|
Post by simpleton on Sept 7, 2017 19:07:41 GMT -5
Wow. If these names are dropping now I don't know how people can say this isn't a deep class. #95, #79, #77,#76. These are really, really talented players. Wow.
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 7, 2017 19:19:28 GMT -5
Yes, I think TCU is getting a great player in #76.... a steady presence on a very physical club team, and she actually attacks the ball closer to her jump touch, unlike some of these other players that may touch higher but don't actually play higher (yet). I know there are some Pac-12 recruits in that starting line up, one likely a top 10 player but I was always most impressed with #76 everytime I watched them.
|
|
|
Post by simpleton on Sept 7, 2017 19:25:53 GMT -5
I couldn't agree more. Have watched her for years. Was always athletic but has developed into a tremendous player. Incredibly smooth and imho the best player on a team that is stacked with talent. So smoooth!
|
|
|
Post by curiousvolleyballdad on Sept 7, 2017 19:57:35 GMT -5
Wow. If these names are dropping now I don't know how people can say this isn't a deep class. #95, #79, #77,#76. These are really, really talented players. Wow. Hopefully now posters will stop saying that. This class is very deep.
|
|
|
Post by ProfessorPlum on Sept 7, 2017 21:47:19 GMT -5
Wow. If these names are dropping now I don't know how people can say this isn't a deep class. #95, #79, #77,#76. These are really, really talented players. Wow. Hopefully now posters will stop saying that. This class is very deep. Yes! Those 4 players and their PVB ranking should really shut up all the pundents!!! Haha. Relax Dads! It's the greatest class of all time!
|
|
|
Post by simpleton on Sept 7, 2017 22:01:04 GMT -5
Sorry to disappoint professor but I don't have a dog in this fight. But I have watched these girls and they are spectacular, and if this is where they rank - this class sure as hell isnt shallow.
|
|
|
Post by vbfamily on Sept 7, 2017 22:39:47 GMT -5
Yes, I think TCU is getting a great player in #76.... a steady presence on a very physical club team, and she actually attacks the ball closer to her jump touch, unlike some of these other players that may touch higher but don't actually play higher (yet). I know there are some Pac-12 recruits in that starting line up, one likely a top 10 player but I was always most impressed with #76 everytime I watched them. Loved watching this kid play this season. Never knew her before, but she impresses!
|
|
|
Post by vbnerd on Sept 8, 2017 12:16:59 GMT -5
So why is Allyson Cathey not going to WKU anymore?
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Sept 8, 2017 17:17:21 GMT -5
70. USC 69. Washington 68. Notre Dame 67. USC 66. Dayton 65. San Diego 64. Rice 63. BYU 62. Kansas 61. UCLA
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 8, 2017 17:20:10 GMT -5
69. Washington
that is surprising...she lacks an arm, but this seems awfully low.
|
|
|
Post by curiousvolleyballdad on Sept 8, 2017 17:23:24 GMT -5
69. Washington that is surprising...she lacks an arm, but this seems awfully low. I would have to agree she is awfully low for someone who has successfully played up.
|
|
bluepenquin
Hall of Fame
4-Time VolleyTalk Poster of the Year (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016), All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016)
Posts: 12,447
|
Post by bluepenquin on Sept 8, 2017 17:23:52 GMT -5
That wasn't the order I was expecting for the 3 Kansas recruits. I was expecting the order to be 79, 80, 62 - goes to show what little I know.
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 8, 2017 17:27:40 GMT -5
69. Washington that is surprising...she lacks an arm, but this seems awfully low. I would have to agree she is awfully low for someone who has successfully played up. whatevs....perhaps the 2018 list turns out to be like the 2014 list in the end....A LOT of misses, when everything is said and done, lots of big time players littering the 50-100, and some completely forgettable players in the top 10.. There are some GOOD players mentioned so far.
|
|
|
Post by curiousvolleyballdad on Sept 8, 2017 17:37:02 GMT -5
I would have to agree she is awfully low for someone who has successfully played up. whatevs....perhaps the 2018 list turns out to be like the 2014 list in the end....A LOT of misses, when everything is said and done, lots of big time players littering the 50-100, and some completely forgettable players in the top 10.. There are some GOOD players mentioned so far. Uh Yeah there is. So either this was a deeper class than expected or there will be a lot of misses. Hopefully the latter.
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Sept 8, 2017 17:42:57 GMT -5
I would have to agree she is awfully low for someone who has successfully played up. whatevs....perhaps the 2018 list turns out to be like the 2014 list in the end....A LOT of misses, when everything is said and done, lots of big time players littering the 50-100, and some completely forgettable players in the top 10.. There are some GOOD players mentioned so far. The funny thing is if you go back to 2014, the players people were complaining about being underranked were Goehner, Eugene, Albrecht, Haggerty, McCoy, McNeil...and not the actual misses.
|
|