|
|
Post by Reach on Dec 3, 2022 23:14:09 GMT -5
I never said Lilley wasn’t good. I just told you what her future was going to be. And I was right. i would recommend not looking at her box score from today madden lol  Lilly 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Dec 3, 2022 23:18:34 GMT -5
If Kipp can play like this against Houston, the Card might have a shot.
|
|
|
|
Post by raian13 on Dec 3, 2022 23:21:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Dec 3, 2022 23:22:06 GMT -5
Another great night for Kipp. She and the middles hit in the 600s. Would have like Baird and Rubin to be at least above 250, but I guess I'll let it slide. The both started well. Baird served well, and Rubin was decent in the back row. I'll give this to Caitie, she's been looking great from the serving line. I was sitting behind the end line and her serves were moving all over the place. |
|
|
|
Post by acea on Dec 3, 2022 23:24:01 GMT -5
Podraza and Londot would like a word! Late to this but I promise you B1G fans that good volleyball occurs outside of your conference and it’s unnecessary to embarrass yourself like this one could argue that Podraza/Londot aren’t even number 2 when you have Blossom/Frohling, Stucky/Beason, Grome/Rutherford. Omg this comment got out of hand 💀. You guys I’ve been one of the biggest Kipp and Stanford fans all season. This was SARCASM |
|
|
|
Post by sunsuphornsup on Dec 4, 2022 0:31:38 GMT -5
Is Stanford offense one dimensional or is Kipp really just that good.
|
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Dec 4, 2022 0:44:42 GMT -5
Is Stanford offense one dimensional or is Kipp really just that good. This was a rare performance, usually it's more balanced. Kipp usually leads in kills but one of Rubin or Baird tends to be close, and sometimes all three have pretty good numbers. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2022 2:54:08 GMT -5
I promise you I’ve watched more of both of them than you have. Rutherford does *not* bail out Grome. Didn’t you think Lilley wasn’t that good either ? Lmao Right? Grome literally sets the table for Rutherford to do what she does. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2022 3:38:49 GMT -5
Just rewatched the match. Oglivie is so good! Very little wasted movement and she’s just so calm back there. If Stanford can stay consistent I like their chances of going far
|
|
|
|
Post by Cruz'n on Dec 4, 2022 4:30:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Sbilo on Dec 4, 2022 4:43:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Sbilo on Dec 4, 2022 4:46:16 GMT -5
Just rewatched the match. Oglivie is so good! Very little wasted movement and she’s just so calm back there. If Stanford can stay consistent I like their chances of going far Oglivie is the unsung hero for this team. She is just so fluid, not flashy, but gets the job done at a high level. Glad we still have her for 2 more years. |
|
|
|
Post by Cruz'n on Dec 4, 2022 8:41:53 GMT -5
Sort of random; but did anyone notice that LSU was running a 5-2? If this has already been commented on, my apologies.
I just can't recall the last time I saw a team running a 5-2.
|
|
|
|
Post by stanfankev on Dec 4, 2022 10:29:44 GMT -5
Is Stanford offense one dimensional or is Kipp really just that good. Kipp is clearly the star of the team (and can now hit from anywhere- so, feed the beast you know?) She often leads the team in kills (and points) but usually Baird or Rubin are fairly close to her output. Vicini is contributing more and more in the middle - even when she's not getting a lot of kills, she's at least getting more swings. Kipp gets it done. Consistently. She's that good. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2022 10:33:30 GMT -5
Stanford is so fluid as a team. Kipp is one of the most deadly + consistent arms in the country, Miner has pinpoint accurate sets, and Oglivie just seems so cool, calm, and collected in the back. Definitely playing like a #1 seed so far.
|
|
