Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2015 15:46:21 GMT -5
i think you are the one misunderstanding what volleyguy is saying, dottie. he knows what you've been saying. why not start with holman?
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on May 22, 2015 15:46:31 GMT -5
I read before posting. I suggest you think before posting. If you read before posting, you certainly would have read " I should add that I have always been on record that all transfers should have to sit a year including Holman." Unless of course you have a significant comprehension problem. Which is why I said "If you believe that every transfer ..." In other words, I accepted your premise, and made an argument about where that premise leads. Understand?
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on May 22, 2015 15:46:41 GMT -5
Did Fran call you and tell you she is denying Holman's release because she's a great player? Does she have any other reasons? It wouldnt matter what reason I was given, or anyone else for that matter. The reason she was given was due to the level of player she is, and it hurts the program when she leaves. Both are accurate, I am questioning the fairness of it. I think Fran is both a very good person, and a very good coach. I just think in this situation she is wrong. I can think of numerous valid reasons a coach would be OK releasing one player and not another (issues with how the transfer was handled, its timing, etc.). As you are one of the first posters to criticize others for making assumptions, I would have expected you to have gotten confirmation from the coach, and not just use what you have heard third-hand from the player.
|
|
|
Post by dorothymantooth on May 22, 2015 16:00:56 GMT -5
It wouldnt matter what reason I was given, or anyone else for that matter. The reason she was given was due to the level of player she is, and it hurts the program when she leaves. Both are accurate, I am questioning the fairness of it. I think Fran is both a very good person, and a very good coach. I just think in this situation she is wrong. I can think of numerous valid reasons a coach would be OK releasing one player and not another (issues with how the transfer was handled, its timing, etc.). As you are one of the first posters to criticize others for making assumptions, I would have expected you to have gotten confirmation from the coach, and not just use what you have heard third-hand from the player. You are assuming the coach is a better source than the player!
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on May 22, 2015 16:08:30 GMT -5
I can think of numerous valid reasons a coach would be OK releasing one player and not another (issues with how the transfer was handled, its timing, etc.). As you are one of the first posters to criticize others for making assumptions, I would have expected you to have gotten confirmation from the coach, and not just use what you have heard third-hand from the player. You are assuming the coach is a better source than the player! As to why Player B was released while player A wasn't? Most certainly. I think Holman should be released. I think all players should be able to play right away. But you are claiming that Fran has no fair reason to deny one and grant the other, when there can be many.
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on May 22, 2015 16:09:36 GMT -5
Transfers are like snowflakes, no one situation is exactly the same. I personally don't consider it automatically hypocritical for a coach to give a full release to one player and refuse to do so for another. I also think that there aren't very many legitimate reasons for a coach to withhold a release, but they do exist.
|
|
|
Post by oldmanred on May 22, 2015 16:10:42 GMT -5
Sounds like you're accusing John of swiping Holman! GO HUSKERS it's a figure of speech, but, yes, i think nebraska swiped her. i could pick a less negative word, i guess. but i like "swiped." i'd say the same about any of the other programs who were bidding on her. They didn't bid on her until after she transferred! You need to get your facts straight! I can't believe the moderators allow untrue accusations to be made! GO HUSKERS
|
|
|
Post by dorothymantooth on May 22, 2015 16:12:41 GMT -5
It wouldnt matter what reason I was given, or anyone else for that matter. The reason she was given was due to the level of player she is, and it hurts the program when she leaves. Both are accurate, I am questioning the fairness of it. I think Fran is both a very good person, and a very good coach. I just think in this situation she is wrong. I can think of numerous valid reasons a coach would be OK releasing one player and not another (issues with how the transfer was handled, its timing, etc.). As you are one of the first posters to criticize others for making assumptions, I would have expected you to have gotten confirmation from the coach, and not just use what you have heard third-hand from the player. I don't believe my M.O. on here is throwing out accusations or making assumptions. While there may be good reasons as to why she wasnt released, the reason she was given isnt IMO.
|
|
|
Post by oldmanred on May 22, 2015 16:22:15 GMT -5
It doesn't bother me that Briana will be at Nebraska for 2016 and 2017! That should be a strong spot for the Huskers for those years; but I can understand the hurt it causes for her!
GO HUSKERS
|
|
|
Post by chatchu-off moksri on May 22, 2015 17:02:54 GMT -5
So looking at the roster for USD, there is a MB Kaity Edwards on the roster for next year. Does anyone know if this is the same Kaity Edwards at Santa Clara? If so, then does anyone know why she would transfer? I am assuming if she did transfer, she would have to sit out a year because she is transferring within the conference. Can anyone explain this to me?
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on May 22, 2015 17:24:47 GMT -5
So looking at the roster for USD, there is a MB Kaity Edwards on the roster for next year. Does anyone know if this is the same Kaity Edwards at Santa Clara? If so, then does anyone know why she would transfer? I am assuming if she did transfer, she would have to sit out a year because she is transferring within the conference. Can anyone explain this to me? It would appear it is (what are the chances of there being two MB's named Kaity Edwards from Playa del Rey?) and the WCC does not require intra-conference volleyball transfers to sit out a year. If she's been given a release by SCU, she should be eligible this season. BTW, this would make three schools in three years for her, as she spent her first year at Wyoming.
|
|
|
Post by chatchu-off moksri on May 22, 2015 17:35:50 GMT -5
Thats interesting. I am not sure why she would transfer from SCU because I don't think her starting spot was in danger at SCU. Maybe she was unhappy with the school? I can't think of why she would transfer.
|
|
|
Post by jcvball22 on May 22, 2015 18:41:24 GMT -5
Thats interesting. I am not sure why she would transfer from SCU because I don't think her starting spot was in danger at SCU. Maybe she was unhappy with the school? I can't think of why she would transfer. She needed a scholarship, financially, and SCU didn't have one available. They fully released her so she could pursue one wherever she chose.
|
|
|
Post by owlsem on May 22, 2015 18:49:16 GMT -5
Thats interesting. I am not sure why she would transfer from SCU because I don't think her starting spot was in danger at SCU. Maybe she was unhappy with the school? I can't think of why she would transfer. She needed a scholarship, financially, and SCU didn't have one available. They fully released her so she could pursue one wherever she chose. Good for Santa Clara. Right thing.
|
|
|
Post by chatchu-off moksri on May 22, 2015 18:57:48 GMT -5
Thats great to hear! She is a great player.
|
|