|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 22, 2014 22:38:31 GMT -5
You can tell whenever Arizona plays on the Pac12 Networks who the announcers' obvious favorite player is. Yeah -- Vansant. Somehow she became a discussion topic for a while.
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Oct 22, 2014 22:43:54 GMT -5
14-9 Oregon. Kingdon with back-to-back blocks trying to start a run. IMO, she's one of the better LS blockers in the conference, kinda hurts that Rubio's moving her to the right some where she doesn't look as comfortable.
15-10 Back to back service errors for Arizona. Ducks not as focused, might let Arizona back into this
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Oct 22, 2014 22:46:46 GMT -5
I feel like Oregon is trying to give this set away and Arizona decided they would rather serve into the net. 19-13 Ducks
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 22, 2014 22:47:30 GMT -5
"That sums it up right there."
Kingdon serve falls so short that Snuka bumps it up to the net.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 22, 2014 22:50:38 GMT -5
Announcer just said, "When this set is over, we'll be transferring you to the Cal/USC match." I guess he already decided Oregon was going to sweep.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 22, 2014 22:51:36 GMT -5
Match point
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 22, 2014 22:52:08 GMT -5
Sweep on a hitting error.
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on Oct 22, 2014 22:52:27 GMT -5
Announcer just said, "When this set is over, we'll be transferring you to the Cal/USC match." I guess he already decided Oregon was going to sweep. Well, to be fair, pretty much all of us were thinking the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by blastingsand on Oct 22, 2014 22:55:25 GMT -5
They started the match by saying this might go 5. And then when broadcasting switched over the SC/Cal announcers said they never saw it coming. I'm guessing they don't watch matches outside the ones they work.
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Oct 22, 2014 22:55:53 GMT -5
25-19 sweep. I expect the match in Tucson will be much more competitive. A shame because the first ten minutes were pretty entertaining.
Benson was player of the match IMO. Finished with 17 digs and was covering a ton of court passing dimes. She also made so many digs early in the first that sucked the life out of Arizona and contributed to their error fest.
Serving was very good. That was a liability earlier but we've had quite a few solid serving matches lately.
Brenner 11 k, .375 Bettendorf 11 k, .259 Shebby 9 k, .304 Scott 20 assists, 2 aces and team hit 295
Kingdon 13 k, pulled herself out of the negative in the 3rd set
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Oct 22, 2014 22:56:55 GMT -5
They started the match by saying this might go 5. And then when broadcasting switched over the SC/Cal announcers said they never saw it coming. I'm guessing they don't watch matches outside the ones they work. I didn't see that coming. Terrible performance by Arizona. Ducks were solid, esp. in Set 2.... but a team with a pulse would have at least made Oregon sweat its lack of focus in Set 3.
|
|
|
Post by herdmentality on Oct 22, 2014 22:58:57 GMT -5
That was a dominating performance by Oregon
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 22, 2014 23:00:56 GMT -5
How many nights are you going to see Kingdon make multiple backrow attack foot faults?
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Oct 22, 2014 23:13:48 GMT -5
Didn't even look like PAC-12 VB.
|
|
|
Post by wonderwarthog79 on Oct 22, 2014 23:23:00 GMT -5
Washington's blockers were able to get out on Oregon's pin hitters. Arizona's haven't. In the battle between the quicks and the bigs, the quicks are winning. Mostly because Washington's serving put much more pressure on the Ducks' passing than Arizona's did. Can't run a fast offense if the passes aren't pinpoint, and UW's block is the best in the conference.
|
|