|
Post by BuckysHeat on Nov 22, 2017 11:00:49 GMT -5
For all those just waiting for the final high numbers, here you go This is only for weeks 5-13 to give them a even comparison Kills | Total | Team | Week |
| 224 | mistabeez | 5 |
| 206 | wolfdog | 7 |
| 206 | buckysheat | 12 |
| 205 | swaneys14 | 7 |
| 197 | buckysheat | 7 |
| 197 | vballfreak808 | 9 |
Assists | Total | Team | Week |
| 303 | sodakinebrah | 5 |
| 290 | doubletrojan | 11 |
| 287 | ay2013 | 13 |
| 286 | doubletrojan
| 10 |
| 286 | ay2013
| 10 |
Aces | Total | Team | Week |
| 29 | trojansc | 5 |
| 23 | vballfreak808 | 8 |
| 20 | buckysheat | 6 |
| 20 | hawk attack | 6 |
| 20 | hawaiivb | 8 |
| 20 | hawk attack | 9 |
Digs | Total | Team | Week |
| 275 | buckysheat | 6 |
| 219 | trojansc | 5 |
| 206 | ay2013 | 13 |
| 203 | buckysheat | 8 |
| 202 | ay2013 | 9 |
Blocks | Total | Team | Week |
| 38.5 | agean09 | 10 |
| 37 | swaneys14 | 11 |
| 36 | agean09 | 11 |
| 34.5 | trojansc | 7 |
| 34.5 | agean09 | 9 |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Nov 25, 2017 13:37:04 GMT -5
I win! with a 4-1 victory over vbfreak. Thank you to my team!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Nov 27, 2017 20:02:40 GMT -5
Week 13 Results
ay2013 def vballfreak808 4-1 189-157, 287-268, 7-16, 206-166, 23.5-22.5 Hawk Attack def doubletrojan 3-2 155-118, 236-250, 18-12, 111-147, 21.5-12.5 BuckysHeat def sodakinebrah 4-1 151-91, 22-245, 13-8, 173-105, 22-19 swaneys14 def trojansc 3-2 139-126, 232-165, 14-18, 157-135, 20.5-22
agean09 def n00b 4-1 119-148, 213-186, 18-16, 145-144, 32-26.5 cbrown1709 def wiscvball 3-2 180-136, 22-201, 5-15, 157-127, 22-20.5 Longhorn20 def HawaiiVB 3-2 146-126, 139-180, 10-11, 147-148, 25.5-18.5 mistabeez def wolfdog 3-2 163-144, 125-26, 13-14, 122-146. 22.5-22
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Nov 27, 2017 20:11:42 GMT -5
Sorry for the delay. Standings are now finalized... Rk | Division I | Record | Sets | 1 | ay2013 | 10-3 | 42-23 | 2 | vballfreak808 | 9-4 | 39-26 | 3 | BuckysHeat | 9-4 | 38-27 | 4 | Hawk Attack | 8-3-2 | 37.5-27.5 | 5 | swaneys14 | 7-6 | 33.5-31.5 | 6 | trojansc | 7-6 | 38-27 | 7 | sodakinebrah | 6-5-2 | 34-31 | 8 | doubletrojan | 6-7 | 32.5-32.5 |
[/font][/td][/tr] Rk | Division II | Record | Sets | 9 | agean09 | 8-5 | 36-29 | 10 | cbrown1709 | 6-5-2 | 32-33 | 11 | mistabeez | 5-8 | 23-42 | 12 | n00b | 5-8 | 32-33 | 13 | wiscvball | 4-8-1 | 28.5-36.5 | 14 | Longhorn20 | 4-9 | 25.5-39.5 | 15 | wolfdog | 3-9-1 | 23.5-41.5 | 16 | HawaiiVB | 2-9-2 | 25-40 " |
"
|
|
|
Post by BuckysHeat on Nov 27, 2017 20:40:36 GMT -5
Frustrating that all I needed was Carly Snider to get 2 aces against freak and I would have won
|
|
|
Post by Hawk Attack on Nov 27, 2017 21:38:29 GMT -5
Sigh... those ties...
|
|
|
Post by agean09 on Nov 27, 2017 22:49:37 GMT -5
1st place in D2 haha. A couple off-nights here and there can make a big difference! Thanks for doing all this N00b. It was fun
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Nov 27, 2017 22:56:58 GMT -5
Yes thanks N00b!!!!
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Jan 30, 2018 14:13:20 GMT -5
So what do ya'll think about revamping the scoring system to keep everyone interested throughout the year? separating it into divisions (which I get was done out of necessity because we added more fantasy teams) made it pretty clear by week 8 that half the league had no chance to win, despite it being rather muddied in the middle. I propose we switched to a points system and cap the number of participants at 12 or 14. Still do the weekly head to head (kills, digs, aces, assists, blocks), but if you win your matchup 4-1 or 5-0, you get 3 points, and if you win 3-2, you get 2 points, and the loser gets 1 point (kind of like an international system). Additionally, BuckysHeat did a bunch of weekly highs and that got me thinking that we could add another wrinkle to get a point for the week and award a point to the team that leads the week in each category (I.e. the fantasy team that gets the most kills for the week gets a point). The standings are then calculated purely points base until the end of the year. Tiebreaker could be head to head then overall weeks won, record against #2, etc. We could keep all the other same drafting rules, I didn't see issue with it last year (posted below), though the one caveat I would like to bring back is that you have to PLAY a freshmen every week, but I'm not married to that idea. What does everyone think? Roster: (1) 12 total players on the roster (2) At all times, your roster must include AT LEAST: 4 outside hitters/opposites, 3 middle blockers, 2 setters, 2 liberos, and at least 1 freshman (true freshmen OR redshirt freshmen that did not play a set last year) (3) You will list 10 active players in your starting lineup each week (no positional restrictions) and must include a freshmen (added) (4) Unlimited roster changes through August 28th. After that, 3 roster changes are allowed (must be submitted by first match of the week to be included in that week's match) (5) The player pool is limited to the following conferences: Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, ACC, SEC, Big East, WCC, Big West, American, Mountain West DRAFT 4 outsides/opposites 3 middles 2 setters 2 liberos 1 freshman (can be a redshirt if she played in zero sets last year). 1- For players that played last year, the position they played to end the season is the position(s) counted towards the initial draft roster 2- For players that did NOT play last year, the position(s) listed on the roster is the position(s) counted towards the initial draft roster 3- Initial draft rosters cannot be penalized re the minimum if a player changes position throughout the season, however if that player is dropped/added, the position they currently play counts towards the minimum. 4- If a player is on your roster to satisfy your libero minimum, any blocks and kills accumulated in matches where she's not libero do not count. You may add a libero to your roster, to make her OH eligible.
|
|
|
Post by agean09 on Jan 30, 2018 15:54:46 GMT -5
I'm a fan of the proposed points idea!
|
|