|
Post by southie on Sept 11, 2014 21:58:21 GMT -5
with White at number 4, Texas has their second group of top 5 recruits. 1) Webster, McCage 2) Bell, Faucette 3) Adams, Doris, Engle 4) Baker, White 5) McNeil, Eckerman, Bedart-Ghani Furthermore, they are just one 10th ranked player away from their second group of top 10 recruits. Hats off the Elliot WHY DOES HE ONLY HAVE ONE TITLE Your act is so old.
|
|
|
Post by chisovnik on Sept 11, 2014 23:04:14 GMT -5
with White at number 4, Texas has their second group of top 5 recruits. 1) Webster, McCage 2) Bell, Faucette 3) Adams, Doris, Engle 4) Baker, White 5) McNeil, Eckerman, Bedart-Ghani Furthermore, they are just one 10th ranked player away from their second group of top 10 recruits. Hats off the Elliot WHY DOES HE ONLY HAVE ONE TITLE Not a good coach.
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 11, 2014 23:09:37 GMT -5
with White at number 4, Texas has their second group of top 5 recruits. 1) Webster, McCage 2) Bell, Faucette 3) Adams, Doris, Engle 4) Baker, White 5) McNeil, Eckerman, Bedart-Ghani Furthermore, they are just one 10th ranked player away from their second group of top 10 recruits. Hats off the Elliot WHY DOES HE ONLY HAVE ONE TITLE Because despite on paper talent second to none, there is almost always a team out there better than Texas. It's as simple as that. Just because you have a ton of paper talent, doesn't always mean you are the best team. And, to be frank, generally the teams that do end up winning the title have top on paper talent too. In terms of pure talent Texas has equals...none superior, but equals. I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest that those equals would be winning titles too, namely Penn State. How many top 10 recruits has PSU landed in the last decade? Answer, A LOT.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2014 23:11:34 GMT -5
WHY DOES HE ONLY HAVE ONE TITLE Because despite on paper talent second to none, there is almost always a team out there better than Texas. It's as simple as that. Just because you have a ton of paper talent, doesn't always mean you are the best team. And, to be frank, generally the teams that do end up winning the title have top on paper talent too. No one has had more talent than Texas. The problem has been the coaching. Give it up.
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Sept 11, 2014 23:12:37 GMT -5
with White at number 4, Texas has their second group of top 5 recruits. 1) Webster, McCage 2) Bell, Faucette 3) Adams, Doris, Engle 4) Baker, White 5) McNeil, Eckerman, Bedart-Ghani Furthermore, they are just one 10th ranked player away from their second group of top 10 recruits. Hats off the Elliot WHY DOES HE ONLY HAVE ONE TITLE Because he ran into penn States juggernaut team for four years. 2013 he should of won, but the badgers proved to much for him
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2014 23:14:01 GMT -5
WHY DOES HE ONLY HAVE ONE TITLE Because he ran into penn States juggernaut team for four years. No. He ran into Penn State's juggernaut coach.
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Sept 11, 2014 23:17:14 GMT -5
Because he ran into penn States juggernaut team for four years. No. He ran into Penn State's juggernaut coach. I don't think there is a debate on what coach is better, BUT jerrit is not a horrible coach. They have multiple final fours under there belt, but just like Stanford teams, with klineman, Barboza, lichtman, Ailes, foluke, not even they could win a title
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2014 0:32:30 GMT -5
No. He ran into Penn State's juggernaut coach. I don't think there is a debate on what coach is better, BUT jerrit is not a horrible coach. They have multiple final fours under there belt, but just like Stanford teams, with klineman, Barboza, lichtman, Ailes, foluke, not even they could win a title Those Stanford teams didn't have the same amount of talent that Jerritt has had over the past six years, and that 2008 class played in a much more challenging era of college volleyball. That isn't debatable. No one has had more talent than Texas. If Final Fours are the goal, he's doing great.
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Sept 12, 2014 0:38:24 GMT -5
Wasn't Alexa Dreyer (Vision/UCLA) supposed to be pretty good? Is she not a 2015? I assume DeSales' injury kept her out of top 100.
|
|
|
Post by Wiswell on Sept 12, 2014 8:51:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by southie on Sept 12, 2014 9:08:31 GMT -5
I don't think there is a debate on what coach is better, BUT jerrit is not a horrible coach. They have multiple final fours under there belt, but just like Stanford teams, with klineman, Barboza, lichtman, Ailes, foluke, not even they could win a title Those Stanford teams didn't have the same amount of talent that Jerritt has had over the past six years, and that 2008 class played in a much more challenging era of college volleyball. That isn't debatable. No one has had more talent than Texas. If Final Fours are the goal, he's doing great. You always conveniently leave out all the injuries Texas has endured just about every season but a couple. But, that's just who you are . . .
|
|
|
Post by rainbowbadger on Sept 12, 2014 9:34:04 GMT -5
I think Punzel is okay. This is Tawa's copyright statement: © 2014 PrepVolleyball.com. Do not reproduce, except in the print media, without express permission.Really he doesn't want people copy/pasting his lists here on VT or on other internet discussion sites.
|
|
|
Post by gobruins on Sept 12, 2014 15:22:40 GMT -5
with White at number 4, Texas has their second group of top 5 recruits. 1) Webster, McCage 2) Bell, Faucette 3) Adams, Doris, Engle 4) Baker, White 5) McNeil, Eckerman, Bedart-Ghani Furthermore, they are just one 10th ranked player away from their second group of top 10 recruits. Hats off the Elliot WHY DOES HE ONLY HAVE ONE TITLE That is still one title more than most coaches have.
|
|
|
Post by Xplaya on Sept 12, 2014 15:28:45 GMT -5
So how would you initially rank the classes? Oregon, Wisconsin, Cal, Texas, Purdue, Iowa St, USC, Illinois, Louisville, Arizona and UCSB seem to have done some really good work. Back to back top ten classes for Oregon and Cal???
|
|
|
Post by spikerthemovie on Sept 12, 2014 17:00:43 GMT -5
Those Stanford teams didn't have the same amount of talent that Jerritt has had over the past six years, and that 2008 class played in a much more challenging era of college volleyball. That isn't debatable. No one has had more talent than Texas. If Final Fours are the goal, he's doing great. You always conveniently leave out all the injuries Texas has endured just about every season but a couple. But, that's just who you are . . . Injuries along the lines of the ones that forced Wisconsin to start a 5-7 outside hitter when they beat Texas at the final four? (My point being: Every team has them.)
|
|