|
|
Post by volleyguy on Dec 21, 2019 19:51:19 GMT -5
Those are false choices insofar as they are not the only options available if there were to be a court decision striking down or invalidating provisions of Title IX. The first step would probably be to eliminate some sports entirely until the minimum number of sports required to be NCAA eligible is reached (that assumes that number isn't changed by the NCAA in response). That is a far more probable response than an institution adding sports to achieve equivalency. Which would run directly into the continuing progress prong that most football schools opt for to remain in compliance while remaining otherwise out of compliance. That is the third compliance prong, but no school has availed themselves of it, because they know they'd immediately be sued. I don't know how likely or unlikely that would be. If it does happen I suspect it would be a narrow decision, disallowing reverse discrimination, while leaving Title IX, itself, intact. The "prongs" you are referring to are the internal reasoning and procedures used by the OCR, the Dept of Education enforcement arm for Title IX, to determine compliance, and are not included in the actual language of Title IX. A court decision, narrow or otherwise, must either invalidate the actual language of the statute, or determine that the enforcement procedures have been misapplied. Neither of those actions is likely to result in a narrow effect on the impact of Title IX. |
|
|
|
Post by Mocha on Dec 21, 2019 20:06:09 GMT -5
I'm guessing one reason women dominate this sport is because it's called "women's volleyball". 🤔
|
|
|
|
Post by vbjustice on Dec 21, 2019 20:38:49 GMT -5
Oooof Sheffield took a real “L” with this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Dec 21, 2019 21:04:52 GMT -5
The new early recruiting rules could take some of the stress and grind out of coaching, making it easier for female coaches to balance family and career. Less need to chase and babysit 13- and 14-year-olds.
|
|
|
|
Post by volleyloa on Dec 21, 2019 21:08:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by milkmandan on Dec 21, 2019 22:24:06 GMT -5
Booth could have coached at Stanford
Salima Rockwell could have taken over Penn State
Christy Johnson-Lynch could have officially become the heir apparent at Nebraska
Let's stop asking why they aren't getting chances and start asking what's keeping them from taking the job? There are national systemic barriers and social conventions that keep a lot of women from reaching for the brass ring. Mary Wise covered some of it in her FF press conference in 2017.
|
|
|
|
Post by Word on Dec 23, 2019 15:34:33 GMT -5
Booth could have coached at Stanford Salima Rockwell could have taken over Penn State Christy Johnson-Lynch could have officially become the heir apparent at Nebraska Let's stop asking why they aren't getting chances and start asking what's keeping them from taking the job? There are national systemic barriers and social conventions that keep a lot of women from reaching for the brass ring. Mary Wise covered some of it in her FF press conference in 2017. The question isn't that difficult to find a reasoning behind as well. What are the four biggest female sports? Volleyball, Basketball, Soccer, and Softball. Of those, volleyball is the only one that has a men's version that is very small. Where do the men's players go after playing to start coaching? There's very little opportunity to pursue a career in Men's volleyball. The only avenue is to coach Women's. Basketball there's plenty of opportunity to stay on the Men's side, same with soccer, and softball is exclusively a women's sports, but baseball has plenty of opportunity's for former players. Volleyball is the ONLY sport like this which is why you see the discrepancy so much more. Like the previous poster said, some make the same fuss over and over about no woman has won a title. Yet KBB CHOSE to not take the Stanford job and stay at Creighton. She would have won a title and this question would be mute if she left Creighton. |
|
|
|
Post by oldunc on Dec 23, 2019 17:45:15 GMT -5
Booth could have coached at Stanford Salima Rockwell could have taken over Penn State Christy Johnson-Lynch could have officially become the heir apparent at Nebraska Let's stop asking why they aren't getting chances and start asking what's keeping them from taking the job? There are national systemic barriers and social conventions that keep a lot of women from reaching for the brass ring. Mary Wise covered some of it in her FF press conference in 2017. The question isn't that difficult to find a reasoning behind as well. What are the four biggest female sports? Volleyball, Basketball, Soccer, and Softball. Of those, volleyball is the only one that has a men's version that is very small. Where do the men's players go after playing to start coaching? There's very little opportunity to pursue a career in Men's volleyball. The only avenue is to coach Women's. Basketball there's plenty of opportunity to stay on the Men's side, same with soccer, and softball is exclusively a women's sports, but baseball has plenty of opportunity's for former players. Volleyball is the ONLY sport like this which is why you see the discrepancy so much more. Like the previous poster said, some make the same fuss over and over about no woman has won a title. Yet KBB CHOSE to not take the Stanford job and stay at Creighton. She would have won a title and this question would be mute if she left Creighton. There are few opportunities in men's volleyball, there are also relatively few players, from which group almost all of the candidates come. There should be many times more female potential coaches. |
|
|
|
Post by jaypak on Dec 23, 2019 20:35:00 GMT -5
Yet KBB CHOSE to not take the Stanford job and stay at Creighton. She would have won a title and this question would be mute if she left Creighton. It will become a moot point anyway when she wins a title at Creighton!  |
|
|
|
Post by Upfrontvb on Dec 23, 2019 22:15:55 GMT -5
AGAIN🥺. This topic comes up every year.......yawn.
|
|
