Lwood
Sophomore
Go Lions!
Posts: 247
|
Post by Lwood on May 29, 2004 9:32:33 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2004 12:21:16 GMT -5
OhmyGod. (The subject line fooled me.)
You ARE making that claim!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2004 13:57:51 GMT -5
You're going to have to do a heck of a lot better than posting Bill Kristol propaganda, by the way.
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on May 29, 2004 14:40:56 GMT -5
Don't try too hard Lwood. These idiots have their heads buried so far up their butts they can't smell reality.
The ineptness of the Dummycratic party will be proven once again this November. I'll be sure to rub it in as well. ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2004 15:52:33 GMT -5
Just another difference between you and me, BiK. Not once have I called LWood an idiot.
There was no Saddam-al Qaeda connection. Even Bush and Rumsfeld have admitted as much.
But if you want to post Bill Kristol's delusions that is fine. I'd just like to see you both anmit you were wrong when this, too, is discredited.
Seriously, all I want is the Truth (and spare me your Nicholson crap). This Administration only wants to further its own agenda, whatever that agenda may be, whatever the facts may be. They do it with Iraq, with their "War on Terror", their economic policies, their environmental policies, their taxes, etc. etc. They couldn't tell the Truth if their lives depended on it.
Glub glub glub.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2004 16:00:21 GMT -5
The ineptness of the Dummycratic party will be proven once again this November. I'll be sure to rub it in as well. ;D If Bush wins in November, it does not change anything. He is still the worst President this country has ever had. Like your Sports rantings, all that ever seems to matter to you is who wins. Seriously, what it the Moron-in-Chief going to do about all these pressing issues: 1) the deficit 2) Israel's behavior (encouraged by our total disregard for International law and human rights) 3) the environment 4) education 5) the mess that is our "War on Drugs" 6) stem cell research 7) terrorism and our role in the International Community 8) AIDs Why do they waste our time and resources on such non-problems as Cuba? Gay Marriage? The Pledge of Allegiance? This Administration is not up to the task at hand. I know it. You and LWood know it.
|
|
|
Post by islandgirl on May 29, 2004 17:42:03 GMT -5
Just another difference between you and me, BiK. Not once have I called LWood an idiot. Lol!! Aw (R)uffda!, your subtlety is truly a work of art!
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on May 29, 2004 20:16:13 GMT -5
Seriously, all I want is the Truth (and spare me your Nicholson crap). You can't handle the truth! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2004 20:22:43 GMT -5
I asked you to spare me! What I wouldn't give to see Shaq take out Jack...
|
|
Lwood
Sophomore
Go Lions!
Posts: 247
|
Post by Lwood on May 29, 2004 20:40:17 GMT -5
I simply asked the question - No link? - and I got a thesis on why (R) hates Bush.
It is an interesting article, and as (R) pointed out, we will find out the truth over time. I am not about to try to predict the future, but I do know that Saddam was no boyscout.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2004 20:46:37 GMT -5
I don't hate Bush for those reasons. I think he is a lousy President for those reasons.
I have other reasons for disliking the man. "Hate" would be a little strong.
The answer to your question would be: a very feeble link if it's a link at all.
Sorry for boring you with my response...although most of it was directed to BiK's post. I thought my response to your post was pretty much on-topic.
|
|
Lwood
Sophomore
Go Lions!
Posts: 247
|
Post by Lwood on May 29, 2004 21:02:48 GMT -5
I don't hate Bush for those reasons. I think he is a lousy President for those reasons. I have other reasons for disliking the man. "Hate" would be a little strong. The answer to your question would be: a very feeble link if it's a link at all. Sorry for boring you with my response...although most of it was directed to BiK's post. I thought my response to your post was pretty much on-topic. Don't apologize. I enjoyed your post. I would get really bored in the off season if I didn't have you and Gorf to argue with about things that we have no control over. ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2004 23:24:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Gorf on Jun 3, 2004 22:20:06 GMT -5
Aren't there "ties" between the Bush family and Bin Laden / Al Queda?
If such "ties" are a valid argument for the removal of Saddam why are they not also valid arguments for the removal of GWB?
|
|
Lwood
Sophomore
Go Lions!
Posts: 247
|
Post by Lwood on Jun 4, 2004 9:13:34 GMT -5
>-(Gorf)-<[} link=board=news&thread=1085841153&start=13#0 date=1086319206]Aren't there "ties" between the Bush family and Bin Laden / Al Queda? If such "ties" are a valid argument for the removal of Saddam why are they not also valid arguments for the removal of GWB? Did you watch the "Fahrenheit 9/11" trailer to come up with this tidbit? Which by the way looks entertaining, but who can trust Michael Moore after "Bowling For Columbine" was shown to be full of fabrications? www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.htmlIf there is a Bush family and a Bin Laden family connection that would not be surprising. The Bin Laden family is a rich Saudi family who I would think has oil industry ties. An Osama Bin Laden and Bush family connection is a ridiculous statement.
|
|