|
|
Post by bbg95 on Sept 29, 2024 21:07:38 GMT -5
Well, they went to three Final Fours and won two titles in his first three seasons. I'm not sure just any coach could have gotten that result even with that ridiculously loaded team. That said, it remains an open question whether he can build a great team of his own. So far, the answer is "no." This a very pessimistic view imo, but also I understand that a lot of people on here put the 99% of a teams value on their tourney finishes. Stanford finished the last two seasons as conference champions and a top 4 tourney seed. I guess to you those aren’t “great” teams but I think that they definitely are. We lost a 5 set match by a hair to incredibly talented and veteran San Diego squad and then put up a better fight than wisco or Nebraska did against a red hot Texas team that ended up winning the whole thing in dominant fashion. Those two things happening doesn’t make or break whether a team is great to me but like I said, ik a lot of yall base ur opinions off of just the tournament Stanford is being judged by its own standards. That's the price of success. And no, they weren't great teams. They were all quite sus defensively. Edit: I decided to look up Stanford's opponent hitting percentage this season. It's way worse than I thought (.219, roughly 235th in the country). |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Sept 29, 2024 21:13:12 GMT -5
This is an odd year for volleyball. Nothings making sense except Nebraska.
|
|
|
|
Post by blue10 on Sept 29, 2024 21:14:42 GMT -5
This is an odd year for volleyball. Nothings making sense except Nebraska. Pitt would like a word |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Sept 29, 2024 21:16:18 GMT -5
This is an odd year for volleyball. Nothings making sense except Nebraska. Pitt would like a word Yes, that makes sense also but, does anyone else? |
|
|
|
Post by hornshouse23 on Sept 29, 2024 21:22:06 GMT -5
This is an odd year for volleyball. Nothings making sense except Nebraska. Pitt would like a word This being the litmus of posters who follow any volleyball whatsoever outside of their favorite team/conference. |
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Sept 29, 2024 21:29:04 GMT -5
This being the litmus of posters who follow any volleyball whatsoever outside of their favorite team/conference. Also, what about SMU made sense? |
|
|
|
Post by photos1 on Sept 29, 2024 22:02:37 GMT -5
This is an odd year for volleyball. Nothings making sense except Nebraska. Pitt would like a word Yeah, but you are the one who thinks UCLA has no talent…so not sure you should be trusted to know what Pitt’s word is… 13 matches ago, they played and Pitt was only marginally competitive… and they both have virtually the same teams careening toward each other… so we’ll see. . . You don’t still think UCLA has no talent, right? Asking for a friend… 🏐 |
|
|
|
Post by Norah Sus on Sept 29, 2024 22:28:13 GMT -5
Yeah, but you are the one who thinks UCLA has no talent…so not sure you should be trusted to know what Pitt’s word is… 13 matches ago, they played and Pitt was only marginally competitive… and they both have virtually the same teams careening toward each other… so we’ll see. . . You don’t still think UCLA has no talent, right? Asking for a friend… 🏐 Of all the teams you could put up against Pitt this year to make any sort of argument, you pick UCLA? Lmfao 😭 |
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Sept 30, 2024 8:38:22 GMT -5
I think this was Luper/DeBeer's best passing game
DeBeer: 2.38 (25)
Luper: 2.67 (12)
Scott: 2.14 (11)
Beaven: 2.00 (19)
Rubin: 2.38 (21)
Oglivie: 2.1 (10)
Pringle: 2.00 (11)
|
|
|
|
Post by herecomesthebusboom on Sept 30, 2024 10:23:31 GMT -5
I think this was Luper/DeBeer's best passing game DeBeer: 2.38 (25) Luper: 2.67 (12) Scott: 2.14 (11) Beaven: 2.00 (19) Rubin: 2.38 (21) Oglivie: 2.1 (10) Pringle: 2.00 (11) Omg I knew Anna was passing well but that’s so impressive, especially having that many attempts. And Luper was just lights out yesterday. Love it. |
|
|
|
Post by miss girl on Sept 30, 2024 12:37:50 GMT -5
This is an odd year for volleyball. Nothings making sense except Nebraska. Don't you have 45 off the net threads to make in the next hour? |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Sept 30, 2024 12:42:05 GMT -5
This is an odd year for volleyball. Nothings making sense except Nebraska. Don't you have 45 off the net threads to make in the next hour? Oh dear, when people say stuff like this, it makes me even more determined to spend a great deal of time on the volleyball board. And when people start complaining, I’m going to tell them it’s your fault. Not the brightest bulb are you? |
|
|
|
Post by miss girl on Sept 30, 2024 12:43:53 GMT -5
Don't you have 45 off the net threads to make in the next hour? Oh dear, when people say stuff like this, it makes me even more determined to spend a great deal of time on the volleyball board. And when people start complaining, I’m going to tell them it’s your fault. Not the brightest bulb are you? whatever any of that means lmao |
|
|
|
Post by princessavb on Sept 30, 2024 20:07:09 GMT -5
I just saw a tik tok saying that Charitie Luper touches higher than Madisen Skinner? I had to be sure so i checked and i am flabbergasted, Charitie is not a real human being (6'3) Skinner 10'8, (5/9/5'8) Luper 10'9 that is crazy work.. she went off against stanford it was basically her vs them https://www.tiktok.com/@volleyaura/video/7420594080347966763
|
|
|
|
Post by princessavb on Sept 30, 2024 20:09:19 GMT -5
I just saw a tik tok saying that Charitie Luper touches higher than Madisen Skinner? I had to be sure so i checked and i am flabbergasted, Charitie is not a real human being (6'3) Skinner 10'8, (5/9/5'8) Luper 10'9 that is crazy work.. she went off against stanford it was basically her vs them https://www.tiktok.com/@volleyaura/video/7420594080347966763
and Yes i totally i agree she is one of the best if not the best undersized hitter in the nation (college) right now Ms girl is in her prime fr |
|
