|
Post by HOLIDAY on Mar 6, 2022 20:24:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Mar 6, 2022 20:45:14 GMT -5
People are going to bristle when I say this but it's straight out of the Democratic Party playbook. Republicans were labelled as racist and not wanting to see African Americans as homeowners. Because of this they backed off of Fannie Mae/ Freddie Mac which lead to the buying of homes by people who could not afford them. When homes were foreclosed on, corporations swooped in and bought them and are now turning a profit renting those homes.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Mar 6, 2022 20:47:05 GMT -5
People are going to bristle when I say this but it's straight out of the Democratic Party playbook. Republicans were labelled as racist and not wanting to see African Americans as homeowners. Because of this they backed off of Fannie Mae/ Freddie Mac which lead to the buying of homes by people who could not afford them. When homes were foreclosed on, corporations swooped in and bought them and are now turning a profit renting those homes. and Stacey knows how to pressure corporations doesn't she? The baseball situation turned out to be a big loser for her however. It cost her city literally millions of dollars.
|
|
|
Post by longboards on Mar 6, 2022 21:05:14 GMT -5
First article - She is pointing out that the companies that left Georgia in protest over what they believed to be minority suppressive voting laws actually negatively impacts minorities. Second article is an opinion piece pretty much saying she lost and get over it. I agree, if you lose an election and cannot prove any foul play, you should accept the election results and shut your trap. If you believe the law favors or disfavors a particular group, advocate for better election laws. Do you agree?
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Mar 6, 2022 21:12:09 GMT -5
First article - She is pointing out that the companies that left Georgia in protest over what they believed to be minority suppressive voting laws actually negatively impacts minorities. Second article is an opinion piece pretty much saying she lost and get over it. I agree, if you lose an election and cannot prove any foul play, you should accept the election results and shut your trap. If you believe the law favors or disfavors a particular group, advocate for better election laws. Do you agree? So she was part of pressuring companies to do what she wanted or she would brand them racist. What a delighful person. She refused to accept the results for quite a while( much like Donald). She doesn't reallly care about fair election laws. She wants to win. If you dont realize that I would like to sell you some nebraska farmground that is ocean front. You could be Geddy's neighbor.
|
|
|
Post by longboards on Mar 6, 2022 21:15:41 GMT -5
First article - She is pointing out that the companies that left Georgia in protest over what they believed to be minority suppressive voting laws actually negatively impacts minorities. Second article is an opinion piece pretty much saying she lost and get over it. I agree, if you lose an election and cannot prove any foul play, you should accept the election results and shut your trap. If you believe the law favors or disfavors a particular group, advocate for better election laws. Do you agree? So she was part of pressuring companies to do what she wanted or she would brand them racist. What a delighful person. She refused to accept the results for quite a while( much like Donald). She doesn't reallly care about fair election laws. She wants to win. If you dont realize that I would like to sell you some nebraska farmground that is ocean front. You could be Geddy's neighbor. I agree that SA and Trump were completely wrong for saying their elections were stolen.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Mar 6, 2022 21:18:16 GMT -5
So she was part of pressuring companies to do what she wanted or she would brand them racist. What a delighful person. She refused to accept the results for quite a while( much like Donald). She doesn't reallly care about fair election laws. She wants to win. If you dont realize that I would like to sell you some nebraska farmground that is ocean front. You could be Geddy's neighbor. I agree that SA and Trump were completely wrong for saying their elections were stolen. but yet you don't' hold her in the same contempt? Why is that?
|
|
|
Post by longboards on Mar 6, 2022 21:44:55 GMT -5
I agree that SA and Trump were completely wrong for saying their elections were stolen. but yet you don't' hold her in the same contempt? Why is that? Why would I? Are you really comparing the post election behavior of SA and Trump as the same? My level of contempt for each is consistent with each of their behaviors following the lost election.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Mar 6, 2022 21:56:57 GMT -5
but yet you don't' hold her in the same contempt? Why is that? Why would I? Are you really comparing the post election behavior of SA and Trump as the same? My level of contempt for each is consistent with each of their behaviors following the lost election. Sure.
|
|
|
Post by longboards on Mar 7, 2022 7:43:03 GMT -5
Why would I? Are you really comparing the post election behavior of SA and Trump as the same? My level of contempt for each is consistent with each of their behaviors following the lost election. Sure. Wait… do you think the behavior of each requires the same response? Was Trumps response equal to SAs?
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Mar 7, 2022 8:04:08 GMT -5
Wait… do you think the behavior of each requires the same response? Was Trumps response equal to SAs? One question, did Democrats give him a reason to be suspicious? Hollywood, Facebook, Twitter, who did the bidding of the Democrat party before the election? Let’s add on the dirty dossier and you see the complete partnership of the media with the Democrat party. But of course to Democrats that’s perfectly acceptable. Because Influencing an election to them is justifiable when you have somebody as horrible as Donald Trump. We are so dumb we can’t possibly contemplate why anyone would be suspicious of an election given the circumstances listed above. In our opinion, every sleazeball tactic was acceptable to get rid of the orange man.
|
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Mar 7, 2022 8:07:49 GMT -5
Wait… do you think the behavior of each requires the same response? Was Trumps response equal to SAs? One question, did Democrats give him a reason to be suspicious? Hollywood, Facebook, Twitter, who did the bidding of the Democrat party before the election? Let’s add on the dirty dossier and you see the complete partnership of the media with the Democrat party. But of course to Democrats that’s perfectly acceptable. Because Influencing an election to them is justifiable when you have somebody as horrible as Donald Trump. We are so dumb we can’t possibly contemplate why anyone would be suspicious of an election given the circumstances listed above. In our opinion, every sleazeball tactic was acceptable to get rid of the orange man. Trump NEVER talked about anything you have brought up. The dossier you continue to bring up had NOTHING to do with the 2020 election. There was and is an avalanche of evidence showing the 2020 election to be free and fair. Trump incited an insurrection and is still spreading garbage about voter fraud today. Your response is EXACTLY what one would expect from a useful idiot.
|
|
|
Post by longboards on Mar 7, 2022 8:29:10 GMT -5
Wait… do you think the behavior of each requires the same response? Was Trumps response equal to SAs? One question, did Democrats give him a reason to be suspicious? Hollywood, Facebook, Twitter, who did the bidding of the Democrat party before the election? Let’s add on the dirty dossier and you see the complete partnership of the media with the Democrat party. But of course to Democrats that’s perfectly acceptable. Because Influencing an election to them is justifiable when you have somebody as horrible as Donald Trump. We are so dumb we can’t possibly contemplate why anyone would be suspicious of an election given the circumstances listed above. In our opinion, every sleazeball tactic was acceptable to get rid of the orange man. When you answer my question: do you think the behavior of each requires the same response? Was Trumps response equal to SAs? I will happily give an answer to yours.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Mar 7, 2022 8:34:33 GMT -5
One question, did Democrats give him a reason to be suspicious? Hollywood, Facebook, Twitter, who did the bidding of the Democrat party before the election? Let’s add on the dirty dossier and you see the complete partnership of the media with the Democrat party. But of course to Democrats that’s perfectly acceptable. Because Influencing an election to them is justifiable when you have somebody as horrible as Donald Trump. We are so dumb we can’t possibly contemplate why anyone would be suspicious of an election given the circumstances listed above. In our opinion, every sleazeball tactic was acceptable to get rid of the orange man. When you answer my question: do you think the behavior of each requires the same response? Was Trumps response equal to SAs? I will happily give an answer to yours. This is what I think, I think Stacy Abrams is a far more savvy politician and despite her thinking she was cheated out of the position she will lie to help her cause. President Trump is not that savvy.
|
|
|
Post by longboards on Mar 7, 2022 8:39:11 GMT -5
...and he (Trump) thinks he was cheated and will lie to help her cause?
|
|