|
|
Post by pavsec5row10 on Sept 18, 2024 23:05:33 GMT -5
Is there a box score somewhere Only have found the not great one from NCAA.com |
|
|
|
Post by Flip on Sept 18, 2024 23:33:55 GMT -5
Why do you lie? She had 7 kills vs Ball St. hitting 0.500 What about the other matches since Kentucky?!!!! Don't bother responding, I'll assume you said something clever. literally wtf are you talking about ? Like are you genuinely stupid or do you just have a hard time reading stats. She hit 909 with 10 kills on 11 swings against St. John’s. FOUR DAYS AGO. Literally just like I said. Pls tell me where I lied…. (PS the St. John’s match four days ago was between the Kentucky match and today just in case you’re still confused) Sorry, my bad. I totally missed that match. I'm just upset with today's results. I still feel like something is not right with her since Kentucky. We'll see over the next couple weeks, maybe I'm wrong and it's something non-physical. |
|
|
|
Post by bellvision1 on Sept 19, 2024 5:48:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Sept 19, 2024 6:11:59 GMT -5
Not sure what the dood at the scorer's table was smokin', but good for Pitt for all the high-scoring sets, and the blockbuster attendance. Pitt should play all their matches at Petersen.  |
|
|
|
Post by accprovolley on Sept 19, 2024 6:45:09 GMT -5
Not sure what the dood at the scorer's table was smokin', but good for Pitt for all the high-scoring sets, and the blockbuster attendance. Pitt should play all their matches at Petersen. I’m not sure what’s going on with the scores, but the attendance number is correct |
|
|
|
Post by blue10 on Sept 19, 2024 7:31:48 GMT -5
Bro these Pitt stats are insane. 59 kills in a sweep?  Stafford 17 kills hitting 552 Fairbanks 48 assists in 3 sets Ryla Jones 11 kills 7 blocks in 3 sets ?? Babcock 15 kills 5 blocks Klika 18 digs |
|
|
|
Post by uofaGRAD on Sept 19, 2024 7:39:24 GMT -5
Bro these Pitt stats are insane. 59 kills in a sweep? Stafford 17 kills hitting 552 Fairbanks 48 assists in 3 sets Ryla Jones 11 kills 7 blocks in 3 sets ?? Babcock 15 kills 5 blocks Klika 18 digs (I wonder what happened bc the stats are actually not possible. looks like everyone might’ve got a slight boost bc it says Pitt scored 35 points in the first set and 26 in the second which is the only way the stats make sense) |
|
|
|
Post by blue10 on Sept 19, 2024 7:47:35 GMT -5
Bro these Pitt stats are insane. 59 kills in a sweep? Stafford 17 kills hitting 552 Fairbanks 48 assists in 3 sets Ryla Jones 11 kills 7 blocks in 3 sets ?? Babcock 15 kills 5 blocks Klika 18 digs (I wonder what happened bc the stats are actually not possible. looks like everyone might’ve got a slight boost bc it says Pitt scored 35 points in the first set and 26 in the second which is the only way the stats make sense) Idk because I know that the Stafford and Babcock kill numbers are correct because they said so during the broadcast and I would assume they would have had that and also they both passed the eye test of having that many each definitely |
|
|
|
Post by uofaGRAD on Sept 19, 2024 7:54:16 GMT -5
(I wonder what happened bc the stats are actually not possible. looks like everyone might’ve got a slight boost bc it says Pitt scored 35 points in the first set and 26 in the second which is the only way the stats make sense) Idk because I know that the Stafford and Babcock kill numbers are correct because they said so during the broadcast and I would assume they would have had that and also they both passed the eye test of having that many each definitely no like add up the amount of points Pitt scored it’s like 87 lmao that’s not possible in a 25- sweep. something is wrong |
|
|
|
Post by blue10 on Sept 19, 2024 7:55:06 GMT -5
Idk because I know that the Stafford and Babcock kill numbers are correct because they said so during the broadcast and I would assume they would have had that and also they both passed the eye test of having that many each definitely no like add up the amount of points Pitt scored it’s like 87 lmao that’s not possible in a 25- sweep. something is wrong well as long as they don’t take any points away from Torrey when they fix it it’s okay LMAO |
|
|
|
Post by PpprPrtnr on Sept 19, 2024 10:07:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by uofaGRAD on Sept 19, 2024 10:09:23 GMT -5
oh yeah this is definitely the correct version also, watching the replay now and I’ve always been high on her but jeez Babcock has an argument for best blocker in the country. full stop. |
|
|
|
Post by vbdiva on Sept 19, 2024 10:23:27 GMT -5
Ok Pitt, I see you boo..... The Panthers are the real deal... unless some team(s) really up their game, they are the favorites in the ACC and to win their first Natty...
Diva is impressed :-)
|
|
|
|
Post by hopefuldawg on Sept 19, 2024 11:17:21 GMT -5
I don't know what individual stats to trust. ncaa.com and ncaa.org say different things. Normally I would go with .org, but that says Penn State had 0 blocking errors, while .com correctly says they had 2.
Either way, I wanted to say Babcock had her worst serving night of the season (potentially of her career) and still killed it. If her serve was dialed in last night, the beatdown would've been egregious.
|
|
|
|
Post by netninja on Sept 19, 2024 12:31:40 GMT -5
Pitt has really been dominant this year. Are there any weaknesses for Pitt? Even if they have an off night serving, they have a great block. Even if they have a bad night passing, Rachel is so athletic and flings that thing around and they're good OOS. And their coaching and opponent prep is so good. This could definitely be their year. As a Badger fan I wouldn't want to be in their bracket come tourney time, though the revenge would be sweet for them beating us in the Field House a couple of years ago, but I'd like to stay away this year.
|
|
