|
|
Post by aggielonghorn on Dec 1, 2022 0:30:15 GMT -5
Washington sweep
|
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Dec 1, 2022 4:55:11 GMT -5
Frogs and Dawgs will battle it out to see who gets to be crushed by a giant well-oiled Badger.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2022 4:58:49 GMT -5
Frogs and Dawgs will battle it out to see who gets to be crushed by a giant well-oiled Badger. I- 💀💀💀 |
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Dec 1, 2022 10:42:08 GMT -5
In past years, the teams would hold open-to-the-public practices the day before the matches. Apparently, it was mandated by the NCAA, and they no longer mandate the practices. Darn it! I had been planning on going to some again this year. It was interesting, seeing how the different teams practiced differently, what the did and didn't emphasis, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Dec 1, 2022 11:21:29 GMT -5
There are a lot of snoozers in the first round this week. But this matchup, TCU/Wash, may be the most competitive of all the 1st round matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by huskyvolley on Dec 1, 2022 11:38:59 GMT -5
There are a lot of snoozers in the first round this week. But this matchup, TCU/Wash, may be the most competitive of all the 1st round matches. I hope it is not competitive. |
|
pnwvb
Sophomore
Posts: 184 
|
Post by pnwvb on Dec 1, 2022 12:10:54 GMT -5
SAME.
|
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Dec 1, 2022 12:37:40 GMT -5
There are a lot of snoozers in the first round this week. But this matchup, TCU/Wash, may be the most competitive of all the 1st round matches. I hope it is not competitive. The RPIs for the two are #37 and #39. I think/expect competitive. |
|
|
|
Post by huskyvolley on Dec 1, 2022 13:26:48 GMT -5
I hope it is not competitive. The RPIs for the two are #37 and #39. I think/expect competitive. Massey has Washington at 18 and TCU at 49 |
|
|
|
Post by basil on Dec 1, 2022 13:50:28 GMT -5
I hope it is not competitive. The RPIs for the two are #37 and #39. I think/expect competitive. Washington's RPI is affected by all the losses due to injury, they're healthier now still I think/hope TCU can make this interesting |
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Dec 1, 2022 14:14:20 GMT -5
Frogs and Dawgs will battle it out to see who gets to be crushed by a giant well-oiled Badger. All Purple. I watched part of the TCU @ Oklahoma match on ESPN+ last night. I was especially impressed by Audrey Nalls. She's a "baller". Adams is also pretty good (but doesn't play six rotations). UW's right-side block has been pretty weak. I'm expecting a tussle. |
|
|
|
Post by basil on Dec 1, 2022 14:19:17 GMT -5
Frogs and Dawgs will battle it out to see who gets to be crushed by a giant well-oiled Badger. I watched part of the TCU @ Oklahoma match on ESPN+ last night. I was especially impressed by Audrey Nalls. She's a "baller". Adams is also pretty good. UW's right-side block has been pretty weak. I'm expecting a tussle. Nalls had 16 kills as Texas swept TCU 25-20, 15, 17 if she can limit her errors and the TCU setter can spread the ball around they're dangerous |
|
|
|
Post by westcoastbestcoast on Dec 1, 2022 14:37:23 GMT -5
There are a lot of snoozers in the first round this week. But this matchup, TCU/Wash, may be the most competitive of all the 1st round matches. Agreed - would not be shocked to see UW out first round for the first time in a longggg time. |
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Dec 1, 2022 15:04:20 GMT -5
Since people keep talking about it....
UW has never lost in the round of 64.
There have been years they were not in the tournament at all (most recently 2001). There have been years when they lost in the round of 32 when that was the first round (most recently 1989). But they have never lost in a round of 64.
Most recent:
Champions (2005)
Lost in round of 2 (never)
Lost in round of 4 (2020-2021)
Lost in round of 8 (2019)
Lost in round of 16 (2021)
Lost in round of 32 (2017)
Lost in round of 64 (never)
Not in tournament (2001)
|
|
|
|
Post by pbmu on Dec 1, 2022 19:15:34 GMT -5
Looks like Wilmes practicing now
|
|
