|
Post by dallasvolley on Jan 8, 2024 19:04:09 GMT -5
Is logan parks for sure going to Stanford? I saw a video where she listed her top 3 schools and Stanford was not on the list.
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on Jan 8, 2024 19:06:29 GMT -5
Is logan parks for sure going to Stanford? I saw a video where she listed her top 3 schools and Stanford was not on the list. well nothing is for sure until they sign their senior year, but she has verbally committed to the staff and is planning on attending stanford as of right now
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Jan 8, 2024 19:50:14 GMT -5
Is logan parks for sure going to Stanford? I saw a video where she listed her top 3 schools and Stanford was not on the list. What date was the video taken? Maybe Stanford hadn't knocked on her door yet and once that happened she changed her mind.
|
|
|
Post by cbrown1709 on Jan 8, 2024 20:24:50 GMT -5
Is logan parks for sure going to Stanford? I saw a video where she listed her top 3 schools and Stanford was not on the list. What date was the video taken? Maybe Stanford hadn't knocked on her door yet and once that happened she changed her mind. Older video, and at that time she was really interested in Kentucky. Then Louisville and Nebraska I think.
|
|
|
Post by cbrown1709 on Jan 8, 2024 20:25:36 GMT -5
Maybe a 6-2 with Yu and Harvey? I think you mean Yu and Parks. I meant Harvey and Yu with Parks. Parks setting Harvey and Yu setting Parks.
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Jan 8, 2024 21:58:26 GMT -5
I think you mean Yu and Parks. I meant Harvey and Yu with Parks. Parks setting Harvey and Yu setting Parks. Got it, Yu only 3-ro along the back row, Parks 6-ro and hitting right side. Could work, but Parks at 5'11 or 6'0 pretty short wrt today's college game.
|
|
|
Post by charger0304 on Jan 8, 2024 22:35:19 GMT -5
I meant Harvey and Yu with Parks. Parks setting Harvey and Yu setting Parks. Got it, Yu only 3-ro along the back row, Parks 6-ro and hitting right side. Could work, but Parks at 5'11 or 6'0 pretty short wrt today's college game. Parks is a huge jumper. Yu is a good blocker as well.
|
|
|
Post by cbrown1709 on Jan 8, 2024 23:07:12 GMT -5
I meant Harvey and Yu with Parks. Parks setting Harvey and Yu setting Parks. Got it, Yu only 3-ro along the back row, Parks 6-ro and hitting right side. Could work, but Parks at 5'11 or 6'0 pretty short wrt today's college game. Harvey isn't but 6'0 maybe 6'1. Both she and Parks have great verticals.
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Jan 8, 2024 23:18:35 GMT -5
Got it, Yu only 3-ro along the back row, Parks 6-ro and hitting right side. Could work, but Parks at 5'11 or 6'0 pretty short wrt today's college game. Parks is a huge jumper. Yu is a good blocker as well. I can see Parks as a pretty good blocking setter, but usually you need a tall OPP to contain elite left side hitters. Stanford's last three Opposites: Merete Lutz: 6'8" Adriana Fitzmorris: 6'6" Kendall Kipp: 6'5"
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on Jan 8, 2024 23:41:01 GMT -5
Parks is a huge jumper. Yu is a good blocker as well. I can see Parks as a pretty good blocking setter, but usually you need a tall OPP to contain elite left side hitters. Stanford's last three Opposites: Merete Lutz: 6'8" Adriana Fitzmorris: 6'6" Kendall Kipp: 6'5" jump touch matters just as much, if not more than height. For example, rutherford is 6'0 and has been a great blocker for kentucky because what she loses in 4-5 inches to other elite oppos she makes up for in her ability to jump higher than majority of them can stanford has been spoiled with opposites in terms of their blocking. id say they probably have a better 3 consecutive streak of opposite blockers than anybody else in the ncaa. maybe of all time lol its been pretty ridiculous with lutz, Fitz, and kipp. Harvey may be a step down in blocking from the absolute studs they've had in her position, but I dont think it will be considered a weak point for the team... just maybe not as strong of a point as we're used to
|
|
|
Post by VBallLife on Jan 8, 2024 23:59:08 GMT -5
*Parks Am I the only one who sees Parks beating out Yu?😅 I guess time will tell It was mentioned by Hambly in one of his chalk talks. He was talking about class of 2024 and Yu and said she would be Stanford's setter after Miner, but with the caveat that we have a potential 2025 recruit that might change the equation (not his exact words, but something to that effect). Yu is really good.
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Jan 9, 2024 0:16:06 GMT -5
I can see Parks as a pretty good blocking setter, but usually you need a tall OPP to contain elite left side hitters. Stanford's last three Opposites: Merete Lutz: 6'8" Adriana Fitzmorris: 6'6" Kendall Kipp: 6'5" jump touch matters just as much, if not more than height. For example, rutherford is 6'0 and has been a great blocker for kentucky because what she loses in 4-5 inches to other elite oppos she makes up for in her ability to jump higher than majority of them can stanford has been spoiled with opposites in terms of their blocking. id say they probably have a better 3 consecutive streak of opposite blockers than anybody else in the ncaa. maybe of all time lol its been pretty ridiculous with lutz, Fitz, and kipp. Harvey may be a step down in blocking from the absolute studs they've had in her position, but I dont think it will be considered a weak point for the team... just maybe not as strong of a point as we're used to Yes, possible for someone relatively short to be a very good blocker but timing and reads have to be consistently excellent. Logan Tom for example probably had the best blocking technique of any Stanford left side hitter. Right now we don't know much about Harvey, Yu, and Parks versus good collegiate left side hitters.
|
|
|
Post by acea on Jan 9, 2024 1:21:15 GMT -5
I can see Parks as a pretty good blocking setter, but usually you need a tall OPP to contain elite left side hitters. Stanford's last three Opposites: Merete Lutz: 6'8" Adriana Fitzmorris: 6'6" Kendall Kipp: 6'5" jump touch matters just as much, if not more than height. For example, rutherford is 6'0 and has been a great blocker for kentucky because what she loses in 4-5 inches to other elite oppos she makes up for in her ability to jump higher than majority of them can stanford has been spoiled with opposites in terms of their blocking. id say they probably have a better 3 consecutive streak of opposite blockers than anybody else in the ncaa. maybe of all time lol its been pretty ridiculous with lutz, Fitz, and kipp. Harvey may be a step down in blocking from the absolute studs they've had in her position, but I dont think it will be considered a weak point for the team... just maybe not as strong of a point as we're used to Averaging almost a b/s as a pin is ridiculous, we have been spoiled! Ive not seen all of Fitz or Lutz matches so I won’t comment on them, but Kipp was really good at not getting tooled, probably the best pin blocker in the NCAA. Francis and Vicini’s stats were definitely inflated by her getting stuffs.
|
|
|
Post by tristen on Jan 9, 2024 1:38:22 GMT -5
jump touch matters just as much, if not more than height. For example, rutherford is 6'0 and has been a great blocker for kentucky because what she loses in 4-5 inches to other elite oppos she makes up for in her ability to jump higher than majority of them can stanford has been spoiled with opposites in terms of their blocking. id say they probably have a better 3 consecutive streak of opposite blockers than anybody else in the ncaa. maybe of all time lol its been pretty ridiculous with lutz, Fitz, and kipp. Harvey may be a step down in blocking from the absolute studs they've had in her position, but I dont think it will be considered a weak point for the team... just maybe not as strong of a point as we're used to Yes, possible for someone relatively short to be a very good blocker but timing and reads have to be consistently excellent. Logan Tom for example probably had the best blocking technique of any Stanford left side hitter. Right now we don't know much about Harvey, Yu, and Parks versus good collegiate left side hitters. Honestly i rather have a shorter more athletic opp…its not all abkut height…its about timing speed and quickness and pure athleticism…plus if they csn be set in the back as well as pass, serve/recieve even better…ohh and Logan Tom was a great blocker for her height…on top of just being great at everything else lol
|
|
|
Post by hipsterfilth on Jan 9, 2024 9:19:17 GMT -5
Is logan parks for sure going to Stanford? I saw a video where she listed her top 3 schools and Stanford was not on the list. What date was the video taken? Maybe Stanford hadn't knocked on her door yet and once that happened she changed her mind. Agreed -- it's tough to say something like "I'm really interested in Stanford", since Stanford really has to be interested in you first for your interest to even matter. I believe I read somewhere that Rubin was pretty sure she was headed to Duke with Keefe and she was really surprised by Hambly's late interest which entirely changed her recruitment plans. I'm sure it's something similar.
|
|