|
Post by Fight On! on Jan 25, 2021 18:56:57 GMT -5
Everyone okay with a couple late ones in the mix? In the interest of getting this league up and rolling with as many participants as possible, and the fect that the first match of the week is still three hours away, I'm totally good with it. We can get anal starting next week. And following up on FightOn!'s question about players being available for multiple rosters, maybe starting next week we could have a lock out rule in place for one player. For anyone who submits their lineup 48 hours or more before the deadline, you can lay sole claim to one of your players that week. I'm not sure how this will play out, but to avoid it being a weekly Garcia grabfest, perhaps we should make it so you cannot lock onto the same player more than once during a season. Maybe have at most three locked out players each week? It's a work in progress. My goal is to reward people willing to expose their strategy or insights, but it has to not turn it into a free-for-all where people are submitting week 12 lineups during week 3. Please toss your feedback into the pile. On that note, I'll enter the last entries and good luck to all. I am fine with the late adds since no matches have started. I am pretty agnostic on the lock-out thing, except it seems like a lot to track.
|
|
|
Post by wilbur on Jan 25, 2021 20:06:14 GMT -5
Everyone okay with a couple late ones in the mix? In the interest of getting this league up and rolling with as many participants as possible, and the fect that the first match of the week is still three hours away, I'm totally good with it. We can get anal starting next week. And following up on FightOn!'s question about players being available for multiple rosters, maybe starting next week we could have a lock out rule in place for one player. For anyone who submits their lineup 48 hours or more before the deadline, you can lay sole claim to one of your players that week. I'm not sure how this will play out, but to avoid it being a weekly Garcia grabfest, perhaps we should make it so you cannot lock onto the same player more than once during a season. Maybe have at most three locked out players each week? It's a work in progress. My goal is to reward people willing to expose their strategy or insights, but it has to not turn it into a free-for-all where people are submitting week 12 lineups during week 3. Please toss your feedback into the pile. On that note, I'll enter the last entries and good luck to all. I am OK with all that, I was 5 minutes past deadline so hopefully a one time exception can be made. I was 50/50 on joining and took me 20 minutes to figure out who to pick.
|
|
|
Post by wilbur on Jan 25, 2021 20:20:42 GMT -5
OH: Hoppe, Concordia (MPSF) OPP: Sharfenaker, LMU (IVA) MB: Hippe, Ball State (MIVA) S: Swabinsky, SFU (EIVA) Very nice, going Hip Hop in week 1. thanks for pointing out! makes me feel better about not picking a certain other middle in the EIVA on Lewis that may score more... I was rushing and 5 minutes after I hit the button I realized my oversight. I am surprised no one grabbed him but I guess Coenen is too good to pass up even though he will play 2 matches to other conference's 3. Landon Krause is pretty tempting too as a true freshman that put up huge numbers in the last game, see what he can do this week.
|
|
|
Post by Fight On! on Jan 25, 2021 22:17:14 GMT -5
Whelp, I am done for. Why they list him as a OH and play him as an OPP and then list Schutt as an OPP and play him as a MB is beyond me and kinda annoying. Lol
|
|
|
Post by wilbur on Jan 26, 2021 0:56:42 GMT -5
Whelp, I am done for. Why they list him as a OH and play him as an OPP and then list Schutt as an OPP and play him as a MB is beyond me and kinda annoying. Lol He was listed as a OH last year too, SI dept probably hasn't edited since he was a freshman
|
|
|
Post by lipton on Jan 26, 2021 1:10:22 GMT -5
Whelp, I am done for. Why they list him as a OH and play him as an OPP and then list Schutt as an OPP and play him as a MB is beyond me and kinda annoying. Lol We can commiserate. I'm wondering why Nido is still listed on the updated NJIT active roster if he had no plans to play there this season. All of these roster hiccups will over soon thank goodness.
|
|
|
Post by ucsdfan on Jan 26, 2021 22:11:46 GMT -5
So it looks like a "no" on the locking a player in idea. I figured I'd run it out there after extrapolating from a comment in this thread.
I posted game numbers from last night on the week 1 post. If you get something different, let me know.
With games getting cancelled left and right, I assume we are all going to be submitting weekly lineups at the very last second. That will work out well. This is going to be crazy and thrilling. Hopefully we can get a couple more people on board.
|
|
|
Post by Fight On! on Jan 27, 2021 23:14:54 GMT -5
Woohoo! Barsemian is playing OH tonight!
|
|
|
Post by wilbur on Jan 27, 2021 23:45:18 GMT -5
Woohoo! Barsemian is playing OH tonight! 86 pts in 3 game loss... more than hoppe in 8 games played! we will see what happens it third match of week... hoppe might be on the bench... CI looked like crap, except Barsemian.
|
|
|
Post by ucsdfan on Jan 28, 2021 0:06:08 GMT -5
Barsemian went off. 86 points, Vigo got 36, and Hoppe 21.
No doubt Patchell will keep changing the lineup, he always does. Benching Hoppe is a possibility, as that would help with serve receive. Bold move to put two terrible passers in serve receiving postions, which is why he went with a passing opposite at times. Maybe we can start a new contest where you have to guess Patchell's lineup. That'd be like playing lottery in terms of the odds.
|
|
|
Post by Fight On! on Jan 28, 2021 21:11:42 GMT -5
Wow. Bad night for Reardon and abysmal night for Carvalho
Edit: much more interesting match tonight.
|
|
|
Post by ucsdfan on Jan 30, 2021 8:31:47 GMT -5
I just upadted the numbers as of Friday (week 1). Should be an exciting last day of matches, given that some players might not play, others may be at a differnt position, and everyone here has at least three players on the their roster with matches.
|
|
|
Post by Fight On! on Jan 30, 2021 17:43:51 GMT -5
It looks like the whole match will come down to whether Barsamian plays outside or opposite tonight.
|
|
|
Post by ucsdfan on Jan 30, 2021 18:02:46 GMT -5
Yeah, I was just going to post that. The numbers are up-to-date right now. Really close contest.
|
|
|
Post by Fight On! on Jan 30, 2021 22:38:00 GMT -5
... and !!!!###$$$!!! me!
|
|