|
|
Post by rubyredslippers on Sept 18, 2004 20:01:38 GMT -5
finally. I knew they could do it. We love you Bruins!
|
|
|
|
Post by tito99 on Sept 18, 2004 20:03:40 GMT -5
box score:
## UCLA K E TA Hit% A DG BS-BA| ## BY K E TA Hit% A DG BS-BA
1 RINGEL,Bri 20 3 44 .386 0 5 0-2 | 5 RICHARDS,L 9 5 23 .174 44 7 1-0
2 BARBA,Nanc 1 1 2 .000 0 1 0-0 | 6 METCALF,Li 6 2 21 .190 3 9 2-4
9 CARTER,Kat 4 6 19 -105 0 2 0-0 | 7 WILSON,Kim 8 5 28 .107 2 9 0-1
10 MURPHY,Bry 8 3 27 .185 0 5 0-3 | 9 BROWN,Lexi 11 6 25 .200 0 7 1-1
11 LYMAN,Colb 7 3 21 .190 6 5 0-3 | 10 LOTT,Erica 15 7 32 .250 1 5 0-2
12 McFARLAND, 6 1 9 .556 47 5 0-2 | 14 HARTSOCK,L 12 3 22 .409 0 1 0-6
7 MERIWETHER 9 1 18 .444 0 2 1-5 | 1 GOODMAN,Ch 0 1 1-1000 0 1 0-0
15 CULLEN,Hea 4 2 14 .143 0 4 0-1 | 15 SCHLAUDER, 0 0 0 .000 0 0 0-0
20 FINE,Jessi 0 0 0 .000 0 4 0-0 | 16 EVANS,Lind 0 0 0 .000 2 8 0-0
23 ZARTMAN,Ch 0 0 0 .000 4 12 0-0 | 17 POWELL,Sta 0 0 0 .000 3 9 0-0
Totals.... 59 20 .253 57 45 9.0 | 20 JUDKINS,Je 0 0 0 .000 0 0 0-0
| 21 KEMP,Annie 0 0 1 .000 0 3 0-0
| Totals.... 61 29 .209 55 59 11.0
|
ATTACK/GAME - UCLA ATTACK/GAME - BY Score-by-Game
Game K E TA Pct Game K E TA Pct
1 13 8 35 .143 1 17 4 34 .382 <*> UCLA.... 24 30 31 22
2 15 5 44 .227 2 18 10 45 .178 BY...... 30 26 29 11
3 20 5 55 .273 3 19 6 48 .271
4 11 2 20 .450 4 7 9 26 -.077
they shot themselves in the foot in the fourth game...noble effort though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Island on Sept 18, 2004 20:06:59 GMT -5
>-(Gorf)-<[} link=board=general&thread=1095548497&start=43#2 date=1095555611] Those are balls? I thought they were pom-poms. What if they are? Wanna make something of it  Yeah, they might need to be a little brighter. |
|
|
|
Post by tito99 on Sept 18, 2004 20:07:39 GMT -5
ok the formatting is weird...i don't know how to fix that...
but overall ucla hit just .253 to byu's .209
you think maybe the parity has to do with a lack of consistent terminators out there in general? it seems like there are a lot of solid players, but no one that's been dominant (except stacy gordon, and ogonna nnamani).
maybe it just feels like there are fewer big name players this year because there were so many that graduated last year...
|
|
|
|
Post by rubyredslippers on Sept 18, 2004 20:49:21 GMT -5
Although, I am a bit biased I think that they should put Rachell Johnson out there. She couldn't have done any worse than some of their other fresh/soph players on the ucla side. Give her a chance!
|
|
|
|
Post by cbrown1709 on Sept 19, 2004 1:22:51 GMT -5
Just wondering, is Laurne Richards a very, and i mean very, offensive minded setter? I was looking at their stats and couldn't believe she had 25 attack attempts. I know that aren't running a 6-2, just seems like alot of attempts. I bet she will be running her but off Monday at practice with 6 service errors also.
|
|
