|
Post by nobody special on Feb 13, 2003 15:13:09 GMT -5
didnt billings pop a ball that he hit?
|
|
|
Post by notme on Feb 13, 2003 20:30:25 GMT -5
Chris Fash, are you kidding me??!!??
|
|
|
Post by slim jim on Feb 14, 2003 16:11:39 GMT -5
Koski, Rivera, and the Octaroon brought some serious heat on and off the court.
|
|
|
Post by AnotherGuest on Feb 18, 2003 10:29:23 GMT -5
didnt billings pop a ball that he hit? I remember reading that he did - I think it was during last season when I read this from the USC site.
|
|
|
Post by WaveRider on Feb 18, 2003 15:04:50 GMT -5
Past: George Roumain... Duh Present: there's a few, I'll agree with most about Billings... but being the Pep fan that I am... only one other person has mentioned Fred Winters... his power is incredible!
|
|
|
Post by Ike on Feb 18, 2003 15:19:36 GMT -5
You can talk about Tony Ching all you want but George Roumain is cha-ching! That's the sound of money!
|
|
|
Post by THEMAN on Feb 26, 2003 17:28:05 GMT -5
Who writes into this site? To me it sounds like a bunch of flatfooted, no shoe wearing hawaiians! Are you guys all stupid or have you just been hitting the Maui Wowie a little too much? Tony Ching? Are you kidding me? How could you ever compare a monkey like Tony Ching, who by the way is probably one of the most average college players I've EVER seen, to the likenesses of George Roumain, Brook Billings, Clay Stanley or Dave Mckenze. Hey, but I'll give the man some credit for a guy who is only 5'4", he gets up and hits the ball with a bit of pace. Whatever, I'm over it!
|
|
|
Post by StuffU on Feb 26, 2003 17:34:30 GMT -5
hehe... your post is so full of inaccuracies LOL ...
But I'd say that Clay Stanley was a far more AVERAGE college player than Tony Ching. When Stanley was at Hawaii he was still a SUPER raw player, and very average. Tony Ching is a superior player to Stanley if you're speaking college careers.
|
|
|
Post by THEMAN on Feb 26, 2003 18:20:16 GMT -5
Thats real nice that you have a man crush on Tony Ching, but the topic of this forum is who hits the hardest. Average, shmaverage, I know for a fact that Stanley can hit serve the ball 75mph, thats world class! You can't teach that.
P.S. I'm over you and your platonic lust for Tony Ching.
|
|
|
Post by spikemaster on Feb 26, 2003 19:05:06 GMT -5
This is in response to just4me28's comment about Clay Stanley. THE MAN was right, do you lust for Tony Ching or what? There is NO WAY that Tony Ching compares to Clay Stanley. The game today is all about scoring points, you can ONLY score by kills, blocks and aces. Clay Stanley has all those attributes and he had them when he played at Hawaii, maybe he was a little raw. Perhaps Tony Ching might be able to get some kills, but thats it, the kid isn't blocking or acing anyone! If Clay Stanley 4 years ago were playing today in college, as "raw" as he was, he would be the top point scorer, kill leader and have the most aces. I don't know what your definition of a good player is, but in today's games its all about scoring points which makes Stanley 3x's better than Ching. Don't even try to argue, you know I'm right.
P.S. I agree with THE MAN, I'm over you and your crush on Tony Ching!
|
|
|
Post by ohboy on Feb 26, 2003 19:06:42 GMT -5
Man crush? Ho ho that was seriously funny, dude! ;D
But please, THEMAN, get over it! I am!
|
|
|
Post by shibbybeam on Feb 26, 2003 19:22:21 GMT -5
I would have to agree that Tony Ching barely hits harder than any other player in the MPSF. But if we are talking about past college players Ried Priddy hits harder than anyone ive ever seen with the exception for Roumain. Ill tell you who the future hardest hitter is, a kid by the name of Brandon Mel. Mel is redshirt for UC Irvine, and teams are going to have to fear him in the years to come.
|
|
|
Post by THEBOY on Feb 26, 2003 19:36:48 GMT -5
I'm over it!
|
|
|
Post by LOL on Feb 27, 2003 7:47:46 GMT -5
The game today is all about scoring points, you can ONLY score by kills, blocks and aces. This isn't true. A team can also score points because the opponent stepped on the back line when serving. A team can also score a point if their opponent is out of rotation after the serve is made. A team can score a point if the opponent made a lift. A team can score a point if the opponent made an illegal substitution. And the list goes on. All those examples I have given you has nothing to do kills, blocks, and aces as being the ONLY way to score points.
|
|
|
Post by spikemaster on Feb 27, 2003 8:06:30 GMT -5
I apologize, I didn't know I was communicating my message to complete morons. What I meant to say was that a PERSON, not a team, playing in a match can only score points by blocks, spikes and aces. I COMPLETELY forgot about the statistic of really dumb errors. Maybe that statistic is really important at the open gym you play at. Who is this anyway, are you a referee or something who get his kicks from making foot fault and lift calls. Dork This isn't true. A team can also score points because the opponent stepped on the back line when serving. A team can also score a point if their opponent is out of rotation after the serve is made. A team can score a point if the opponent made a lift. A team can score a point if the opponent made an illegal substitution. And the list goes on. All those examples I have given you has nothing to do kills, blocks, and aces as being the ONLY way to score points.
|
|