|
Post by mikegarrison on Apr 20, 2024 4:26:56 GMT -5
The MAGA Republicans have developed a strategy to protect their power in the House of Representatives. They will take shifts monitoring the chamber floor to prevent their own party leaders from making unilateral moves that could curb their power. The new group is called the "Floor Action Response Team". The acronym writes itself. It's not like they didn't know that the acronym was FART. They deliberately chose it to be funny/insulting. Remember, these are people who are in Congress because they hate Congress. That's also why they are proud of the fact that they don't get anything done except to prevent anything from getting done.
|
|
|
Post by vergyltantor on Apr 20, 2024 4:43:06 GMT -5
The MAGA Republicans have developed a strategy to protect their power in the House of Representatives. They will take shifts monitoring the chamber floor to prevent their own party leaders from making unilateral moves that could curb their power. The new group is called the "Floor Action Response Team". The acronym writes itself. It's not like they didn't know that the acronym was FART. They deliberately chose it to be funny/insulting. Remember, these are people who are in Congress because they hate Congress. That's also why they are proud of the fact that they don't get anything done except to prevent anything from getting done. The acronym is perfect on many levels.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Apr 20, 2024 7:55:30 GMT -5
It's not like they didn't know that the acronym was FART. They deliberately chose it to be funny/insulting. Remember, these are people who are in Congress because they hate Congress. That's also why they are proud of the fact that they don't get anything done except to prevent anything from getting done. The acronym is perfect on many levels. I know lady tenderly. They’re just reprehensible aren’t they? Did you clutch your pearls when you said that? Did you smirk? Did you call the girlfriend and talk about it? Those bad Republicans. Someone give me the smelling salts. Pansy ass.
|
|
|
Post by vergyltantor on Apr 20, 2024 8:11:02 GMT -5
The acronym is perfect on many levels. I know lady tenderly. They’re just reprehensible aren’t they? Did you clutch your pearls when you said that? Did you smirk? Did you call the girlfriend and talk about it? Those bad Republicans. Someone give me the smelling salts. Pansy ass. lol
|
|
|
Post by bobinmd on Apr 20, 2024 8:18:11 GMT -5
Source? All we need is 5. We don't need all ten with Brian Kilmeade, and also when being interviewed by Sean Hannity. Also in an impromptu press conference. No, I’m not going to take the time to find every single one of those. You want to know, you do the work. Then don’t lie.
|
|
|
Post by Mocha on Apr 21, 2024 0:00:29 GMT -5
The Washington State GOP held its convention today, on Hitler’s birthday.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Apr 21, 2024 1:43:22 GMT -5
The Washington State GOP held its convention today, on Hitler’s birthday. I guess my question is why do democrats know when Adolf Hitler’s birthday is? That’s weird.
|
|
|
Post by akbar on Apr 24, 2024 12:35:49 GMT -5
156,950 Republicans voted against Donald Trump In yesterday’s GOP primary in the battleground state of Pennsylvania
Trump is in real trouble.
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanvbdad on Apr 24, 2024 12:42:36 GMT -5
No word on if those 156,950 Republicans were "never Trumpers". That's kinda important when looking at this information.
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Apr 24, 2024 12:49:31 GMT -5
No word on if those 156,950 Republicans were "never Trumpers". That's kinda important when looking at this information. you keep spinning, Murican't
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanvbdad on Apr 24, 2024 12:59:54 GMT -5
No word on if those 156,950 Republicans were "never Trumpers". That's kinda important when looking at this information. you keep spinning, Murican't Not a spin. Do you know that these voters are going to either A: vote for Biden, B: vote for Trump or C: not vote at all? It's more objective analysis than you or akbar are willing to do, but it's still a question that should be asked. imo
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Apr 24, 2024 13:05:56 GMT -5
you keep spinning, Murican't Not a spin. Do you know that these voters are going to either A: vote for Biden, B: vote for Trump or C: not vote at all? It's more objective analysis than you or akbar are willing to do, but it's still a question that should be asked. imo How are you going to go about doing this analysis?
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanvbdad on Apr 24, 2024 13:26:48 GMT -5
Not a spin. Do you know that these voters are going to either A: vote for Biden, B: vote for Trump or C: not vote at all? It's more objective analysis than you or akbar are willing to do, but it's still a question that should be asked. imo How are you going to go about doing this analysis? Don’t need to/ just did. I’m merely suggesting that people not voting for Trump in a primary doesn’t automatically mean they won’t vote or him in the general election. Are you saying that you can’t look at a result and wonder ALL of what I could POSSIBLY mean?
|
|
|
Post by franknvb on Apr 24, 2024 13:29:01 GMT -5
No word on if those 156,950 Republicans were "never Trumpers". That's kinda important when looking at this information. you keep spinning, Murican't So anyone that isn't a leftist moron like yourself, you will call names? Total loser
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Apr 24, 2024 13:29:23 GMT -5
How are you going to go about doing this analysis? Don’t need to/ just did. I’m merely suggesting that people not voting for Trump in a primary doesn’t automatically mean they won’t vote or him in the general election. Are you saying that you can’t look at a result and wonder ALL of what I could POSSIBLY mean? What do you mean, you don't need to do an analysis when you just asked about an analysis?
|
|