|
Post by noreaster on Jan 11, 2019 13:15:11 GMT -5
New Paltz running a 28 man roster? Thats a little ambitious Seems similar to that of Carthage, Stevens, and Kean. They all run pretty large rosters LJ practices with 3 teams of 7 players each so they will always be large.
|
|
|
D3 in 2019
Jan 11, 2019 14:14:28 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by fakevolleynews on Jan 11, 2019 14:14:28 GMT -5
Coach Gary best in D3, IMO. He's real student of game, and an awesome dude. Will be tough for Vassar to keep him as D1 will come calling soon for an as-coach job.
|
|
|
Post by Scipio Aemilianus on Jan 11, 2019 15:29:31 GMT -5
Coach Gary best in D3, IMO. He's real student of game, and an awesome dude. Will be tough for Vassar to keep him as D1 will come calling soon for an as-coach job. Appropriate username for a comment like this.
|
|
|
Post by proudd3mommy on Jan 12, 2019 23:26:36 GMT -5
New Paltz with a 3-2 over Marian
|
|
|
Post by proudd3mommy on Jan 12, 2019 23:56:42 GMT -5
UCSC getting thrashed by a good North Central Team
|
|
|
Post by stevedraco123 on Jan 14, 2019 2:25:30 GMT -5
Does UCSC’s 3 losses at their own tournament already knock them out of contention for an at-large in April?
|
|
|
Post by goodname on Jan 14, 2019 2:56:54 GMT -5
Does UCSC’s 3 losses at their own tournament already knock them out of contention for an at-large in April? Probably not. With two pool B bids this year they are basically competing with Cal Lu for the second one. Springfield will take the first. The first criteria the NCAA will look at is head to head. Followed by common opponents and then strength of schedule. If UCSC can beat Cal Lu both times they play them and have a higher strength of schedule they could make a strong case. NCAA also has a history of valuing games in the latter half of the season as opposed to the start. Basically long story short is it's too early to tell. But as of right now Cal Lu has the upper hand in common opponents as they beat both Arcadia and North Central that UCSC did not.
|
|
|
Post by tmb on Jan 14, 2019 10:50:02 GMT -5
Is there a scoreboard link somewhere for d3 mvb results? With no D3VB and middle hitter not collecting are they on the AVCA site somewhere (Couldn't find with a quick search) or are conference websites the way to go?
|
|
|
D3 in 2019
Jan 14, 2019 11:42:23 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by goodname on Jan 14, 2019 11:42:23 GMT -5
Is there a scoreboard link somewhere for d3 mvb results? With no D3VB and middle hitter not collecting are they on the AVCA site somewhere (Couldn't find with a quick search) or are conference websites the way to go? While it doesn't appear to be updated here is the NCAA link. www.ncaa.com/scoreboard/volleyball-men/d3
|
|
bodhi
Sophomore
Grow The Game
Posts: 226
|
Post by bodhi on Jan 14, 2019 17:01:32 GMT -5
The following link is one I like to use as they provide pretty comprehensive results (although nothing is listed at present): www.d3vb.org/men/index
|
|
|
Post by tmb on Jan 14, 2019 18:22:11 GMT -5
The following link is one I like to use as they provide pretty comprehensive results (although nothing is listed at present): www.d3vb.org/men/indexThis one has shut down...lack of $$$$$
|
|
|
Post by bbk on Jan 15, 2019 9:33:37 GMT -5
Does UCSC’s 3 losses at their own tournament already knock them out of contention for an at-large in April? Probably not. With two pool B bids this year they are basically competing with Cal Lu for the second one. Springfield will take the first. The first criteria the NCAA will look at is head to head. Followed by common opponents and then strength of schedule. If UCSC can beat Cal Lu both times they play them and have a higher strength of schedule they could make a strong case. NCAA also has a history of valuing games in the latter half of the season as opposed to the start. Basically long story short is it's too early to tell. But as of right now Cal Lu has the upper hand in common opponents as they beat both Arcadia and North Central that UCSC did not. According to the NCAA Division III MVB Annual report released in December 2018 it was announced that there would be 1 Pool B 3 Pool C. Knowing that information UCSC is firmly on the outside of the bubble. The UVC 2nd place - 4th place will be in the mix. The CVC could have 3 teams in contention for an at large. Add in the Benedictine issue (are they or aren't they eligible) and you could have a real mess without even counting Carthage/North Central. UCSC has a long, long road to get to Union, NJ
|
|
|
Post by volleybum14 on Jan 15, 2019 10:15:03 GMT -5
Probably not. With two pool B bids this year they are basically competing with Cal Lu for the second one. Springfield will take the first. The first criteria the NCAA will look at is head to head. Followed by common opponents and then strength of schedule. If UCSC can beat Cal Lu both times they play them and have a higher strength of schedule they could make a strong case. NCAA also has a history of valuing games in the latter half of the season as opposed to the start. Basically long story short is it's too early to tell. But as of right now Cal Lu has the upper hand in common opponents as they beat both Arcadia and North Central that UCSC did not. According to the NCAA Division III MVB Annual report released in December 2018 it was announced that there would be 1 Pool B 3 Pool C. Knowing that information UCSC is firmly on the outside of the bubble. The UVC 2nd place - 4th place will be in the mix. The CVC could have 3 teams in contention for an at large. Add in the Benedictine issue (are they or aren't they eligible) and you could have a real mess without even counting Carthage/North Central. UCSC has a long, long road to get to Union, NJ Also, they’re just not that good
|
|
|
Post by proudd3mommy on Jan 15, 2019 10:16:30 GMT -5
Probably not. With two pool B bids this year they are basically competing with Cal Lu for the second one. Springfield will take the first. The first criteria the NCAA will look at is head to head. Followed by common opponents and then strength of schedule. If UCSC can beat Cal Lu both times they play them and have a higher strength of schedule they could make a strong case. NCAA also has a history of valuing games in the latter half of the season as opposed to the start. Basically long story short is it's too early to tell. But as of right now Cal Lu has the upper hand in common opponents as they beat both Arcadia and North Central that UCSC did not. According to the NCAA Division III MVB Annual report released in December 2018 it was announced that there would be 1 Pool B 3 Pool C. Knowing that information UCSC is firmly on the outside of the bubble. The UVC 2nd place - 4th place will be in the mix. The CVC could have 3 teams in contention for an at large. Add in the Benedictine issue (are they or aren't they eligible) and you could have a real mess without even counting Carthage/North Central. UCSC has a long, long road to get to Union, NJ I agree, UCSC is pretty much done. If they can't even win at home it'll be a lot tougher on the road after hours of travel. I'd be surprised if they win two games this weekend at the Jim Coleman Invitational - Springfield, Ohio. Better off taking teams from the UVC or CVC instead. I'll expect this tournament to be a mess with every team losing at least once. The only team I could see winning all their games would be Carthage.
|
|
|
D3 in 2019
Jan 15, 2019 12:12:29 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by stevedraco123 on Jan 15, 2019 12:12:29 GMT -5
Probably not. With two pool B bids this year they are basically competing with Cal Lu for the second one. Springfield will take the first. The first criteria the NCAA will look at is head to head. Followed by common opponents and then strength of schedule. If UCSC can beat Cal Lu both times they play them and have a higher strength of schedule they could make a strong case. NCAA also has a history of valuing games in the latter half of the season as opposed to the start. Basically long story short is it's too early to tell. But as of right now Cal Lu has the upper hand in common opponents as they beat both Arcadia and North Central that UCSC did not. According to the NCAA Division III MVB Annual report released in December 2018 it was announced that there would be 1 Pool B 3 Pool C. Knowing that information UCSC is firmly on the outside of the bubble. The UVC 2nd place - 4th place will be in the mix. The CVC could have 3 teams in contention for an at large. Add in the Benedictine issue (are they or aren't they eligible) and you could have a real mess without even counting Carthage/North Central. UCSC has a long, long road to get to Union, NJ Does anyone have any insight on whether Benedictine is eligible or not?
|
|