|
UCLA
Feb 7, 2019 14:44:21 GMT -5
Post by itsallrelative on Feb 7, 2019 14:44:21 GMT -5
Ucla always at the top in women's volleyball was Banacowski that great or did everybody else catch up? Banachowski knew how to recruit great players And the great players were more concentrated in Cali....
|
|
|
UCLA
Feb 7, 2019 14:55:21 GMT -5
Post by hammer on Feb 7, 2019 14:55:21 GMT -5
Banachowski knew how to recruit great players And the great players were more concentrated in Cali.... Andy did not leave the cupboard bare. Academics and location make UCLA a fairly easy recruit and the pool of local recruits is large. If you attract one or two solid out-state/foreign recruits per year and in-fill with CA kids, you should be top 20 every year, assuming you can coach.
|
|
|
Post by pepperbrooks on Feb 7, 2019 14:56:44 GMT -5
Banachowski knew how to recruit great players And the great players were more concentrated in Cali.... Banachowski did recruit a lot of out-of-state kids as well, especially in the later years, a lot of phenomenal athletes like Porter and Kim Krull.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Feb 7, 2019 17:34:27 GMT -5
And the great players were more concentrated in Cali.... Banachowski did recruit a lot of out-of-state kids as well, especially in the later years, a lot of phenomenal athletes like Porter and Kim Krull. Didn't Banachowski recruit Mari Hole all the way from Norway?
|
|
|
UCLA
Feb 7, 2019 18:46:54 GMT -5
Post by ay2013 on Feb 7, 2019 18:46:54 GMT -5
And the great players were more concentrated in Cali.... Andy did not leave the cupboard bare. Academics and location make UCLA a fairly easy recruit and the pool of local recruits is large. If you attract one or two solid out-state/foreign recruits per year and in-fill with CA kids, you should be top 20 every year, assuming you can coach. I think this is over simplifying recruiting in California. The pool of local recruits actually is NOT that large when the best players are being heavily recruited by other Pac 12 schools and national powerhouses. All things considered, over Sealys tenure, he actually is pulling in a decent share of the top 10 California recruits when you factor in that Stanford and USC are also in state and the top Big 10 and Texas poke their damn heads in from time to time (YBG, Sun, Gray). More importantly, I’d argue that almost every year UCLA is a top 20-25 team.
|
|
|
UCLA
Feb 7, 2019 19:57:24 GMT -5
donut likes this
Post by BRUINWALKER on Feb 7, 2019 19:57:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
UCLA
Feb 7, 2019 20:47:16 GMT -5
Post by pepperbrooks on Feb 7, 2019 20:47:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by brooselee on Feb 7, 2019 21:35:37 GMT -5
I think you got the school mixed up. It’s University of Portland of the WCC not Portland State from the Big Sky.
|
|
|
UCLA
Feb 7, 2019 23:01:10 GMT -5
Post by BRUINWALKER on Feb 7, 2019 23:01:10 GMT -5
I think you got the school mixed up. It’s University of Portland of the WCC not Portland State from the Big Sky. You are correct. My apologizes.
|
|
|
UCLA
Feb 7, 2019 23:27:40 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by jengal on Feb 7, 2019 23:27:40 GMT -5
I think you got the school mixed up. It’s University of Portland of the WCC not Portland State from the Big Sky. You are correct. My apologizes. I went to University of Portland...it gets mixed up with Portland State ALL THE TIME, even by people in Portland!
|
|
|
UCLA
Feb 8, 2019 11:48:42 GMT -5
Post by itsallrelative on Feb 8, 2019 11:48:42 GMT -5
Andy did not leave the cupboard bare. Academics and location make UCLA a fairly easy recruit and the pool of local recruits is large. If you attract one or two solid out-state/foreign recruits per year and in-fill with CA kids, you should be top 20 every year, assuming you can coach. I think this is over simplifying recruiting in California. The pool of local recruits actually is NOT that large when the best players are being heavily recruited by other Pac 12 schools and national powerhouses. All things considered, over Sealys tenure, he actually is pulling in a decent share of the top 10 California recruits when you factor in that Stanford and USC are also in state and the top Big 10 and Texas poke their damn heads in from time to time (YBG, Sun, Gray). More importantly, I’d argue that almost every year UCLA is a top 20-25 team. My point was...in Andy B's heyday, the pool of recruits was more concentrated in Cali than it is today....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
UCLA
Feb 8, 2019 11:50:59 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2019 11:50:59 GMT -5
You are correct. My apologizes. I went to University of Portland...it gets mixed up with Portland State ALL THE TIME, even by people in Portland! Ok, so now I am confused. Is the setter that is transferring to UCLA coming from the school that the USC coach, coached at? ie. Did Sealy just recruit a setter that the USC HC originally recruited?
|
|
|
UCLA
Feb 8, 2019 12:16:34 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by eldorado on Feb 8, 2019 12:16:34 GMT -5
You’re not confused at all
|
|
|
UCLA
Feb 8, 2019 13:04:04 GMT -5
Post by collegebeachfan on Feb 8, 2019 13:04:04 GMT -5
Instead of taking the second tier local kids, maybe now Sealy can take a top tier one from Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, etc.... It give Sealy more prospects to choose from and not have to settle for second tier ones. I have been wondering if most California kids are playing beach and indoor as youth and are not maximizing their indoor potential by playing both sports.....thus draining the pool of top notch indoor players. Just a wild thought. broose - I don't think that's the case yet. If you look at the top indoor players in the state (calhisports.com all state team) surprisingly few of them spend a lot of time in the sand. And the top beach-only high school girls (i.e. not playing club indoor) are incredibly talented and athletic but very few of them are over 6' and would have been recruited as front row players by top indoor programs.
|
|
|
UCLA
Feb 8, 2019 13:13:47 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Disc808 on Feb 8, 2019 13:13:47 GMT -5
I mean Sealy did recruit Mac May and Mosser who were both top out of state recruits
|
|