|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Nov 25, 2017 23:51:59 GMT -5
Conference Finish Stanford: FirstWashington and USC: SecondUtah: FourthColorado and UCLA: FifthOSU: SeventhOregon: EighthWSU: NinthArizona: TenthCal: EleventhASU: Twelfth=================================== Standings: (3) Stanford 19-1 (16) USC 14-6 (8) Washington 14-6 (14) Utah 13-7 (24) Colorado 12-8 (12) UCLA 12-8 (27) OSU 11-9 (26) Oregon 10-10 (37) WSU 6-14 (67) Arizona 5-15 (88) Cal 4-16 (95) ASU 0-20 (Nov 26 pablo rankings) =================================== POY: Kathryn Plummer (Stanford) FOY: Kylee McLaughlin (OSU) SOY: Jenna Gray (Stanford) LOY: Morgan Hentz (Stanford) COY: Mark Barnard (OSU) All-Conference Team Brittany AbercrombieTaylor AgostAdora AnaeReily BuechlerCarly DeHoogAudriana FitzmorrisMadeleine GatesJenna GrayMorgan HentzKhalia LanierMerete LutzMary-Kate MarshallTaylor MimsOluoma OkaroKathryn PlummerCourtney SchwanRonika StoneAlexa SmithHonorable Mention: Naghede Abu, Tami Alade, Brynna DeLuzio, Joslyn Hayes, Crissy Jones, Tawnee Luafalemana, Mac May, Kylee McLaughlin, Berkeley Oblad, Jolie Rasmussen, Lauren Sanders, Tia Scambray, Frankie Shebby, Sarah Sponcil, Bailey Tanner, Carly Trueman, Lindsey Vander Weide, Niki WhithersAll-Freshman Team Brynna DeLuzio
Maddie Goings
Mac May
Meghan McClure
Kylee McLaughlin
Jenny Mosser
Lauren SandersScholar-Athlete Award: Casey Schoenlein (WSU) =================================== 2016: volleytalk.net/thread/66723/pac-2016-final-standings-honors2015: volleytalk.net/thread/61099/pac-2015-final-standings-honors2014: volleytalk.net/thread/56618/pac-2014-final-standings-honors |
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Nov 25, 2017 23:54:36 GMT -5
Cal finishes 11th & 12th, nice ! ASU excommunicated. Relegated. |
|
|
|
Post by volleyl0ver on Nov 26, 2017 0:46:03 GMT -5
My best guess at all PAC team:
Plummer
Gray
Lutz
Hentz
Sponcil
Beuchler
Lanier
Abercrombie
Anae
Oblad
Smith
Shebby
Agost
LVW/Stone
Marshall
Mims
And Idk who'll represent UW? Dehog and Scambray??
|
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Nov 26, 2017 0:59:30 GMT -5
My best guess at all PAC team: Plummer Gray Lutz Hentz Sponcil Beuchler Lanier Abercrombie Anae Oblad Smith Shebby Agost LVW/Stone Marshall Mims And Idk who'll represent UW? Dehog and Scambray?? You must be joking not to be including Schwan, who is better than a lot of those players on that list despite not having the dominant year she had last year. The coaches know her from seeing their teams play against her. She's not going to go from POY to not even on the all-PAC team. However, I am starting to come to terms with the apparent fact that the way the UW plays as a team and distributes the ball around is going to continually keep them underestimated on these lists. Somehow, apparently by magic, the UW keeps winning or being right up at the top of the conference and getting high into the NCAA tournament and yet they never seem to have many of the all-PAC players. It's annoying. |
|
|
|
Post by naujack85 on Nov 26, 2017 1:14:32 GMT -5
My best guess at all PAC team: Plummer Gray Lutz Hentz Sponcil Beuchler Lanier Abercrombie Anae Oblad Smith Shebby Agost LVW/Stone Marshall Mims And Idk who'll represent UW? Dehog and Scambray?? You must be joking not to be including Schwan, who is better than a lot of those players on that list despite not having the dominant year she had last year. The coaches know her from seeing their teams play against her. She's not going to go from POY to not even on the all-PAC team. However, I am starting to come to terms with the apparent fact that the way the UW plays as a team and distributes the ball around is going to continually keep them underestimated on these lists. Somehow, apparently by magic, the UW keeps winning or being right up at the top of the conference and getting high into the NCAA tournament and yet they never seem to have many of the all-PAC players. It's annoying. Schwan wouldn't have been on it based on the first half of conference play. I think Scambray, Dehoog, and Schwan will probably make the All Pac 1st team. Hard to imagine neither Fitzmorris or Alade (or both) not making the 1st team either. I really hope Okaro might sneak onto it, she did everything she could for the Devils this year. |
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Nov 26, 2017 1:18:02 GMT -5
There is only one PAC-12 all-conference team. (Not "first team".) There are also "honorable mentions". I'm not sure whether anyone who gets any votes is "honorable mention" or whether there is some other cutoff for that.
|
|
les
Banned
Falsely equivocates authority
Posts: 911
|
Post by les on Nov 26, 2017 2:27:53 GMT -5
UW players will be a hard group to assess given the constant state of flux. Dehoog and Scambray for sure. Sanders for all frosh team. It wouldn't surprise me if this was it.
|
|
|
|
Post by brybast on Nov 26, 2017 3:14:30 GMT -5
You must be joking not to be including Schwan, who is better than a lot of those players on that list despite not having the dominant year she had last year. The coaches know her from seeing their teams play against her. She's not going to go from POY to not even on the all-PAC team. However, I am starting to come to terms with the apparent fact that the way the UW plays as a team and distributes the ball around is going to continually keep them underestimated on these lists. Somehow, apparently by magic, the UW keeps winning or being right up at the top of the conference and getting high into the NCAA tournament and yet they never seem to have many of the all-PAC players. It's annoying. Uh, last year UW had 3 players on the all-Pac-12 team. Not enough? |
|
|
|
Post by brybast on Nov 26, 2017 3:17:52 GMT -5
UW players will be a hard group to assess given the constant state of flux. Dehoog and Scambray for sure. Sanders for all frosh team. It wouldn't surprise me if this was it. This is really the issue. What's really weird is that all 3 of UW's all-P 12 selections from last year — Schwan, Jones, and Tanner — are either down this year and/or were hampered by injury.I'd say Dehoog is an absolute lock and Scambray is a very likely due to her serving and passing/digging. |
|
|
|
Post by BeiBei on Nov 26, 2017 4:13:41 GMT -5
UCLA will probably have 2 on the all conference list. One of them should be Sponcil. I know Gates Probably will not get the other spot but she certainly deserved it based on the conference only stats,
Gates is third in hitting percentage and she has the most number of kills among the 10 players in that list. She is a middle with a kill per game of 2.99 which is an outside hitter stat. She will be a future all american! the committee will probably give it to Sponcil and you know who
|
|
|
|
Post by brybast on Nov 26, 2017 4:48:18 GMT -5
I'm going out on a limb and ranking my 18 picks for all-Pac-12 team:
1. Plummer
2. Marshall
3. Anae
4. Gray
5. Lutz
6. Mims
7. Abercrombie
8. Hentz
9. Dehoog
10. Sponcil
11. Smith
12. Lanier
13. Fitzmorris
14. Alade
15. Scambray
16. Shebby
17. Stone
18. Buechler
Honorable mentions (in no particular order): Harker, Okaro, Oblad, Luafalemana, Agost, LVW, Deluzio, Abu, Schwan, Jones, McLaughlin, Cheshire, Muno, Gates, Dahlke, Dempi, May, Withers, Dirige
All-Freshman Team: Deluzio, McLaughlin, Goings, May, Sanders, Mosser, Botkin (or maybe Massey)
POY: Plummer
FOY: Deluzio
LOY: Hentz
COY: Barnard
|
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Nov 26, 2017 5:07:13 GMT -5
You must be joking not to be including Schwan, who is better than a lot of those players on that list despite not having the dominant year she had last year. The coaches know her from seeing their teams play against her. She's not going to go from POY to not even on the all-PAC team. However, I am starting to come to terms with the apparent fact that the way the UW plays as a team and distributes the ball around is going to continually keep them underestimated on these lists. Somehow, apparently by magic, the UW keeps winning or being right up at the top of the conference and getting high into the NCAA tournament and yet they never seem to have many of the all-PAC players. It's annoying. Uh, last year UW had 3 players on the all-Pac-12 team. Not enough? They also won the conference. (UCLA and Stanford also had three players each.) Go back to 2015, when Washington also won the conference (tied with USC), and there were two UW players compared to three USC players and four Stanford players. |
|
|
|
Post by brybast on Nov 26, 2017 5:12:31 GMT -5
Uh, last year UW had 3 players on the all-Pac-12 team. Not enough? They also won the conference. (UCLA and Stanford also had three players each.) Go back to 2015, when Washington also won the conference (tied with USC), and there were two UW players compared to three USC players and four Stanford players. Well, them's the breaks. If I were a UW fan, I would trade some of those individual honors for a more dignified showing against Nebraska. |
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Nov 26, 2017 5:14:08 GMT -5
They also won the conference. (UCLA and Stanford also had three players each.) Go back to 2015, when Washington also won the conference (tied with USC), and there were two UW players compared to three USC players and four Stanford players. Well, them's the breaks. If I were a UW fan, I would trade some of those individual honors for a more dignified showing against Nebraska. If I were an ASU fan, I would wish that I ever got into the tournament at all. |
|
|
|
Post by brybast on Nov 26, 2017 5:14:49 GMT -5
Well, them's the breaks. If I were a UW fan, I would trade some of those individual honors for a more dignified showing against Nebraska. If I were an ASU fan, I would wish that I ever got into the tournament at all. Ever? |
|
