|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Jan 5, 2004 18:21:20 GMT -5
I'm expecting Idaho Boy to be a contestant, per the leak/rumor one month ago on this very board. Good luck IB! Just once, I would like to see a winning contestant in one of these love-match reality shows say to the camera, "...and I don't even like this girl/guy"
|
|
|
|
Post by Overlycheerful on Jan 5, 2004 20:11:40 GMT -5
The last thing this world needs is pretty women marrying Average Joes. It only takes a couple of generations before there are no good-looking people left.
Who's going to fill the modelling jobs?
|
|
|
|
Post by Psychopotamus on Jan 5, 2004 20:19:08 GMT -5
It's simple mathematics.
Pretty + Ugly = Ugly
Pretty + Pretty = Ugly
Ugly + Ugly = Pretty
Strange, but true. It won't matter so much, you just need to ensure that ugly people keep having unprotected sex with eachother.
|
|
|
|
Post by Overlycheerful on Jan 5, 2004 20:24:50 GMT -5
It won't matter so much, you just need to ensure that ugly people keep having unprotected sex with eachother. OK. How do I go about ensuring this? More Grateful Dead concerts? |
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Jan 5, 2004 21:46:17 GMT -5
It's simple mathematics. Pretty + Ugly = Ugly Pretty + Pretty = Ugly Ugly + Ugly = Pretty Strange, but true. It won't matter so much, you just need to ensure that ugly people keep having unprotected sex with eachother. Okay, let's say a pretty girl and a pretty boy are standing at a train platform. A train containing a pretty girl and an ugly boy goes by. It is traveling at the speed of light. While the pretty girl and ugly boy are mating on the train, they flash a beam of light toward the front of the train. On the beam of light is an ugly girl and an ugly boy who are also mating. The big question is: What is the offspring of the pretty-ugly mating as seen by the pretty-pretty couple on the platform? What is the offspring of the ugly-ugly mating as seen by the pretty-pretty couple on the platform? |
|
|
|
Post by Psychopotamus on Jan 5, 2004 23:20:34 GMT -5
Okay, let's say a pretty girl and a pretty boy are standing at a train platform. A train containing a pretty girl and an ugly boy goes by. It is traveling at the speed of light. While the pretty girl and ugly boy are mating on the train, they flash a beam of light toward the front of the train. On the beam of light is an ugly girl and an ugly boy who are also mating. The big question is: What is the offspring of the pretty-ugly mating as seen by the pretty-pretty couple on the platform? What is the offspring of the ugly-ugly mating as seen by the pretty-pretty couple on the platform? One thing at a time: A) pretty + ugly = ugly pretty + pretty = ugly Therefore, pretty +ugly = pretty + pretty. The ugly kid would think the other ugly kid was average, while they would both be ugly. Being on the beam of light would make the viewed ugly person younger. So they would be viewed as an ugly young whippersnapper. B) ugly + ugly = pretty pretty + pretty = ugly With the pretty person on the beam of light, they would be looking at someone old, ugly and dead. This is known as the Zeta-Jones effect. It causes disorientation, memory loss and sometimes matrimony. Not something to be attempted by the average person. |
|
|
|
Post by kolohekeiki on Jan 6, 2004 0:15:42 GMT -5
It's simple mathematics. Pretty + Ugly = Ugly Pretty + Pretty = Ugly Ugly + Ugly = Pretty Strange, but true. It won't matter so much, you just need to ensure that ugly people keep having unprotected sex with eachother. Sorry I disagree with you on this one: pretty + pretty = pretty while ugly + ugly = ugly |
|
|
|
Post by Gorf on Jan 6, 2004 0:43:37 GMT -5
One thing at a time: A) pretty + ugly = ugly pretty + pretty = ugly Therefore, pretty +ugly = pretty + pretty. The ugly kid would think the other ugly kid was average, while they would both be ugly. Being on the beam of light would make the viewed ugly person younger. So they would be viewed as an ugly young whippersnapper. B) ugly + ugly = pretty pretty + pretty = ugly With the pretty person on the beam of light, they would be looking at someone old, ugly and dead. This is known as the Zeta-Jones effect. It causes disorientation, memory loss and sometimes matrimony. Not something to be attempted by the average person. I don't care how fast either couple mates they're going to end up well past Proxima Century by the time they've completed the deed and by the time they (or their respective offspring) get anywhere near the train station again the couple that was alleged to have been watching them would at least be so old that they probably don't care if the offspring of either coupling are ugly or pretty. Are all "big questions" two smaller questions? |
|
|
|
Post by Psychopotamus on Jan 6, 2004 1:01:56 GMT -5
Are all "big questions" two smaller questions? Yes. When you line two smaller questions up end to end, they appear to be a big one. |
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on Jan 6, 2004 12:45:38 GMT -5
Yet another idiotic , senseless TV show trying to captialize on the beauty of the Hawaiian Islands. I'd much prefer this show to be titled "Average Joe-Yukon" or "Average Joe-Siberia".
|
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Jan 6, 2004 16:19:53 GMT -5
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe IB was kicked out in the first episode. He was the one with the 50s style slick oily haircut (it was shaped like an Egyptian pyramid) who sang "Greased Lightning, ...go Greased Lightning!" which we all know is some euphamism for the sex act. No girl is gonna take that kind of lewd talk on a first date.
I didn't like that chick. Shoot, I can't even remember her name.
|
|
|
|
Post by Psychopotamus on Jan 6, 2004 19:19:02 GMT -5
Her name was Larissa and I don't appreciate you making fun of my singing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mumsie on Jan 20, 2004 20:20:30 GMT -5
Here we go again. They brought in the Hunks last night. First time I've watched the show. I thought it was mean to bring in the good looking guys. But, I didn't mind looking at them! Yowza!
|
|
|
|
Post by IdahoBoy on Jan 20, 2004 20:21:56 GMT -5
I haven't been given the boot yet... it sure was fun riding that boat in and scaring the geeks though.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2004 21:38:19 GMT -5
You're a barnacle?
I thought you were 6' plus.
|
|
