|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Aug 30, 2024 20:15:01 GMT -5
Colvin finished with 10 blocks!
Anderson had 8!
Myers had 6!
Hudson had 5!
Purdue ended with 17 team blocks.
|
|
|
|
Post by timduckforlife on Aug 30, 2024 20:15:02 GMT -5
Purdue wins 3-1! Close call to end the match but it was the right call. Anderson got to a close ball on the plane and was setting the ball when the K-State middle interfered. so the call was interference? seemed like the ball was on the plane based on the replay. It wasn't clear from the announcers what the challenge was actually for |
|
|
|
Post by boilermaker5 on Aug 30, 2024 20:15:18 GMT -5
Purdue wins 3-1! Close call to end the match but it was the right call. Anderson got to a close ball on the plane and was setting the ball when the K-State middle interfered. Can you explain the rule? I thought of it was over the net the middle could interfere. |
|
|
|
Post by Freeman on Aug 30, 2024 20:16:36 GMT -5
Purdue wins 3-1! Close call to end the match but it was the right call. Anderson got to a close ball on the plane and was setting the ball when the K-State middle interfered. There isn't a gym in America where that should have been called. Purdue had control of the match, but K State stormed back and got robbed. If it were challengeable, it would have been overturned. |
|
|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Aug 30, 2024 20:16:58 GMT -5
Purdue wins 3-1! Close call to end the match but it was the right call. Anderson got to a close ball on the plane and was setting the ball when the K-State middle interfered. so the call was interference? seemed like the ball was on the plane based on the replay. It wasn't clear from the announcers what the challenge was actually for It looked to me like the up ref called the middle blocker for blocking Anderson from setting. The ball was on the plane but Anderson made it to the ball first and was clearly trying to set the ball when the middle touched it. |
|
|
|
Post by boilermaker5 on Aug 30, 2024 20:17:23 GMT -5
Purdue wins 3-1! Close call to end the match but it was the right call. Anderson got to a close ball on the plane and was setting the ball when the K-State middle interfered. so the call was interference? seemed like the ball was on the plane based on the replay. It wasn't clear from the announcers what the challenge was actually for 23 |
|
|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Aug 30, 2024 20:18:25 GMT -5
Purdue wins 3-1! Close call to end the match but it was the right call. Anderson got to a close ball on the plane and was setting the ball when the K-State middle interfered. Can you explain the rule? I thought of it was over the net the middle could interfere. The ball looked in the plane to me. Anderson, as the front row setter, had her hands on the ball, trying to set when the middle tried to block her. |
|
|
|
Post by boilermaker5 on Aug 30, 2024 20:21:03 GMT -5
Can you explain the rule? I thought of it was over the net the middle could interfere. The ball looked in the plane to me. Anderson, as the front row setter, had her hands on the ball, trying to set when the middle tried to block her. My question is: if Anderson had contacted the ball first while the ball was on Purdue's side, then the ball crossed over, and the KSU player touched it on KSUs side of the net while Anderson was still setting it, is that a violation? |
|
|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Aug 30, 2024 20:23:52 GMT -5
The ball looked in the plane to me. Anderson, as the front row setter, had her hands on the ball, trying to set when the middle tried to block her. My question is: if Anderson had contacted the ball first while the ball was on Purdue's side, then the ball crossed over, and the KSU player touched it on KSUs side of the net while Anderson was still setting it, is that a violation? I'd say no, it's not a violation, but I welcome anyone else else's interpretation! |
|
|
|
Post by timduckforlife on Aug 30, 2024 20:26:23 GMT -5
Can you explain the rule? I thought of it was over the net the middle could interfere. The ball looked in the plane to me. Anderson, as the front row setter, had her hands on the ball, trying to set when the middle tried to block her. What I don't really understand is how that is still not a challengeable play. Replay seemed insanely clear that the ball was on the plane. Bad way to end this match. KState deserved better |
|
|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Aug 30, 2024 20:28:58 GMT -5
The ball looked in the plane to me. Anderson, as the front row setter, had her hands on the ball, trying to set when the middle tried to block her. What I don't really understand is how that is still not a challengeable play. Replay seemed insanely clear that the ball was on the plane. Bad way to end this match. KState deserved better I agree with you that the NCAA needs to be better about what plays should be challengeable. And that they probably need better officials too. Maybe it should've been a replay instead of the match-ending point decided by the up ref. |
|
|
|
Post by spoilerboilermakers on Aug 31, 2024 9:52:44 GMT -5
Kansas State is going to win a lot of matches. They are so good. They beat Purdue in every stat almost except in blocks.
|
|
|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Aug 31, 2024 10:01:17 GMT -5
Kansas State is going to win a lot of matches. They are so good. They beat Purdue in every stat almost except in blocks. Carter is obviously going to get her kills but Szulczewski is just crazy good. She moves the ball around so smoothly. Larkin and Brown are also great additions. It's wild to me they were picked to finish so low in the Big XII. |
|
|
|
Post by digs on Aug 31, 2024 11:17:26 GMT -5
Great atmosphere at Holloway last night. As expected in a season opener, there were rough stretches for both teams. But it was a highly competitive match. KState is VERY scrappy and made Purdue work for everything. Aliyah Carter is a beast - super athletic, very fun to watch. And the Wildcats setter was terrific. That said, I see gobs of potential in this Purdue team. Probably too early to claim “championship makeup”, but it’s an incredibly competitive group. And not just Hudson/Chicoine/Colvin. There are some warriors in this bunch.
|
|
|
|
Post by austintatious on Aug 31, 2024 12:46:30 GMT -5
My question is: if Anderson had contacted the ball first while the ball was on Purdue's side, then the ball crossed over, and the KSU player touched it on KSUs side of the net while Anderson was still setting it, is that a violation? I'd say no, it's not a violation, but I welcome anyone else else's interpretation! You are correct. IF Anderson legally set the ball, it is directed toward the defense, whether it has entered the plane or not it can be legally blocked. |
|
