) Sure you two are not one-and-the-same? Writing 'styles' are nearly identical ("vbstan123" of 24 postings; an alter ego?); 5) A wise old saying: "engage brain before putting mouth (fingers) in gear"! Not stanfordvb but just someone whose tired of ppl attacking stanfordvb (and everyone else who gets criticism) even though some people have no idea abt what they know. How do uk these are false/fake rumors? Oh wait. You don't. There is no point at all for attacking someone when you have zero info abt the idea.
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on May 3, 2019 10:09:34 GMT -5
Thank you. You may be angered or disagree with info I share but what my sources tell me I put on here to inform everyone of posssibilities. No one really knows who’s sources are right or wrong until a player commits so calling everything I say BS and saying that I’m lying about who I know are very baseless claims that have no proof and just what someone thinks. 1) False/fake rumors are not "info"; 2) It is up to you to do the vetting of your 'sources'; 3) I was echoing the opinions of numerous posters; 4) Sure you two are not one-and-the-same? Writing 'styles' are nearly identical ("vbstan123" of 24 postings; an alter ego?); 5) A wise old saying: "engage brain before putting mouth (fingers) in gear"! ok then please prove what I said was wrong. HOW do u know it’s false info. Honestly. You’re haute dating I’m putting out false info and you have no reason why it’s false or hoe you know it is...
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on May 3, 2019 10:11:28 GMT -5
1) False/fake rumors are not "info"; 2) It is up to you to do the vetting of your 'sources'; 3) I was echoing the opinions of numerous posters; 4) Sure you two are not one-and-the-same? Writing 'styles' are nearly identical ("vbstan123" of 24 postings; an alter ego?); 5) A wise old saying: "engage brain before putting mouth (fingers) in gear"! ok then please prove what I said was wrong. HOW do u know it’s false info. Honestly. You’re saying I’m putting out false info and you have no reason why it’s false or how you know it is...
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on May 3, 2019 10:16:59 GMT -5
I mean just the fact that he used the word “decommit” and made it seem like it was so shocking that she was abandoning some commitment that wasn’t real is all we needed to dismiss it.... saying you want to go to a school is not binding and I’m glad that she is considering all her options while UNCOMITTED. I mean I’m pretty sure everyone could see any potential recruit rethink their decisions, and making it some whole spectacle was unnecessary. cmon, just let it go already.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2019 12:36:29 GMT -5
I didn’t mention their name nor their year. Keeps things fun. Like when everyone was guessing in the Nebraska thread about an MB transfer, or everyone was guessing where Barnes was gonna go, keeps the thread bumping nahemsayin Besides the end of your post being unintelligible, these are Your Own Words, Gavin! As many have been trying to reason with you; take this attention-seeking elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by cardinal22 on May 3, 2019 13:38:46 GMT -5
Okay okay everyone lets stop going after stanfordvb. To change the topic... I notice they updated their roster but no Xu isnt there? maybe they haven't finished the roster?
|
|
|
Post by cardinal22 on May 3, 2019 13:41:28 GMT -5
and has Kipp listed as OH
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on May 3, 2019 14:09:45 GMT -5
Okay okay everyone lets stop going after stanfordvb. To change the topic... I notice they updated their roster but no Xu isnt there? maybe they haven't finished the roster? Xu is on there.
|
|
|
Post by vbstan123 on May 3, 2019 15:09:02 GMT -5
I didn’t mention their name nor their year. Keeps things fun. Like when everyone was guessing in the Nebraska thread about an MB transfer, or everyone was guessing where Barnes was gonna go, keeps the thread bumping nahemsayin Besides the end of your post being unintelligible, these are Your Own Words, Gavin! As many have been trying to reason with you; take this attention-seeking elsewhere. How is this attention seeking? Please tell me becasuse I understand privacy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2019 15:22:08 GMT -5
Okay okay everyone lets stop going after stanfordvb. To change the topic... I notice they updated their roster but no Xu isnt there? maybe they haven't finished the roster? Fifth down from the top of the roster (will be wearing #6).
|
|
|
Post by hammer on May 3, 2019 16:05:32 GMT -5
Okay okay everyone lets stop going after stanfordvb. To change the topic... I notice they updated their roster but no Xu isnt there? maybe they haven't finished the roster? Xu is on there. May I humbly submit that this could be one of the finest assemblages of collegiate talent in the history of the sport. Perhaps, also notable, is the fact I was able to use the word assemblages in a VolleyTalk thread.
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on May 3, 2019 16:13:04 GMT -5
May I humbly submit that this could be one of the finest assemblages of collegiate talent in the history of the sport. Perhaps, also notable, is the fact I was able to use the word assemblages in a VolleyTalk thread. When's the last time a team had two top recruiting classes at the same time?
|
|