|
|
Post by USC✌🏼 on Aug 28, 2021 1:35:29 GMT -5
USC had 16 aces
|
|
|
|
Post by raian13 on Aug 28, 2021 1:41:02 GMT -5
Is this interesting to USC? Lol “scrimmage” |
|
|
|
Post by JJVb on Aug 28, 2021 1:52:15 GMT -5
Hammons and Owes very ineffective today. Maybe they should just play Schirmer and K. Smith instead of those two, or go to just one setter and simplify it. The coaching decisions are confusing to me. In the 5th set you have K. Smith come in for the first time to serve? The middle blockers really need to work on blocking better, and if they can't maybe Denny needs to be replaced by a different middle blocker. Sabrina Smith is very good at getting kills, so she was a bright spot. Hope they figure it out.
|
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Aug 28, 2021 5:40:52 GMT -5
I'm just going to pop in here and say again the Mick Haley firing was the single worst college volleyball personnel decision I'm familiar with.
|
|
|
|
Post by gobruins on Aug 28, 2021 7:33:00 GMT -5
I believe USC fielded the oldest starting lineup in the history of college volleyball.
1 Junior (Weske)
1 Senior (Lazaro)
5 Grad Students (Botkin, Denny, Hammonds, S. Smith, Scully)
|
|
|
|
Post by Fanaticvb on Aug 28, 2021 23:56:14 GMT -5
I want to see more of K. Smith!
|
|
trojansc
Legend
All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017), All-VolleyTalk 2nd Team (2016), 2021, 2019 Fantasy League Champion, 2020 Fantasy League Runner Up, 2022 2nd Runner Up
Posts: 31,807 
|
Post by trojansc on Aug 31, 2021 1:17:47 GMT -5
It's unfortunate that USC scheduled an uneven amount of games. We could have added a cupcake in the non-conference schedule and gave a better chance of making the tournament. There's a chance we could be sweating getting to .500. Hopefully that's not the case.
|
|
|
|
Post by USC✌🏼 on Aug 31, 2021 4:34:37 GMT -5
It's unfortunate that USC scheduled an uneven amount of games. We could have added a cupcake in the non-conference schedule and gave a better chance of making the tournament. There's a chance we could be sweating getting to .500. Hopefully that's not the case. USC is going to be good. No worries |
|
|
|
Post by babybacksets on Aug 31, 2021 4:50:53 GMT -5
Not much traction in this thread for such an anticipated team. Did things not end up panning out with all the transfers?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fight On! on Aug 31, 2021 21:39:27 GMT -5
Not much traction in this thread for such an anticipated team. Did things not end up panning out with all the transfers? Glass houses and stones … |
|
|
|
Post by babybacksets on Aug 31, 2021 21:58:27 GMT -5
Not much traction in this thread for such an anticipated team. Did things not end up panning out with all the transfers? Glass houses and stones … Wth?? That was an honest question…maybe I missed the match threads and there was better energy in there… Don’t be weird, i know it’s volleytalk but not everyone is out sniping with every comment. I felt like this was a very anticipated season for USC and I’m already reading comments insinuating wishing Mick Haley was still at the helm. |
|
|
|
Post by Fight On! on Aug 31, 2021 22:25:36 GMT -5
Glass houses and stones … Wth?? That was an honest question…maybe I missed the match threads and there was better energy in there… Don’t be weird, i know it’s volleytalk but not everyone is out sniping with every comment. I felt like this was a very anticipated season for USC and I’m already reading comments insinuating wishing Mick Haley was still at the helm. They’re fine. First match jitters. Keller is good. The just have a lot of new pieces so it’s a lot to work through. Maybe one transfer hasn’t done well yet … |
|
|
|
Post by USC✌🏼 on Sept 7, 2021 2:21:24 GMT -5
Any news on 23s?
|
|
|
|
Post by USC✌🏼 on Sept 11, 2021 20:03:14 GMT -5
I want to see Shannon play outside and Hastings lib
|
|
|
|
Post by Fight On! on Sept 13, 2021 19:46:05 GMT -5
59. (49) USC - Pac 12 (14-15) - .5608 - 21
UGH. RPI Futures
|
|
