|
|
Post by Ralph Kramden on Jun 2, 2014 22:52:12 GMT -5
Unless Tanner's foot is fully healed it is likely that Beals will indeed be running a 5-1. It will be her opportunity to shine, but by the end of the year I think the Husky's will be back in a 6-2.
Based on her numerous skills,Strickland needs to be able to hit and defend during a match. Giving her the libero jersey simply takes away too many options.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Jun 2, 2014 22:58:17 GMT -5
I think most of these questions are going to be answered by how well the newcomers find roles to fit into, not by what the veteran players bring back from last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Jun 3, 2014 11:29:49 GMT -5
Unless Tanner's foot is fully healed it is likely that Beals will indeed be running a 5-1. It will be her opportunity to shine, but by the end of the year I think the Husky's will be back in a 6-2. Based on her numerous skills,Strickland needs to be able to hit and defend during a match. Giving her the libero jersey simply takes away too many options. My thought was that Tanner could set backrow if her mobility isn't significantly restricted, even if her jumping is restricted. That could lead to: OH: Vansant, Scambray (Schwan) MB: Sybeldon, Wade (Jones) OPP: DeHoog, Nelson (Jones) L: Strickland (Condie) S: Beals, Tanner (Finau) |
|
|
|
Post by Ralph Kramden on Jun 3, 2014 14:00:02 GMT -5
Is Schwann actually on scholarship or did she walk on? Sounds crazy but...
|
|
|
|
Post by Incognito on Jun 3, 2014 14:48:04 GMT -5
Courtney will be on scholarship. She signed her NLI.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2014 15:46:01 GMT -5
Unless Tanner's foot is fully healed it is likely that Beals will indeed be running a 5-1. It will be her opportunity to shine, but by the end of the year I think the Husky's will be back in a 6-2. Based on her numerous skills,Strickland needs to be able to hit and defend during a match. Giving her the libero jersey simply takes away too many options. My thought was that Tanner could set backrow if her mobility isn't significantly restricted, even if her jumping is restricted. That could lead to: OH: Vansant, Scambray (Schwan) MB: Sybeldon, Wade (Jones) OPP: DeHoog, Nelson (Jones) L: Strickland (Condie) S: Beals, Tanner (Finau) Wade is not playing before Jones. |
|
|
|
Post by dorothymantooth on Jun 3, 2014 16:26:23 GMT -5
My thought was that Tanner could set backrow if her mobility isn't significantly restricted, even if her jumping is restricted. That could lead to: OH: Vansant, Scambray (Schwan) MB: Sybeldon, Wade (Jones) OPP: DeHoog, Nelson (Jones) L: Strickland (Condie) S: Beals, Tanner (Finau) Wade is not playing before Jones. Wouldn't that be Jmac's call? I think as a general rule we all need to start or end more statements with "IMO". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2014 16:47:11 GMT -5
Wade is not playing before Jones. Wouldn't that be Jmac's call? I think as a general rule we all need to start or end more statements with "IMO". Or just assume that, since you know I'm not JMac, it's probably just my opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by dorothymantooth on Jun 3, 2014 17:02:47 GMT -5
Wouldn't that be Jmac's call? I think as a general rule we all need to start or end more statements with "IMO". Or just assume that, since you know I'm not JMac, it's probably just my opinion. I did say in general. |
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Jun 3, 2014 17:14:51 GMT -5
My thought was that Tanner could set backrow if her mobility isn't significantly restricted, even if her jumping is restricted. That could lead to: OH: Vansant, Scambray (Schwan) MB: Sybeldon, Wade (Jones) OPP: DeHoog, Nelson (Jones) L: Strickland (Condie) S: Beals, Tanner (Finau) Wade is not playing before Jones. Wade has been a two-year starter, while Sybeldon is a one-year starter. That doesn't mean that Jones won't possibly start, but first-year MBs often struggle with JMac's blocking schemes. Bianca Rowland didn't start her freshman year. She can also play both inside and outside - she could fill the utility role that Gabby Parker filled. Her future, once Vansant and Nelson graduate, could be on the outside. |
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Jun 3, 2014 17:17:29 GMT -5
Wouldn't that be Jmac's call? I think as a general rule we all need to start or end more statements with "IMO". Or just assume that, since you know I'm not JMac, it's probably just my opinion. So: "Wade is not playing before Jones, maybe, since what do I know anyway..." |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2014 17:19:48 GMT -5
Or just assume that, since you know I'm not JMac, it's probably just my opinion. So: "Wade is not playing before Jones, maybe, since what do I know anyway..." Mark my words. I can't see that kid not on the floor. |
|
|
|
Post by C on Jun 3, 2014 17:39:33 GMT -5
I have a feeling that Jones will be on the right side. Just a gut feeling.
|
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Jun 3, 2014 18:05:38 GMT -5
So: "Wade is not playing before Jones, maybe, since what do I know anyway..." Mark my words. I can't see that kid not on the floor. She'll play. Just not a certainty or even a probability that she'll start. She'll get her chance to win a spot in the cauldron, however. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2014 18:13:15 GMT -5
Mark my words. I can't see that kid not on the floor. She'll play. Just not a certainty or even a probability that she'll start. She'll get her chance to win a spot in the cauldron, however. There's not a probability that she could start? Try again. She'll start all four years for UW. |
|
