|
Post by itsallrelative on May 12, 2019 15:00:31 GMT -5
Also, make sure you scroll all the way to the right. Not all people on this list are suspended for sex offenders....
|
|
|
Post by Mark Richards on May 12, 2019 16:17:39 GMT -5
Also, make sure you scroll all the way to the right. Not all people on this list are suspended for sex offenders.... Witch hunt thread that should be removed.
|
|
|
Post by justahick on May 12, 2019 18:32:54 GMT -5
Also, not everyone on the list is a coach. And the suspensions of some of the people are over.
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on May 12, 2019 18:41:34 GMT -5
Thread that harms innocent people. It should be removed from the board.
|
|
|
Post by pepperbrooks on May 12, 2019 19:01:06 GMT -5
Thread that harms innocent people. It should be removed from the board. How?
|
|
|
Post by ironhammer on May 12, 2019 22:14:24 GMT -5
On that note, the political nut jobs out here in CA thought it would be a great idea to not make it mandatory for a convicted pedophile to have to register as a sex offender. After all we don't want to discriminate against anybody's sexual preferences. . . SB384 (Thank you GOV. Brown) allows pedophiles to be removed from the list 10 years after released from prison if they haven't been convicted of any additional sex crimes. And then we have the recent bill drafted by Sen. Weiner (Dem), SB145 which will not make it mandatory for a pedophile to register in CA if their victim(s) are less than 10 years younger than themselves. We sure have a whole lot of special people out here. Ummmmm....how did this thread turned to discussion of politics? I don't know what's going on with you pal, but maybe you need to take chill pill?
|
|
|
Post by ironhammer on May 12, 2019 22:50:04 GMT -5
Ummmmm....how did this thread turned to discussion of politics? I don't know what's going on with you pal, but maybe you need to take chill pill? I am absolutely chill. No need for any meds here. The progression of the discussion was quite simple. We were discussing the suspended coaches list. Somebody pointed out that all those suspended weren't suspended for sexual related issues. Then someone suggested requirements to register as a sex offender. You then brought up how different states have their own rules about sexual offender registration. Which brought me to my comment about the nut-job politicians out here and their nut-job supporters who think that it shouldn't be mandatory for a convicted child rapist to be on the registration list. I typed slowly so you could keep up It's not your typing speed but your political agenda that is the issue.
|
|
|
Post by ironhammer on May 12, 2019 23:24:29 GMT -5
It's not your typing speed but your political agenda that is the issue. My ideology is convicted pedophiles should have to register as sex offenders for life. I'll make no apologies for that stance and I will not support politicians who believe otherwise. There are two sides to every story. I need to read the bill and the rationale and context behind it carefully. Political motivations are never so pure or one-sided.
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on May 13, 2019 11:15:23 GMT -5
Also, not everyone on the list is a coach. And the suspensions of some of the people are over. This is a terrible thread.
|
|
|
Post by ineedajob on May 13, 2019 11:23:16 GMT -5
Thread that harms innocent people. It should be removed from the board. How? bigfan Reiterating this question. Can you provide an example of how this thread harms someone who is innocent?
|
|
|
Post by Hawk Attack on May 13, 2019 11:33:46 GMT -5
bigfan Reiterating this question. Can you provide an example of how this thread harms someone who is innocent? RE: Wade from Hawaii
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on May 13, 2019 12:08:28 GMT -5
Thread that harms innocent people. It should be removed from the board. How? This thread serves no purpose.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2019 12:11:05 GMT -5
bigfan Reiterating this question. Can you provide an example of how this thread harms someone who is innocent? RE: Wade from Hawaii did it really, though?
|
|
|
Post by ineedajob on May 13, 2019 12:26:23 GMT -5
This thread serves no purpose. That doesn't answer the question. You don't think that people reading and posting on VolleyTalk shouldn't be interested in who appears on this list? If you don't think it serves a purpose, don't read it. If you think this thread should be deleted for causing "harm to innocent people," provide how you came to that conclusion. There are many other threads which "serve no purpose" from my point-of-view, but that doesn't mean others aren't interested in it.
|
|
|
Post by Hawk Attack on May 13, 2019 12:39:43 GMT -5
Well your OP says you “think it's important for our community to be updated about coaches that violate the governing codes of conduct”. And since some people on that list are, for example, “Pending Investigation U.S. Center for SafeSport” and have not been proven to violate governing codes of conduct I would say if it’s not harmful it is, at the very least, misleading.
|
|