|
Post by curiouskg on Dec 13, 2019 15:05:25 GMT -5
They do look like something you wear to stay in all day and binge watch netflix lol It's both the design and the baggy fit...looks like a pajama jersey fabric also. I can picture the team during their pre-season Team Christmas, looking at their new jerseys and going 😳 I’m fine with baggy. It’s the design that isn’t attractive. Makes them all look like linebackers...and they aren’t!
|
|
|
Post by eazy on Dec 13, 2019 15:06:21 GMT -5
To be fair, its not like any of those B1g team were unseeded. Granted, Minnesota, Purdue and Nebraska had moderately-tough second round matchups, but they were at their home courts. The b1g will always get that many teams to the round of 16, solely because of RPI. It’s so circular to use unfair regionalization in bracketing and hca in the sub regional to try and prove a point about the big 10. Purdue shouldn’t have even been a seed. It goes directly back to my point- these narratives just reinforce each other. The big 10 should be great therefore it is great. My only point was that there was plenty of evidence to suggest that the big 10 was not as dominant this year, so Wisconsin doing well in conference shouldn’t be that surprising, and it doesn’t mean that Wisconsin losing to quality teams outside of the big 10 should be used as some lightning rod that they had this magical turn around one week into conference play. I don't know that the big is as dominant this year. I think some of these matches and upcoming matches will have the final say. You say Purdue shouldn't have been seeded, but until the very end of the season lots of people thought Marquette deserved to be seeded, and Purdue took them down. Illinois probably shouldn't have even made it into the tournament, but they still gave Utah one of the best matches of the entire tournament. But I also don't think that your main point about Wisconsin not having a huge turn-around was supported by that. Wisconsin went from losing some matches against very good teams, to consistently beat some good teams. Is ESPN going to play it up because the numbers look like a good talking point? Yes. But the increase in level of consistency is still note-worthy.
|
|
|
Post by jwvolley on Dec 13, 2019 15:06:29 GMT -5
Voss isn't good
|
|
|
Post by brybast on Dec 13, 2019 15:07:04 GMT -5
Hahaha Sunderland: "A lot of 'hair on fire' fans here in Wisconsin"
|
|
|
Post by eazy on Dec 13, 2019 15:07:36 GMT -5
It's both the design and the baggy fit...looks like a pajama jersey fabric also. I can picture the team during their pre-season Team Christmas, looking at their new jerseys and going 😳 I’m fine with baggy. It’s the design that isn’t attractive. Makes them all look like linebackers...and they aren’t! Have you seen Haggerty and Loberg in person?? They are Middle LBs.
|
|
|
Post by radioactiveman on Dec 13, 2019 15:07:37 GMT -5
Hilarious. I just came over to comment on the baggy Wisconsin jerseys and happen to scroll up to see that I'm not the only one. I seems like they are constantly pulling up their sleeves. I would think that's a distraction when passing.
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Dec 13, 2019 15:17:00 GMT -5
Turn out the lights ...
|
|
|
Post by nothingbutcorn on Dec 13, 2019 15:20:02 GMT -5
Looks like UA needs some work on their jerseys.
|
|
|
Post by gopherhim on Dec 13, 2019 15:24:15 GMT -5
Gomez is GOOD
|
|
|
Post by smartrf on Dec 13, 2019 15:24:49 GMT -5
Yes! Go Gomez! Way to get to 16s!
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastopp on Dec 13, 2019 15:25:04 GMT -5
A&M is scrappy
|
|
|
Post by gopherhim on Dec 13, 2019 15:25:55 GMT -5
18-17 Aggies! TO Wisconsin
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Dec 13, 2019 15:26:01 GMT -5
COME ON WISCONSIN!!
|
|
|
Post by smartrf on Dec 13, 2019 15:26:11 GMT -5
18-17 for Texas A&M
|
|
|
Post by gopherhim on Dec 13, 2019 15:27:15 GMT -5
So far this set:
A&M 12-2-29 (.345) Wisconsin 13-4-33 (.273)
|
|