|
|
Post by ersatzhusker on Sept 26, 2007 22:55:30 GMT -5
I rolled the ol' time-traveling DeLorean out of garage, drove it around the block far enough to jump ahead in time by 24 hours. Then I walked back in my house and asked my future self how the Stanford-USC match turned out on Thursday night, September 27, 2007. The result you can read in this thread's title. Posting this thread this way will save all you Cardinal fans, Trojan fans, Pac-10 fans and volleyball fans in general the trouble of watching the tape delay or TiVo/DVR of the USC-Stanford game on TV, much less having to check on the web or even attending the actual game. I'm just here to help.  BTW, Barboza is ... great! She'll definitely be one of the final candidates for POY. |
|
|
|
Post by baywatcher on Sept 26, 2007 23:15:40 GMT -5
Let's see, where's that USC-Nebraska thread from the regional final a few years ago................
|
|
|
|
Post by ersatzhusker on Sept 26, 2007 23:19:21 GMT -5
Let's see, where's that USC-Nebraska thread from the regional final a few years ago................ You don't get the point, do you? |
|
|
|
Post by Tiruray2004 on Sept 26, 2007 23:22:15 GMT -5
Let's see, where's that USC-Nebraska thread from the regional final a few years ago................ You don't get the point, do you? No, you don't get the point1 Baywatcher is talking about REALITY. Of course, truth hurts! |
|
|
|
Post by ersatzhusker on Sept 26, 2007 23:24:50 GMT -5
No, you don't get the point1 Baywatcher is talking about REALITY. Of course, truth hurts! This thread has NOTHING to do with Stanford, USC, Barboza or Nebraska. Or to do with time travel. It has to do with the "pet peeves" thread. My pet peeve is posting the final score in the thread title. Sorry to be so subtle. |
|
|
|
Post by StanfordFan on Sept 26, 2007 23:53:29 GMT -5
Ok, that was pretty subtle, actually. I thought you were just trying to be silly. No, you don't get the point1 Baywatcher is talking about REALITY. Of course, truth hurts! This thread has NOTHING to do with Stanford, USC, Barboza or Nebraska. Or to do with time travel. It has to do with the "pet peeves" thread. My pet peeve is posting the final score in the thread title. Sorry to be so subtle. |
|
|
|
Post by ersatzhusker on Sept 27, 2007 0:19:59 GMT -5
To be perfectly clear, I actually do not have a prediction on the Stanford-USC match.
But, I do think that Barboza is terrific.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tiruray2004 on Sept 27, 2007 0:48:29 GMT -5
No, you don't get the point1 Baywatcher is talking about REALITY. Of course, truth hurts! This thread has NOTHING to do with Stanford, USC, Barboza or Nebraska. Or to do with time travel. It has to do with the "pet peeves" thread. My pet peeve is posting the final score in the thread title. Sorry to be so subtle. I don't care what your pet peeve is but please don't tell us what or what not to pose. Who do you think you are Pres. Bush?! |
|
|
|
Post by spikerthemovie on Sept 27, 2007 1:45:14 GMT -5
Ironically, this sort of thread is my pet peeve.
|
|
|
|
Post by roofed! on Sept 27, 2007 1:50:30 GMT -5
No, you don't get the point1 Baywatcher is talking about REALITY. Of course, truth hurts! This thread has NOTHING to do with Stanford, USC, Barboza or Nebraska. Or to do with time travel. It has to do with the "pet peeves" thread. My pet peeve is posting the final score in the thread title. Sorry to be so subtle. If the actual pet peeve is about putting the final score in the thread title, why are you dragging in Stanford and USC into this? Why don't you just use the Texas vs Texas Tech thread since that is exactly what you are getting peeved about? |
|
|
|
Post by Tiruray2004 on Sept 27, 2007 2:21:35 GMT -5
This thread has NOTHING to do with Stanford, USC, Barboza or Nebraska. Or to do with time travel. It has to do with the "pet peeves" thread. My pet peeve is posting the final score in the thread title. Sorry to be so subtle. If the actual pet peeve is about putting the final score in the thread title, why are you dragging in Stanford and USC into this? Why don't you just use the Texas vs Texas Tech thread since that is exactly what you are getting peeved about? My thoughts exactly! |
|
|
|
Post by Gorf on Sept 27, 2007 5:18:46 GMT -5
Ironically, this sort of thread is my pet peeve. One of my pet peeves is people discussing their pet peeves.  |
|
|
|
Post by SaltNPepper on Sept 27, 2007 6:53:21 GMT -5
One of my pet peeves is when actual scores are NOT included in the thread title.
|
|
|
|
Post by itsallaboutme on Sept 27, 2007 7:30:03 GMT -5
I named my dog "Mr. Peeves".
|
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Sept 27, 2007 13:05:52 GMT -5
There should be a rule about misleading thread titles. I wouldn't even mind if a violation of said rule is classified as a capital offense. So sophomoric.
|
|
