|
Post by huskerrob on Oct 22, 2019 3:57:04 GMT -5
just went back and watched the Purdue game again, 7 were set out of 134 attacks(5.2%), of which 3 were kills(42.9%), 3 were dug(42.9%) & 1 was blocked(14.3%). Your point? My point? /facepalm I said this I don't know that the BIQ has been very successful, my own first impression is that it isn't used very often and when it is used, it secedes nearly 50% of the time with 20-30% being an error. I could be way off, as this is just an impression based on recall. you replied with this Your recall must be pretty bad, because against Purdue, our second-to-most recent match, our BIC attack was probably the most successful it's been all season. I then did another review of Purdue game, for which the factual #'s turn out to be that it was used 5.2% of the attacks in that match...pretty sure that is a good definition of "not used very often" In that usage, it was successful(spelled right this time), 42.9% of the time (seems pretty dang close to the 50% claimed), and had been blocked 14.3% (seems pretty dang close to the 20% error stated). Do you get the point now?
|
|
|
Post by huskerrob on Oct 22, 2019 4:19:23 GMT -5
i dont have numbers but having the BIQ is almost a better option than Callie swinging at this point. Kubiks and Suns defense will be fine, they've improved a lot since the start of the season This. They need the backrow hits because Callie is just not effective (as of the moment, whether it’s Hames or her own doing) offensively, yet. In that same Purdue game being discussed above, some posters make the claim the BIQ was used the most & most successfully thus far this season, and I don't recall any game where their statement doesn't hold true. So if it is as you suggest, TAs=7, K=3 E=1 %=.286 is a replacement of Callie's work...here is what she hit in that same match TAs=9, K=4, E=1 %=.333. I also do not think all those 7 attacks came with Callie as MB, as I think 2 if not more, were run with Stivrins (so tempted to say Stivy! ROFL) as MB but I am not 100% sure of this. My impression watching it is that the game plan was to attack Purdue's middles, make them run all night, make them have to wait & react not preload to a specific area, and when they didn't, then the BIQ or the quick set to the MBs or Hames over on 2 was the punishment. If they did hold tight to react, then the pins were lighting them up. You can see several close up shots of the Middles and see they were being worked as they were often out of breath & bent over hands on knees.
|
|
|
Post by donut on Oct 22, 2019 11:09:52 GMT -5
My point? /facepalm I said this I don't know that the BIQ has been very successful, my own first impression is that it isn't used very often and when it is used, it secedes nearly 50% of the time with 20-30% being an error. I could be way off, as this is just an impression based on recall. you replied with this Your recall must be pretty bad, because against Purdue, our second-to-most recent match, our BIC attack was probably the most successful it's been all season. I then did another review of Purdue game, for which the factual #'s turn out to be that it was used 5.2% of the attacks in that match...pretty sure that is a good definition of "not used very often" In that usage, it was successful(spelled right this time), 42.9% of the time (seems pretty dang close to the 50% claimed), and had been blocked 14.3% (seems pretty dang close to the 20% error stated). Do you get the point now? Spouting data points does not a "point" make, especially when those data points do nothing to refute or modify the statement I made. Calm down and humble yourself. Assuming your stats are correct, the BIC attack hitting .285 with almost a kill/set and almost 2 attempts/set doesn't disprove my statement that "our BIC attack was probably the most successful it's been all season..." Hitting .285 from the backrow (with several OOS sets) against a ranked team is pretty good. Sure, we'd like to see it more, but this is a step in the right direction of establishing the BIC attack as a consistent threat. You've also failed to respond to my point, using your favorite stat, that Densberger is arguably a worse passer than Sun and Kubik. Lastly, I don't know why you're bragging about the accuracy of your guesses - I never questioned those and it's highly irrelevant. In short: Densberger doesn't provide more passing stability and takes away an improving BIC attack. You've failed to engage with either of those points, but congrats on somewhat guessing back row percentage of the Purdue match correctly lol!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2019 16:13:23 GMT -5
Random fun facts from Conf only stats.
Nebraska leads in Hitting %: .294 Opp Hitting %: .139 Assists/Set: 13.32 Kills/Set: 14.18 Kills by Opponents/set: 11.11 Assists by Opponents/set: 10.21 Blocks by Opp/Set: 1.64 Digs by Opp/Set: 11.89
Lauren leads in H% at .517
|
|
|
Post by TuesdayGone on Oct 22, 2019 16:22:32 GMT -5
Random fun facts from Conf only stats. Nebraska leads in Hitting %: .294 Opp Hitting %: .139 Assists/Set: 13.32 Kills/Set: 14.18 Kills by Opponents/set: 11.11 Assists by Opponents/set: 10.21 Blocks by Opp/Set: 1.64 Digs by Opp/Set: 11.89 Lauren leads in H% at .517 And to top it off you get to win a BIG TEN Championship due to the injuries at Wisconsin
|
|
|
Post by mfs on Oct 22, 2019 16:29:35 GMT -5
What is wrong with Rette? I went back and wAtched the fifth set at Illinois and did not see what happened.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2019 16:30:12 GMT -5
Random fun facts from Conf only stats. Nebraska leads in Hitting %: .294 Opp Hitting %: .139 Assists/Set: 13.32 Kills/Set: 14.18 Kills by Opponents/set: 11.11 Assists by Opponents/set: 10.21 Blocks by Opp/Set: 1.64 Digs by Opp/Set: 11.89 Lauren leads in H% at .517 And to top it off you get to win a BIG TEN Championship due to the injuries at Wisconsin if Nebraska ends up winning the B1G wisconsins injuries will have nothing to do with it
|
|
|
Post by Kingsley on Oct 22, 2019 20:25:15 GMT -5
Random fun facts from Conf only stats. Nebraska leads in Hitting %: .294 Opp Hitting %: .139 Assists/Set: 13.32 Kills/Set: 14.18 Kills by Opponents/set: 11.11 Assists by Opponents/set: 10.21 Blocks by Opp/Set: 1.64 Digs by Opp/Set: 11.89 Lauren leads in H% at .517 And to top it off you get to win a BIG TEN Championship due to the injuries at Wisconsin I'm just not nearly as pessimistic about a Rettke-less Wisconsin as you are. Wisconsin is significantly more talented than Michigan or Michigan State, even without her. After that, it's Maryland, Indiana, Ohio State, and Maryland. Easy wins. Let the roster heal during that period. If Rettke won't be back at all, I still think you can compete with Minnesota (who has had their own injuries and lineup problems), Nebraska, and Penn State. I will concede that if you have to endure matches without Rettke AND Duello, then there will be some problems.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Oct 22, 2019 21:58:20 GMT -5
Random fun facts from Conf only stats. Nebraska leads in Hitting %: .294 Opp Hitting %: .139 Assists/Set: 13.32 Kills/Set: 14.18 Kills by Opponents/set: 11.11 Assists by Opponents/set: 10.21 Blocks by Opp/Set: 1.64 Digs by Opp/Set: 11.89 Lauren leads in H% at .517 And to top it off you get to win a BIG TEN Championship due to the injuries at Wisconsin That’s the way the ball bounces cupcake
|
|
|
Post by HuskerPower1 on Oct 23, 2019 7:10:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by HuskerPower1 on Oct 23, 2019 7:32:08 GMT -5
Random fun facts from Conf only stats. Nebraska leads in Hitting %: .294 Opp Hitting %: .139 Assists/Set: 13.32 Kills/Set: 14.18 Kills by Opponents/set: 11.11 Assists by Opponents/set: 10.21 Blocks by Opp/Set: 1.64 Digs by Opp/Set: 11.89 Lauren leads in H% at .517 And to top it off you get to win a BIG TEN Championship due to the injuries at Wisconsin Go cry somewhere else, you’ll get no sympathy from me
|
|
|
Post by HuskerPower1 on Oct 23, 2019 10:53:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ilikecorn on Oct 23, 2019 17:29:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ilikecorn on Oct 23, 2019 17:31:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bball on Oct 23, 2019 17:55:31 GMT -5
Wow, so nobody heard about cap Davis yet I see....
|
|