Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2020 17:38:20 GMT -5
Now that so many FIVB events have been cancelled, the qualification standards look like they need some modification for Tokyo 2021. The initial dates for qualification were from June 1, 2018 - June 28, 2020. Assuming they just move that up for one year (June 1, 2019 - June 28, 2020) who does that hurt the most? I am guessing that there are some teams with great results from June 1, 2018 - June 1, 2019 that will not be counted, but I do not have that data on hand (relying on all of you for that!). What do you think the standards will look like? Will they change at all now that all June events have been cancelled? Current Men's RankingsCurrent Women's RankingsTokyo Qualification System |
|
|
|
Post by tamz on Mar 31, 2020 0:15:56 GMT -5
If they move everything up one year, then shouldn’t all teams still have the # of events locked down up to date?
Maybe they should scrap Doha since some teams couldn’t make it because of the virus?
|
|
|
|
Post by guest2 on Mar 31, 2020 1:43:05 GMT -5
Now that so many FIVB events have been cancelled, the qualification standards look like they need some modification for Tokyo 2021. The initial dates for qualification were from June 1, 2018 - June 28, 2020. Assuming they just move that up for one year (June 1, 2019 - June 28, 2020) who does that hurt the most? I am guessing that there are some teams with great results from June 1, 2018 - June 1, 2019 that will not be counted, but I do not have that data on hand (relying on all of you for that!). What do you think the standards will look like? Will they change at all now that all June events have been cancelled? Current Men's RankingsCurrent Women's RankingsTokyo Qualification SystemIn theory it would hurt teams that had good early results and so played fewer events or perhaps took their foot off the gas a little. But the big question is will Brazil re-open qualification. If not the only real points of interest are Russian men and American women. All other medal contenders are pretty certain to qualify absent an injury |
|
|
|
Post by ramo2653 on Apr 2, 2020 19:19:06 GMT -5
If Brazil did, then I wonder if Ana Patrica and Duda would link up again.
|
|
|
|
Post by grtorres on Apr 2, 2020 22:50:21 GMT -5
Now that so many FIVB events have been cancelled, the qualification standards look like they need some modification for Tokyo 2021. The initial dates for qualification were from June 1, 2018 - June 28, 2020. Assuming they just move that up for one year (June 1, 2019 - June 28, 2020) who does that hurt the most? I am guessing that there are some teams with great results from June 1, 2018 - June 1, 2019 that will not be counted, but I do not have that data on hand (relying on all of you for that!). What do you think the standards will look like? Will they change at all now that all June events have been cancelled? Current Men's RankingsCurrent Women's RankingsTokyo Qualification SystemIn theory it would hurt teams that had good early results and so played fewer events or perhaps took their foot off the gas a little. But the big question is will Brazil re-open qualification. If not the only real points of interest are Russian men and American women. All other medal contenders are pretty certain to qualify absent an injury No chance Brazil re-opens qualification. |
|
|
|
Post by guest2 on Apr 2, 2020 23:49:28 GMT -5
In theory it would hurt teams that had good early results and so played fewer events or perhaps took their foot off the gas a little. But the big question is will Brazil re-open qualification. If not the only real points of interest are Russian men and American women. All other medal contenders are pretty certain to qualify absent an injury No chance Brazil re-opens qualification. I get why they wouldnt but selecting the team 20 months before an event is dumb. 36 to 38 as an undersized blocker? I love Agatha but if I were Brazil Id like to take my time on annointing her |
|
