|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Sept 20, 2014 14:48:20 GMT -5
Standings:
(10) Arizona 2-0
(5) Oregon 2-0
(3) Stanford 2-0
(4) Washington 2-0
(12) ASU 1-1
(21) Colorado 1-1
(24) OSU 1-1
(10) UCLA 1-1
(40) Cal 0-2
(6) USC 0-2
(23) Utah 0-2
(38) WSU 0-2
(Sept 22 pablo rankings)
==================
Head-to-head among favorites
UCLA: (1-0) [Remaining: @UW, Ore, @Stan, UW, Stan, @Ore, @ASU, USC]
ASU: (1-0) [Remaining: Stan, UW, @Ore, @Stan, Ore, @UW, UCLA]
Oregon: (0-0) [Remaining: @Stan, UW, @UCLA, @USC, ASU, Stan, @UW, @ASU, UCLA, USC]
Stanford: (0-0) [Remaining: Ore, @ASU, UCLA, USC, @Ore, ASU, @USC, @UCLA, @UW]
Washington: (0-0) [Remaining: USC, UCLA, @Ore, @ASU, @USC, @UCLA, Ore, ASU, Stan]
USC: (0-2) [Remaining: @UW, Ore, @Stan, UW, Stan, @Ore, @UCLA]
Losses by these teams to others:
ASU: 1 (@Zona)
UCLA: 1 (@Zona)
==================
This week's matches (Pacific times)
Tue:
6pm Cal@Stan
8pm UCLA@USC
Wed:
7:30pm OSU@Ore, ASU@AZ, WSU@UW
Thur:
6pm Utah@Col
Fri:
6pm ASU@USC
7pm WSU@Stan
8pm UW@Cal, AZ@UCLA
Sat:
6pm Utah@OSU
7pm Col@Ore
Bold is pablo favorite.
==================
Week 2 schedule:
LA@Wash, Arizona@Mountains, Oregon@BayArea
|
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 20, 2014 14:58:40 GMT -5
I would add UCLA to your watch list. They have a strong enough SOS to grab a seed if they don't lose few matches against the bottom 6, and can snag a win or two against the top 6
|
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Sept 20, 2014 14:59:49 GMT -5
I would add UCLA to your watch list. They have a strong enough SOS to grab a seed if they don't lose few matches against the bottom 6, and can snag a win or two against the top 6 I thought about it. Maybe I will. |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 20, 2014 15:08:36 GMT -5
Stanford and Washington are set up to take two top 4 seeds this season, aided by the fact that they only play each other once. Oregon also could if they lose few matches, but they have to play all the big programs twice this year so that will work against them.
|
|
|
|
Post by psumaui on Sept 20, 2014 15:14:48 GMT -5
As with the BIG Ten, Let the beatings begin! This is where they start to beat each other up!
|
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Sept 20, 2014 15:19:52 GMT -5
As with the BIG Ten, Let the beatings begin! This is where they start to beat each other up! Virtually any team top 10 would have that hitting oercentage against the teams PSU has played |
|
|
|
Post by psumaui on Sept 20, 2014 15:28:40 GMT -5
As with the BIG Ten, Let the beatings begin! This is where they start to beat each other up! Virtually any team top 10 would have that hitting oercentage against the teams PSU has played What's that have to do with the price of tea in China? |
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Sept 20, 2014 15:30:59 GMT -5
Virtually any team top 10 would have that hitting oercentage against the teams PSU has played What's that have to do with the price of tea in China? Sorry I quotted it in thw wrong thread. It was meant to quote something like "PSU is hitting .390." My apologies lol |
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Sept 20, 2014 15:34:00 GMT -5
Right now, it looks like it could be a two-horse race, between UW and Stanford, with the Huskies with the edge, due to only seeing the Cardinal in Seattle. I think UCLA could be in it for third. USC is looking like a baseball team with lots of hitting, but sketchy pitching backed by a poor defense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xplaya on Sept 20, 2014 16:29:19 GMT -5
Standings: (13) Arizona 0-0 (12) ASU 0-0 (35) Cal 0-0 (22) Colorado 0-0 (5) Oregon 0-0 (28) OSU 0-0 (2) Stanford 0-0 (14) UCLA 0-0 (6) USC 0-0 (20) Utah 0-0 (4) Washington 0-0 (39) WSU 0-0 (Sept 15 pablo rankings) (will update after 9/22) Head-to-head: This year I will start by tracking ASU, Stanford, Washington, USC, and Oregon Losses by these teams to others: None yet! ================== This week's matches (Pacific times) Tue: 6pm Cal@Stan 8pm UCLA@USC Wed: 7:30pm OSU@Ore, ASU@AZ, WSU@UW Thur: 6pm Utah@Col Fri: 6pm ASU@USC 7pm WSU@Stan 8pm UW@Cal, AZ@UCLA Sat: 6pm Utah@OSU 7pm Col@Ore ================== Week 2 schedule: LA@Wash, Arizona@Mountains, Oregon@BayArea rough start for Cal... |
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Sept 20, 2014 18:09:39 GMT -5
Right now, it looks like it could be a two-horse race, between UW and Stanford, with the Huskies with the edge, due to only seeing the Cardinal in Seattle. I think UCLA could be in it for third. USC is looking like a baseball team with lots of hitting, but sketchy pitching backed by a poor defense. How I think the standing will go 1. Stanford 2. Washington 3. Oregon 4. Ucla 5. Usc 6 asu 7. Colorado 8. Arizona 9. utah 10. Cal 11. Oregon state 12. Washington state. |
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Sept 21, 2014 13:04:45 GMT -5
What the hell is going on with Colorado? They have way too much talent to have 4 losses against the slate of teams they played. Looks like they're bouncing between setters/systems, and Austin hasn't played much (or well), but if she were injured I wouldn't think she would have made it into games all 4 weekends.
|
|
|
|
Post by kahusancali on Sept 21, 2014 13:16:15 GMT -5
My prediction
1. Stanford
2. Oregon
3. Ucla
5. asu
7. Colorado
8. Arizona
9. utah
10. Cal
11. Oregon state
12. Washington state.
11. Washington
12. USC
*I put Washington and USC in the bottom of the totem pole because I've never seen their games online. Until then they're in my bottom two.
|
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Sept 21, 2014 13:20:45 GMT -5
My prediction 1. Stanford 2. Oregon 3. Ucla 5. asu 7. Colorado 8. Arizona 9. utah 10. Cal 11. Oregon state 12. Washington state. 11. Washington 12. USC *I put Washington and USC in the bottom of the totem pole because I've never seen their games online. Until then they're in my bottom two. That's different. |
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Sept 21, 2014 15:28:32 GMT -5
My prediction 1. Stanford 2. Oregon 3. Ucla 5. asu 7. Colorado 8. Arizona 9. utah 10. Cal 11. Oregon state 12. Washington state. 11. Washington 12. USC *I put Washington and USC in the bottom of the totem pole because I've never seen their games online. Until then they're in my bottom two. I've never seen Australia, but even so, I'm pretty sure it really is there. |
|
