|
|
Post by volleyfan24 on Apr 19, 2021 13:42:39 GMT -5
Go Washington
|
|
|
|
Post by huskervolleyball on Apr 19, 2021 13:42:42 GMT -5
Lockwood and Vazquez Gomez >>> Lund lmao
|
|
|
|
Post by basil on Apr 19, 2021 13:42:49 GMT -5
good serve by Calle to cause the overpass.
|
|
|
|
Post by huskervolleyball on Apr 19, 2021 13:43:11 GMT -5
Washington two points away
|
|
|
|
Post by basil on Apr 19, 2021 13:43:13 GMT -5
Ndee's back on the court. There's still time for Pitt.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilikecorn on Apr 19, 2021 13:43:14 GMT -5
13-7
|
|
|
|
Post by vup on Apr 19, 2021 13:43:19 GMT -5
I'm surprised Pitt didn't challenge that.
|
|
|
|
Post by huskervolleyball on Apr 19, 2021 13:43:39 GMT -5
There's Starks!
|
|
|
|
Post by basil on Apr 19, 2021 13:43:51 GMT -5
Hoffman shows up in the tight moments. Last set and this one. Really clutch.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilikecorn on Apr 19, 2021 13:44:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by pbmu on Apr 19, 2021 13:44:05 GMT -5
Clutch Claire
|
|
|
|
Post by huskervolleyball on Apr 19, 2021 13:44:11 GMT -5
Grote on the slide. Match point Huskies!
|
|
|
|
Post by ilikecorn on Apr 19, 2021 13:44:17 GMT -5
Match point HUSKIES!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Apr 19, 2021 13:44:20 GMT -5
That was still a bullsh*t challenge overturn on that over the net call, but now that Washington has won the set, I guess it doesn't matter anymore. I'm guessing you don't like the rule. It was legally challenged and rightfully overturned. If the reverse happened to UW, if you hate the rule, I guess you'd be consistent. No, that's the whole point. It wasn't legally challenged. Whether the ball was over the net or not is not a challengeable call. I actually would prefer if it was a challengeable call, but it's not. It's considered a real-time judgement call, just like a double touch. |
|
|
|
Post by ilikecorn on Apr 19, 2021 13:44:33 GMT -5
|
|
