|
Post by ltdks01 on Apr 23, 2021 16:09:10 GMT -5
Name 3 consistently terminal hitters on all those teams pls. Wisconsin might be the only team that kinda does. Oh. Now it’s 3. Inflation. more than 2 means at least 3... from the get go they said “more than 2”. No inflation here
|
|
|
Post by diggerdive on Apr 23, 2021 16:14:44 GMT -5
Oh. Now it’s 3. Inflation. more than 2 means at least 3... from the get go they said “more than 2”. No inflation here YOU GOT ME!
|
|
|
Post by Veeber on Apr 23, 2021 16:18:10 GMT -5
Are you asking for consistently terminal hitters or real offensive threats? Those are two different things but here you go: PSU: Parker, Horde, (Fitzpatrick) slight reach ok Neb: Sun, caffey, stivrins, kubik Wis: Robinson, Rettke, Haggerty, loberg Bay: Pressley, Harrison, (Van der mark) when healthy which she was for 2 of the UT matches
Though some are more streaky than others, all these names proved that they are offensive threats this season.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2021 16:18:38 GMT -5
I wonder how Kentucky's blocking and floor defense will fare against Texas. I think Kentucky's pins are better than Wisconsin's forsure. floor defense is always excellent. Even against the big teams like Florida, Purdue, and Washington. Blocking is a concern though. Texas hits over most blocks anyway though so hopefully that won’t matter as much. Lilley is going to negate the Texas block quite a bit if UK passes well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2021 16:19:37 GMT -5
Are you asking for consistently terminal hitters or real offensive threats? Those are two different things but here you go: PSU: Parker, Horde, (Fitzpatrick) slight reach ok Neb: Sun, caffey, stivrins, kubik Wis: Robinson, Rettke, Haggerty, loberg Bay: Pressley, Harrison, (Van der mark) when healthy which she was for 2 of the UT matches Though some are more streaky than others, all these names proved that they are offensive threats this season. VDM and Loberg ? Offensive threats ? Oh sweetie
|
|
|
Post by vbsam16 on Apr 23, 2021 16:20:47 GMT -5
Girl name one team Texas has played that had more than 2 real offensive threats this season. Baylor, Nebraska, Wisconsin, (penn state is arguably in there) - have had 2 or 3 solid offensive options. Perhaps the better question a UK fan should prepare for is when did Kentucky last face a Butler (hit over .600 against the #1 team), an O’Neal (hit over .600 against the #1 team), three solid DS/liberos, Logan and Skylar on the OH. Sure you can focus on your two “big” guns. Good luck. Wisconsin is the only team you listed that has more than 2 starters with a hitting percentage over .300 on the season. I take that with a grain of salt too considering they had one of the easiest schedules of any P5 team. And while I know Dooley isn't some monster at the net hitting wise, she averages 1.4 blocks/set, plus Forte literally just hit .588 against the #1 team. I'm not saying Texas is some team Kentucky has played before. I was just glad Kentucky got practice against one of the best blocking teams in the country right before they play another one of the best blocking teams in the country. And that Texas hasn't faced a team with every single starter hitting over .300 on the season lol
|
|
|
Post by Veeber on Apr 23, 2021 16:22:57 GMT -5
Are you asking for consistently terminal hitters or real offensive threats? Those are two different things but here you go: PSU: Parker, Horde, (Fitzpatrick) slight reach ok Neb: Sun, caffey, stivrins, kubik Wis: Robinson, Rettke, Haggerty, loberg Bay: Pressley, Harrison, (Van der mark) when healthy which she was for 2 of the UT matches Though some are more streaky than others, all these names proved that they are offensive threats this season. VDM and Loberg ? Offensive threats ? Oh sweetie Loberg: 2.75 k/s hitting .254 as an OH. That is for sure an offensive threat. VDM: numbers aren't great. ok I'll give ya that one.
|
|
|
Post by vbsam16 on Apr 23, 2021 16:25:18 GMT -5
Glad this thread is getting a little livelier. Was my goal teehee.
|
|
|
Post by blackiechan1999 on Apr 23, 2021 16:25:33 GMT -5
Baylor, Nebraska, Wisconsin, (penn state is arguably in there) - have had 2 or 3 solid offensive options. Perhaps the better question a UK fan should prepare for is when did Kentucky last face a Butler (hit over .600 against the #1 team), an O’Neal (hit over .600 against the #1 team), three solid DS/liberos, Logan and Skylar on the OH. Sure you can focus on your two “big” guns. Good luck. Wisconsin is the only team you listed that has more than 2 starters with a hitting percentage over .300 on the season. I take that with a grain of salt too considering they had one of the easiest schedules of any P5 team. And while I know Dooley isn't some monster at the net hitting wise, she averages 1.4 blocks/set, plus Forte literally just hit .588 against the #1 team. I'm not saying Texas is some team Kentucky has played before. I was just glad Kentucky got practice against one of the best blocking teams in the country right before they play another one of the best blocking teams in the country. And that Texas hasn't faced a team with every single starter hitting over .300 on the season lol I think you’re forgetting that every single Texas hitter is hitting over .300 on the season as well....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2021 16:25:39 GMT -5
VDM and Loberg ? Offensive threats ? Oh sweetie Loberg: 2.75 k/s hitting .254 as an OH. That is for sure an offensive threat. VDM: numbers aren't great. ok I'll give ya that one. glad Loberg “stuffed” her HP to 254 against MSU and Maryland but hit 0 against Florida and 103 against Texas
|
|
|
Post by eazy on Apr 23, 2021 16:26:12 GMT -5
Can I make you dinner and rub your feet too? I'm afraid I'm definitely out of your league. It's a shame that you can't even think of 1 other thing to worry about when facing Texas other than them being tall, despite claiming to have 9 other things. I can think of 3-4 more because they are a very good team, but I was expecting you to back up your claim for some reason.
|
|
|
Post by vbsam16 on Apr 23, 2021 16:26:31 GMT -5
Wisconsin is the only team you listed that has more than 2 starters with a hitting percentage over .300 on the season. I take that with a grain of salt too considering they had one of the easiest schedules of any P5 team. And while I know Dooley isn't some monster at the net hitting wise, she averages 1.4 blocks/set, plus Forte literally just hit .588 against the #1 team. I'm not saying Texas is some team Kentucky has played before. I was just glad Kentucky got practice against one of the best blocking teams in the country right before they play another one of the best blocking teams in the country. And that Texas hasn't faced a team with every single starter hitting over .300 on the season lol I think you’re forgetting that every single Texas hitter is hitting over .300 on the season as well.... Girl when did I say that they weren't?
|
|
|
Post by blackiechan1999 on Apr 23, 2021 16:27:33 GMT -5
I think you’re forgetting that every single Texas hitter is hitting over .300 on the season as well.... Girl when did I say that they weren't? So has Kentucky faced a team where every hitter is hitting over .300?
|
|
|
Post by vbsam16 on Apr 23, 2021 16:29:05 GMT -5
Girl when did I say that they weren't? So has Kentucky faced a team where every hitter is hitting over .300? I never said Kentucky has and that wasn't the argument I was making...I said I'm glad Kentucky has faced a good blocking team already and that Texas hasn't had to block against so many good hitters on one team...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2021 16:29:45 GMT -5
If we go position by position here which I know doesn’t always work. S Big Advantage UK OH I’m gonna say wash because of both UK OHs being threats out of the back row and fields isn’t an option there. MB big advantage Texas RS Advantage UK L advantage UK DS I’d say advantage UK but Tharp had a really off night last night so maybe wash.
|
|