|
Post by mikevolley on Dec 26, 2019 15:54:44 GMT -5
For those that want Elan McCall to end up at Penn state, I did find it interesting that Blossom, Hord and Serena Gray are all now following her instagram account
|
|
|
Post by houstonbear15 on Dec 26, 2019 16:09:47 GMT -5
For those that want Elan McCall to end up at Penn state, I did find it interesting that Blossom, Hord and Serena Gray are all now following her instagram account As are a few of the Baylor players
|
|
|
Post by Kingsley on Dec 26, 2019 16:14:56 GMT -5
For those that want Elan McCall to end up at Penn state, I did find it interesting that Blossom, Hord and Serena Gray are all now following her instagram account McCall to Penn State? Does this mean PSU won’t get— Nevermind.
|
|
|
Post by mikevolley on Dec 26, 2019 16:19:37 GMT -5
For those that want Elan McCall to end up at Penn state, I did find it interesting that Blossom, Hord and Serena Gray are all now following her instagram account McCall to Penn State? Does this mean PSU won’t get— Nevermind. Considering that they have enough space to get at least 2 more players... it is not a stretch to think that all of Russ' eggs arent in one basket
|
|
|
Post by Kingsley on Dec 26, 2019 16:22:46 GMT -5
McCall to Penn State? Does this mean PSU won’t get— Nevermind. Considering that they have enough space to get at least 2 more players... it is not a stretch to think that all of Russ' eggs arent in one basket Russ is going places!
|
|
|
Post by mikevolley on Dec 26, 2019 16:25:35 GMT -5
Considering that they have enough space to get at least 2 more players... it is not a stretch to think that all of Russ' eggs arent in one basket Russ is going places! He isnt the first and he wont be the last.
|
|
|
Post by horns1 on Dec 26, 2019 16:31:46 GMT -5
For those that want Elan McCall to end up at Penn state, I did find it interesting that Blossom, Hord and Serena Gray are all now following her instagram account As are a few of the Baylor players What's the current Big 12 conference undergraduate intra-conference transfer rule? Didn't Andi Malloy have to sit out one year, and lose one year of eligibility when she transferred from Iowa State to Baylor a few years ago?
|
|
|
Post by houstonbear15 on Dec 26, 2019 16:42:41 GMT -5
As are a few of the Baylor players What's the current Big 12 conference undergraduate intra-conference transfer rule? Didn't Andi Malloy have to sit out one year, and lose one year of eligibility when she transferred from Iowa State to Baylor a few years ago? She did have to sit out and lost a season of eligibility in the Big 12. She appealed to get a fourth year of eligibility but lost the vote 6-4 by Big 12 officials. McCall would have the same opportunity to appeal to not lose a season. I’m not sure what information they would present to the Big 12 but maybe the vote could go in her favor. Sitting out a year wouldn’t hurt because she’d have a spot open with Pressley graduating. It’s the loss of a season that may turn her away.
|
|
|
Post by jayj79 on Dec 26, 2019 20:55:13 GMT -5
have never understood why those transfer rules (who has to sit out a year, who has to lose a year of eligibility) can't be black and white, so that student athletes knew ahead of time what the situation was, rather than depending on how conference or NCAA officials just happened to be feeling o that particular day, or on whether or not they personally like the SA or the school they're transferring too or whatever
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2019 21:25:23 GMT -5
have never understood why those transfer rules (who has to sit out a year, who has to lose a year of eligibility) can't be black and white, so that student athletes knew ahead of time what the situation was, rather than depending on how conference or NCAA officials just happened to be feeling o that particular day, or on whether or not they personally like the SA or the school they're transferring too or whatever Because, like everything with the NCAA, decisions are inevitably governed by economic motives and the failure to set any firm rules gives the organization a flimsy, yet valuable defense against the charges of hypocrisy and corruption.
|
|
|
Post by horns1 on Dec 26, 2019 21:34:25 GMT -5
The majority (if not all) conferences have rules regarding intra-conference transfers; it's not like a player does not know what those rules are when they make the decision to transfer to a school within the same conference; and, it's not like they are being forced to remain in the same conference. This is their choice.
What surprises me is that there is any kind of appeal process whatsoever months later to try to regain the one year of eligibility which they knowingly "signed away" from the onset based on their transfer decision.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2019 21:42:06 GMT -5
The majority (if not all) conferences have rules regarding intra-conference transfers; it's not like a player does not know what those rules are when they make the decision to transfer to a school within the same conference; and, it's not like they are being forced to remain in the same conference. This is their choice. What surprises me is that there is any kind of appeal process whatsoever months later to try to regain the one year of eligibility which they knowingly "signed away" from the onset based on their transfer decision. As I just intimated, such waivers exist because the NCAA cares about making money off of it's athletes AND it cares about the illusion of fairness. The waivers allow the NCAA to indemnify itself against it's own rules regarding eligibility which might otherwise restrict a valuable player from earning money for the organization.
|
|
|
Post by horns1 on Dec 26, 2019 21:50:52 GMT -5
The majority (if not all) conferences have rules regarding intra-conference transfers; it's not like a player does not know what those rules are when they make the decision to transfer to a school within the same conference; and, it's not like they are being forced to remain in the same conference. This is their choice. What surprises me is that there is any kind of appeal process whatsoever months later to try to regain the one year of eligibility which they knowingly "signed away" from the onset based on their transfer decision. As I just intimated, such waivers exist because the NCAA cares about making money off of it's athletes AND it cares about the illusion of fairness. The waivers allow the NCAA to indemnify itself against it's own rules regarding eligibility which might otherwise restrict a valuable player from earning money for the organization. We might be talking about different things. I'm taking about intra-conference transfers; the appeals are voted on by the member schools' representative. NCAA has nothing to do with this, I believe.
In women's hoops, the SEC did away with the loss of a year of eligibility for intra-conference transfers. It's very prevalent now. They still sit out one year, but don't lose any eligibility. The talent stayimg within the conference is their reasoning for this change. It might apply to some men's sports, too, in the SEC.
|
|
|
Post by rjaege on Dec 26, 2019 23:20:06 GMT -5
Intra-conference transfer restrictions seem counter-productive to me, in that they encourage transfering players to leave the conference.
|
|
|
Post by jayj79 on Dec 26, 2019 23:26:10 GMT -5
Intra-conference transfer restrictions seem counter-productive to me, in that they encourage transfering players to leave the conference. so you don't have any problem with a player from your team transferring to your team's arch rival?
|
|