|
Post by IdahoBoy on Dec 12, 2010 15:12:05 GMT -5
I wonder what Leslie is saying (yelling). It looks like she is trying to keep JMac back. Either that, or she can't figure out why Sully is grabbing him. She looks pissed.... I'm betting she's upset with JMac.
|
|
|
Post by Keystonekid on Dec 12, 2010 15:12:21 GMT -5
LOL, give what up? Who is disagreeing with you about Cook whining or not saying anything about the call post match handshake?
|
|
|
Post by Keystonekid on Dec 12, 2010 15:14:19 GMT -5
I wonder what Leslie is saying (yelling). It looks like she is trying to keep JMac back. Either that, or she can't figure out why Sully is grabbing him. She looks pissed.... I'm betting she's upset with JMac. Cook said, "nice match, the ball was out" Jmac has aknowledged that is what Cook said. He was pissed, he had to be restrained. If you watch the video Cook is 50 feet away, walking with his back turned whild JMAC is being held back.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Dec 12, 2010 15:19:30 GMT -5
Cook said, "nice match, the ball was out" Jmac has aknowledged that is what Cook said. He was pissed, he had to be restrained. If you watch the video Cook is 50 feet away, walking with his back turned whild JMAC is being held back. While I do suspect that is exactly what Cook said (at first ... he is clearly saying something stronger than that in some of the photos), McLaughlin declined to comment on what was said. So on what basis do you say "Jmac has aknowledged that is what Cook said"?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2010 15:19:38 GMT -5
LOL, give what up? Who is disagreeing with you about Cook whining or not saying anything about the call post match handshake? Giving up trying to converse with beef. He refuses to read what I post.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Dec 12, 2010 15:26:30 GMT -5
There you go again. I have not ONCE defended JMac or his behavior. You can keep saying it, but it isn't true. Cook needs to stop whining. Now. They lost. Now show some class.[/quote I agree ruffda. My point is that I can agree but also state that its unfair that the post game @$$%*!* was all his doing. It wasnt. Thats not defending him, its being fair. Cook definitely started it. Cook's only fault is that he couldn't get away quick enough after his comments. images.townnews.com/theindependent.com/content/articles/2010/12/12/sports/huskers_hq/doc4d04690bedb97650043611.jpgYou sound like a third grader telling his teacher at recess...."He started it." It is amazing to me how you are totally ignoring Jims crazy response. Do you feel it was justified?
|
|
|
Post by Keystonekid on Dec 12, 2010 15:27:32 GMT -5
Id like to think that if the shoe was on the other foot, Nebraska won, JMAC made a snarky comment about a call, and Cook went ballistic, that I could say " I dont care what JMAC said, Cook was way out of line to react the way he did, it was unprofessional" That is my only point. Cook's comment is the whole focus, and I dont get that. Well I do get it, people dont like Cook the coach or more specifically how he presents himself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2010 15:29:34 GMT -5
Id like to think that if the shoe was on the other foot, Nebraska won, JMAC made a snarky comment about a call, and Cook went ballistic, that I could say " I dont care what JMAC said, Cook was way out of line to react the way he did, it was unprofessional" That is my only point. Cook's comment is the whole focus, and I dont get that. You don't get it? His comment is what CAUSED the entire issue. Had Cook kept his mouth shut, there would have been no altercation. He's a sore loser.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Dec 12, 2010 15:30:42 GMT -5
There is a certain kind of person who has mastered the art of making provocative snarky comments that really set people off without being explicitly rude (e.g. "Nice dress"). We all know it when we hear it, even though it has a certain amount of plausible deniability later. Cook almost certainly knew that saying "Nice match, that ball was out" was poking McLaughlin right in the eye. But there is no way to prove it.
McLaughlin lost his cool after that, as I'm sure all of us have done from time to time. I doubt he is proud of it. So Cook got what he wanted out of the deal.
But it was the Huskies who got to play the next night.
The people I feel bad for are the Nebraska players, who have to be associated with a guy who seems to have a history of being a whiner.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Dec 12, 2010 15:31:53 GMT -5
Cook said, "nice match, the ball was out" Jmac has aknowledged that is what Cook said. He was pissed, he had to be restrained. If you watch the video Cook is 50 feet away, walking with his back turned whild JMAC is being held back. While I do suspect that is exactly what Cook said (at first ... he is clearly saying something stronger than that in some of the photos), McLaughlin declined to comment on what was said. So on what basis do you say "Jmac has aknowledged that is what Cook said"? What if you had proof that is what Cook said. Then what?...I doubt even then if any of you would admit that Jim went a little nuts .
|
|
|
Post by Keystonekid on Dec 12, 2010 15:32:17 GMT -5
Id like to think that if the shoe was on the other foot, Nebraska won, JMAC made a snarky comment about a call, and Cook went ballistic, that I could say " I dont care what JMAC said, Cook was way out of line to react the way he did, it was unprofessional" That is my only point. Cook's comment is the whole focus, and I dont get that. You don't get it? His comment is what CAUSED the entire issue. Had Cook kept his mouth shut, there would have been no altercation. He's a sore loser. Youre funny, and clearly still young. You can't CAUSE another person to act poorly. John is responsible for what he said, Jim is responsible for how he reacted. Period. You are saying that JMAC isnt responsible for his outburst, he is.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Dec 12, 2010 15:33:30 GMT -5
Id like to think that if the shoe was on the other foot, Nebraska won, JMAC made a snarky comment about a call, and Cook went ballistic, that I could say " I dont care what JMAC said, Cook was way out of line to react the way he did, it was unprofessional" That is my only point. Cook's comment is the whole focus, and I dont get that. You don't get it? His comment is what CAUSED the entire issue. Had Cook kept his mouth shut, there would have been no altercation. He's a sore loser. You don't get it. No comment should have justified that kind of response. THINK for god sakes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2010 15:38:10 GMT -5
You don't get it? His comment is what CAUSED the entire issue. Had Cook kept his mouth shut, there would have been no altercation. He's a sore loser. Youre funny, and clearly still young. You can't CAUSE another person to act poorly. John is responsible for what he said, Jim is responsible for how he reacted. Period. You are saying that JMAC isnt responsible for his outburst, he is. No... I'm saying that THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO OUTBURST HAD JOHN JUST KEPT HIS DAMN MOUTH SHUT AND ACCEPTED THE DEFEAT WITH DIGNITY AND CLASS.I hope that was more clear... And if you think that Cook really didn't cause the situation, you're more biased than I originally thought (no offense). JMac would not have reacted that way had John not made such a sarcastic, condescending comment. Cook caused the altercation. JMac reacted poorly, yes, but nothing would have happened if it wasn't for Class-Act-Cook.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Dec 12, 2010 15:39:03 GMT -5
There is a certain kind of person who has mastered the art of making provocative snarky comments that really set people off without being explicitly rude (e.g. "Nice dress"). We all know it when we hear it, even though it has a certain amount of plausible deniability later. Cook almost certainly knew that saying "Nice match, that ball was out" was poking McLaughlin right in the eye. But there is no way to prove it. McLaughlin lost his cool after that, as I'm sure all of us have done from time to time. I doubt he is proud of it. So Cook got what he wanted out of the deal. But it was the Huskies who got to play the next night. The people I feel bad for are the Nebraska players, who have to be associated with a guy who seems to have a history of being a whiner. I feel badly for Washington fans also for having a coach who lost in front of a national audience.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Dec 12, 2010 15:40:30 GMT -5
Youre funny, and clearly still young. You can't CAUSE another person to act poorly. John is responsible for what he said, Jim is responsible for how he reacted. Period. You are saying that JMAC isnt responsible for his outburst, he is. No... I'm saying that THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO OUTBURST HAD JOHN JUST KEPT HIS DAMN MOUTH SHUT AND ACCEPTED THE DEFEAT WITH DIGNITY AND CLASS.I hope that was more clear... And if you think that Cook really didn't cause the situation, you're more biased than I originally thought (no offense). JMac would not have reacted that way had John not made such a sarcastic, condescending comment. Cook caused the altercation. JMac reacted poorly, yes, but nothing would have happened if it wasn't for Class-Act-Cook. Thank you for owning up to the fact that JMac reacted poorly. Pages of threads later who finally hear that from someone.
|
|