|
Post by horns1 on Dec 9, 2018 20:46:24 GMT -5
Good move by Sun don't you think? Which team is in the F4? horns1 calling on you to answer this question for me... Similar so far to the impact from Holman.
Get back to me when she earns All Conference honors.
|
|
|
Post by azsker on Dec 9, 2018 20:47:42 GMT -5
horns1 calling on you to answer this question for me... Similar to the move from Holman so far.
Get back to me when she earns All Conference honors.
Lol k well speaking of Holman, her 2 national championship rings look good on her. She has as many as your programs existence.
|
|
|
Post by horns1 on Dec 9, 2018 20:50:19 GMT -5
Similar to the move from Holman so far.
Get back to me when she earns All Conference honors.
Lol k well speaking of Holman, her 2 national championship rings look good on her. She has as many as your programs existence. She played in only one, right? And, Texas ate her lunch in the 2016 national semi-final, I believe
|
|
|
Post by azsker on Dec 9, 2018 20:53:53 GMT -5
Lol k well speaking of Holman, her 2 national championship rings look good on her. She has as many as your programs existence. She played in only one, right? And, Texas ate her lunch in the 2016 national semi-final, I believe ...and where was Texas last year when she was holding the trophy? And you believe huh? Don’t forget you didn’t win 2016 either. But with all this given, enjoy the offseason!
|
|
|
Post by Pasquale on Dec 9, 2018 20:55:09 GMT -5
Bitter, party of one, your table is ready.
|
|
|
Post by indyrun on Dec 9, 2018 20:58:27 GMT -5
Ask Wisconsin what it’s like to play Illinois for the third time in a season after having won the first meeting. Orange & Blue 3-1. Ask Nebraska what it's like to win 2 of the last 3 titles with 3 out of 4 less than a week away. Spoiler: They're excited about it. You do understand don't you, that not one single thing your team did in gathering the PAST accolades, will win them "one single point" this next Thursday. Living in the past certainly has its moments, but this is the 2018 National Championship, and I'm rather sure the Huskers past years wins will not clutter the Illini players minds for a single moment. On the other hand, I think maybe it might actually benefit the "the unknown kids from central Illinois" if the Nebraska players DID hit the floor musing about yesteryear...
|
|
|
Post by azsker on Dec 9, 2018 20:59:21 GMT -5
Ask Wisconsin what it’s like to play Illinois for the third time in a season after having won the first meeting. Orange & Blue 3-1. Illinois is pretty bad defensive team Badgers outhit Illinois .347 to .294 And Badgers out scored Illinois in the over 500 points they played this year Also outscored Nebraska but that’s becoming a common theme last few years. Doesn’t matter who wins this game as either will get smoked by Stanford. Lol what point are you making? That you’re better than Illinois and Nebraska? Illinois won 2 of 3 against the Badgers. Nebraska played Wisconsin once and it was during their stretch from hell. It was a 5 set loss on the road and I’m pretty sure it was even in scoring after 4. Normally a team does outscore the other when they play once and it’s a 5 set win. Idk what “common theme” you are referencing when attempting to establish this non-existent Badger dominance over the Huskers, but don’t forget who contends year in and year out and who plays bridesmaid. You sound quite bitter pal..
|
|
|
Post by horns1 on Dec 9, 2018 20:59:31 GMT -5
She played in only one, right? And, Texas ate her lunch in the 2016 national semi-final, I believe ...and where was Texas last year when she was holding the trophy? And you believe huh? Don’t forget you didn’t win 2016 either. But with all this given, enjoy the offseason! You're the one who cared enough to tag me and invite me to post on this thread. At least acknowledge that Holman only played for one championship; stop making it seem like what I posted is inaccurate.
You're the one who seems to want to talk about Texas so much. You really want to keep this going here and de-rail this thread? SMH
|
|
|
Post by NebraskaVBfan93 on Dec 9, 2018 21:07:06 GMT -5
Ask Wisconsin what it’s like to play Illinois for the third time in a season after having won the first meeting. Orange & Blue 3-1. Illinois is pretty bad defensive team Badgers outhit Illinois .347 to .294 And Badgers out scored Illinois in the over 500 points they played this year Also outscored Nebraska but that’s becoming a common theme last few years. Doesn’t matter who wins this game as either will get smoked by Stanford. I'm betting the Badger coaching staff, players and most of their fans would LOVE to have a chance to "get smoked by Stanford" in the championship match. I'm surprised a Wisconsin fan would find consolation in the fact that they won't. But alas, there are only four teams practicing tomorrow and the Badgers have once again went into an early hibernation.
|
|
|
Post by indyrun on Dec 9, 2018 21:11:06 GMT -5
Ask Wisconsin what it’s like to play Illinois for the third time in a season after having won the first meeting. Orange & Blue 3-1. Illinois is pretty bad defensive team Badgers outhit Illinois .347 to .294 And Badgers out scored Illinois in the over 500 points they played this year Also outscored Nebraska but that’s becoming a common theme last few years. Doesn’t matter who wins this game as either will get smoked by Stanford. Yeah, nothing like a bad defense to help you to a 32-3 record and a #2 RPI and a #3 seed and a current winning streak, I believe, of 17 straight. Seems like - and guess I should go back and see if I have the "important" stats correct - but I also seem to recall, regardless of the numbers, the Illini won 2 of the 3 matches against Wisconsin.
|
|
|
Post by ilikecorn on Dec 9, 2018 21:14:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mapuan on Dec 9, 2018 21:15:47 GMT -5
My prediction is that Nebraska will win based on team chemistry alone. Foecke’s supporting cast is overall better than Quade’s by a very short margin.
|
|
|
Post by tallguy86 on Dec 9, 2018 21:37:33 GMT -5
My prediction is that Nebraska will win based on team chemistry alone. Foecke’s supporting cast is overall better than Quade’s by a very short margin. True. Sun and Stivrins are better than Bastianelli/Fleming/Prince. Calli/Sweet and Cooney look like cancel each other out. Not very productive, but good for a handful of kills. The X factor here is how Hames will do.
|
|
|
Post by ilikecorn on Dec 9, 2018 21:50:28 GMT -5
My prediction is that Nebraska will win based on team chemistry alone. Foecke’s supporting cast is overall better than Quade’s by a very short margin. True. Sun and Stivrins are better than Bastianelli/Fleming/Prince. Calli/Sweet and Cooney look like cancel each other out. Not very productive, but good for a handful of kills. The X factor here is how Hames will do.
|
|
|
Post by Pasquale on Dec 9, 2018 21:57:48 GMT -5
My prediction is that Nebraska will win based on team chemistry alone. Foecke’s supporting cast is overall better than Quade’s by a very short margin. True. Sun and Stivrins are better than Bastianelli/Fleming/Prince. Calli/Sweet and Cooney look like cancel each other out. Not very productive, but good for a handful of kills. The X factor here is how Hames will do. Comparing apples to apples: Bastianelli, .352, 1.40 bps Fleming, .431, 1.04 bps Strivins, .409, 1.22 bps Schwarzenbach, .299, 1.38 Cooney, .281, .61 bps Sweet, .205, .80 bps
|
|