|
|
Post by bownlovingfreak on Sept 29, 2007 23:41:07 GMT -5
Holy cow, what happened to Cal Poly?
|
|
|
|
Post by gaelfan on Sept 29, 2007 23:54:29 GMT -5
Looks like a nice win for Charlie!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mix Breed-TEXAS,HI,LBSU on Sept 30, 2007 0:01:09 GMT -5
Good Job Pacific!....
|
|
|
|
Post by georgia(pacific)girl on Sept 30, 2007 0:30:32 GMT -5
Holy cow, what happened to Cal Poly? nothing. they played well. Pacific just played better. Tonite. |
|
|
|
Post by farmingfamily on Sept 30, 2007 0:52:09 GMT -5
Wow Wow Wow!! We got there late so only saw the end of game 2 & the rest. The people we sit near told us about game 1, glad we missed it.
This was vintage UOP stuff. Great crowd, great Volleyball, great fun.
#8 Hilbers, for UOP was my favorite tonight.
What is with the San Luis coaches hair? My husband said he must have lost a bet or something. You think he would wait till the end of the season to go out in public like that.
Great win Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by baywatcher on Sept 30, 2007 1:02:07 GMT -5
For Pacific, Hilberg on slides from the middle and Anderson from the right scored timely side out after side out, and Svenja Englehurdt was able to score enough from the left to keep Cal Poly blockers semi honest. The final block count was about 17 to 5 in favor of cal Poly, and it was clear that Poly was getting more blockers in better position consistently. I think Cal Poly was hurt a little by Waller not having a great night, only hitting .135 with nine kills and 4 errors, and the two freshman, or I think they are, Olowolafe and Rivera, both had overall good nights but got tentative at big points in the match. And Pacific started digging a lot of balls the last two games. I remember seeing Waller last year and she was dominant; not tonight and I'm not sure how much this year. Atherstone is spectacular; had 22 kills and it seemed like more than that, easily. Frankly, as an observer without a real rooting interest I thought Cal Poly was a little smoother and more organized on defense, but it did not convert to points, at least after the first game, which Cal Poly won very easily. Real difference was Pacific defense, as stated above. And Pacific's ability to side out and stay ahead the last two games bodes well for Pacific playing other good teams, as Cal Poly did look sound and did not really self-destruct.
|
|
|
|
Post by vbuzz on Sept 30, 2007 4:34:59 GMT -5
Most definitely, they will drop out of the top 25. I don't know what to make of this Cal Poly team, when they're good...they're really good, and when they're not....they're not.
|
|
|
|
Post by kolohekeiki on Sept 30, 2007 5:17:47 GMT -5
so is UC Irvine a decent team then because didn't Irvine sweep Pacific?
|
|
|
|
Post by middlemonkey on Sept 30, 2007 9:00:20 GMT -5
so is UC Irvine a decent team then because didn't Irvine sweep Pacific? and what about fullerton, they beat pacific in 4! |
|
|
|
Post by kolohekeiki on Sept 30, 2007 10:08:07 GMT -5
so is UC Irvine a decent team then because didn't Irvine sweep Pacific? and what about fullerton, they beat pacific in 4! sorry my bad...it was fullerton they lost to...not Irvine |
|
|
|
Post by IdahoBoy on Sept 30, 2007 14:04:27 GMT -5
Most definitely, they will drop out of the top 25. I don't know what to make of this Cal Poly team, when they're good...they're really good, and when they're not....they're not. Maybe Pacific has just turned the corner? |
|
|
|
Post by sideoutnow on Sept 30, 2007 19:22:40 GMT -5
Charlie is having a better season this year. I hope Pacific returns to its national prominence status.
|
|
|
|
Post by farmingfamily on Sept 30, 2007 22:59:03 GMT -5
The team is definitely improved, and playing hard that is all we really ask.
Great job, we love the effort.
|
|
