|
|
Post by hornshouse23 on Jan 28, 2023 13:13:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by GatorsChomp on Jan 28, 2023 15:10:12 GMT -5
11. Florida - ✨Alexis Stucky lol✨ Loses Beason, but SOLID UNDERRATED pick up in ✨Anna Dixon✨. Might even be an upgrade considering she can pass when needed with experience. Floridas season will come down to passing like every other year. I just need us to be a good passing team, we have amazing middle blockers and good pin hitters... but we can't pass a freaking ball |
|
|
|
Post by GatorsChomp on Jan 28, 2023 15:13:19 GMT -5
So Auburn #1, LSU #2? Bold indeed. But I wouldn't be mad at it. That’s correct. #3 Kentucky #4 Florida #5 Arkansas. Madden moves to Serbia once and for all and denounces all of the ncaa as fraudulent. Mary Wise retires after the season. Return tomorrow when I break down the ACC! Edit: I forgot Georgia. Tied for #3 This is the best thing I've read in my entire life. Get the candles and the prayer circle ready |
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on Jan 28, 2023 20:13:23 GMT -5
no im putting faith in Bella bell. sit back and watch folks Bella Bell is a great middle and has improved greatly. I don’t think she turns Auburn into the #2 team though. I think you were missing the sarcasm of my post lol |
|
|
|
Post by hail2pitt on Jan 28, 2023 20:43:05 GMT -5
as of now id say : 1. stanford 2. wisco 3. texas 4. Minnesota 5. penn state 6. Louisville 7. Nebraska 8. Kentucky 9. Oregon 10. Pitt Im seeing 3-7 as basically a toss up tho so many question marks. Louisvilles setting and MB, Kentuckys and minnoesta passing, texas setting and no more eggleston, nebraska setting and offense. I threw oregon and Pitt in because I had no clue who else to put. pitt doesnt have many proven players as of now right? Pitt returns 2 All Americans |
|
|
|
Post by donut on Jan 28, 2023 21:13:56 GMT -5
Bella Bell is a great middle and has improved greatly. I don’t think she turns Auburn into the #2 team though. I think you were missing the sarcasm of my post lol Kind of a rude thing to be sarcastic about lol |
|
|
|
Post by widdledumpling on Jan 28, 2023 21:21:52 GMT -5
11. Florida - ✨Alexis Stucky lol✨ Loses Beason, but SOLID UNDERRATED pick up in ✨Anna Dixon✨. Might even be an upgrade considering she can pass when needed with experience. Floridas season will come down to passing like every other year. I just need us to be a good passing team, we have amazing middle blockers and good pin hitters... but we can't pass a freaking ball ah, the Texas motto lo these many years |
|
|
|
Post by GatorsChomp on Jan 29, 2023 11:22:32 GMT -5
omg I forgot to rank
1. Stanford
2. Wisconsin
3. Texas
4. Nebraska
(I know, same old boring top 4)
5. Kentucky ----> return most of the same team + 6'5 OH, this team is dangerous + needs to be in conversation for a Natty next season
6-10: Pitt, Minnesota, Penn State, Florida, Oregon (in what ever order tbh)
HM: Louisville ---> not set on them yet due to setting changes but we never know
I think next season will be v dramatic... most of the seniors from the covid season are leaving and leaves up and rising seniors play a 5th year
|
|
|
|
Post by hookemboo on Jan 30, 2023 1:47:36 GMT -5
Louisville’s setting situation seems very suspect to me to put them in the top 10. I still feel like DBK needs to go after another setter & think about running a 6-2 for safety. 😗 |
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on Jan 30, 2023 11:15:32 GMT -5
omg I forgot to rank 1. Stanford 2. Wisconsin 3. Texas 4. Nebraska (I know, same old boring top 4) 5. Kentucky ----> return most of the same team + 6'5 OH, this team is dangerous + needs to be in conversation for a Natty next season 6-10: Pitt, Minnesota, Penn State, Florida, Oregon (in what ever order tbh) HM: Louisville ---> not set on them yet due to setting changes but we never know I think next season will be v dramatic... most of the seniors from the covid season are leaving and leaves up and rising seniors play a 5th year Louisville an honorable mention for setting changes (glock was a top 5 setter in her class) but Nebraska actually jumps up to number 4 after losing their best setter, best blocker, 2 of their 3 best passers and 3 of their 4 best defenders. 3 of their best serves as well. I just dont understand the logic ig, nebraska has 0 proven passers aside from Rodriguez and 0 proven setters on roster. they have 1 pin who has shown she can consistently terminate for an entire season. not saying Louisville should be higher (although I do think Florida is a very interesting choice over them) but if setting changes os the reason they are there how tf is nebraska at 4 lol they have a lot of top recruits on their roster... but they did last year too. I think putting them at 4 may be more about the name on their back bc they look like a huge question mark right now imo |
|
|
|
Post by jwvolley on Jan 30, 2023 11:27:19 GMT -5
omg I forgot to rank 1. Stanford 2. Wisconsin 3. Texas 4. Nebraska (I know, same old boring top 4) 5. Kentucky ----> return most of the same team + 6'5 OH, this team is dangerous + needs to be in conversation for a Natty next season 6-10: Pitt, Minnesota, Penn State, Florida, Oregon (in what ever order tbh) HM: Louisville ---> not set on them yet due to setting changes but we never know I think next season will be v dramatic... most of the seniors from the covid season are leaving and leaves up and rising seniors play a 5th year Louisville an honorable mention for setting changes (glock was a top 5 setter in her class) but Nebraska actually jumps up to number 4 after losing their best setter, best blocker, 2 of their 3 best passers and 3 of their 4 best defenders. 3 of their best serves as well. I just dont understand the logic ig, nebraska has 0 proven passers aside from Rodriguez and 0 proven setters on roster. they have 1 pin who has shown she can consistently terminate for an entire season. not saying Louisville should be higher (although I do think Florida is a very interesting choice over them) but if setting changes os the reason they are there how tf is nebraska at 4 lol they have a lot of top recruits on their roster... but they did last year too. I think putting them at 4 may be more about the name on their back bc they look like a huge question mark right now imo You literally placed them in the 3-7 range in your own top that you said was a tossup lol but then take issue with someone putting them within that same range? |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Jan 30, 2023 11:38:23 GMT -5
It's simple. Nebraska is in the B1G, and Louisville is in the ACC. Does that clear it up?
|
|
|
|
Post by bballnut90 on Jan 30, 2023 11:46:39 GMT -5
omg I forgot to rank 1. Stanford 2. Wisconsin 3. Texas 4. Nebraska (I know, same old boring top 4) 5. Kentucky ----> return most of the same team + 6'5 OH, this team is dangerous + needs to be in conversation for a Natty next season 6-10: Pitt, Minnesota, Penn State, Florida, Oregon (in what ever order tbh) HM: Louisville ---> not set on them yet due to setting changes but we never know I think next season will be v dramatic... most of the seniors from the covid season are leaving and leaves up and rising seniors play a 5th year Louisville an honorable mention for setting changes (glock was a top 5 setter in her class) but Nebraska actually jumps up to number 4 after losing their best setter, best blocker, 2 of their 3 best passers and 3 of their 4 best defenders. 3 of their best serves as well. I just dont understand the logic ig, nebraska has 0 proven passers aside from Rodriguez and 0 proven setters on roster. they have 1 pin who has shown she can consistently terminate for an entire season. not saying Louisville should be higher (although I do think Florida is a very interesting choice over them) but if setting changes os the reason they are there how tf is nebraska at 4 lol they have a lot of top recruits on their roster... but they did last year too. I think putting them at 4 may be more about the name on their back bc they look like a huge question mark right now imo To be fair everyone but Wisconsin and Stanford have big question marks right now. On paper Nebraska is loaded. They have the top setting recruit, top overall recruit on the left, plus the top libero recruit to help with passing. Generally speaking Nebraska had a ton of size and talent to work with. And the setting situation should improve as long as Reilly is healthy. They won’t be without flaw, but I think they deserve to be top 4 preseason based on sheer talent and coaching ability. Louisville is underrated at 11, but a lot of the team’s success is riding on a 3rd year setter who hasn’t seen the court her first 2 years and was the #39 recruit a couple of years ago. They also don’t have offensive production in the middle returning. They don’t appear to have the depth to make changes if Glock isn’t up to par or if they can’t get production out of their middles. I’d rank them a lot higher but I think they have a smaller window for error so I can see why others don’t rank them as high. |
|
|
|
Post by madden55 on Jan 30, 2023 11:53:54 GMT -5
If pitt gets the uci middle the should be top 5 if we are giving Nebraskas recruits the benefit of the doubt too. Stafford and Babcock are amazing talents and they still have Second team AA Gomez and hopefully a healthy Juliana Dalton if either of those 2 don’t pan out. Also I don’t wanna sleep on Blaire bayless who could be very solid. They also shored up some of their back court holes with the vt transfer
|
|
|
|
Post by hookemboo on Jan 30, 2023 12:08:18 GMT -5
It's simple. Nebraska is in the B1G, and Louisville is in the ACC. Does that clear it up? Yeah, this added nothing to the argument, but thanks on giving us a little conference education |
|
