|
Post by vbdiva on Sept 6, 2024 21:20:52 GMT -5
Watching the Minny - vs- Baylor match... wow, ACEVEDO..... If we landed her!! We're sitting at #1 and 4-0 right now. Even with the mediocre play of the Badgers, she would have made us 4-0.
That's how bad we need an above-average, game-ready pin hitter.
It's a shame she didn't click with the Wisconsin team.
|
|
|
Post by vbdiva on Sept 6, 2024 21:35:45 GMT -5
Uhhhh, multiple posters wanted her benched because she was a blocking liability apparently. Multiple people upvoted diva posts degrading Anna Smrek, and now suddenly it's only diva? Exactly - and they won this match because of Smrek and the IMMEDIATE change she had on block touches, blocks, and change in offence TCU has to make with her on the RS - the haters just hate because they are not her and idk what are jealous?? Like be for real for real 😂. She was also taking her best swings and connecting with Charlie tonight which is a good sign. Smrek also had more blocks in a span of 5 minutes than Booth did all night unfortunately. Feel bad for Booth - you never know what’s going on in a players mind or on and off the court lives, I’m sure she will pick her her level. Let’s not tear each other down and ENOUGH of the vendetta against Smrek - VDIVA im lookin at you. Let’s support all our Badgers. Ya'll acting like I'm slamming her as the worse human ever or I'm calling her out of her name. Of course I want her to succeed! Her success means a key to a B1G/NCAA championship. I been giving my OPINION on her play and OPINION how she was not being utulized to her best potential (in the middle). She's a blocking liability, I stand by that, and I take D. Robinson over her any day. PERIODTTTTTTT! She played great today -- a little benching may have done the job for competetive juices. I stand with what I said, she hurts us on the RS, more than any other player on the current roster - of course she'll have a good game here and there, against unranked opponents perhaps? Llet's see her play tomorrow. PROVE ME WRONG ANNA -- I HOPE YOU DO, BOO!
|
|
|
Post by vbdiva on Sept 6, 2024 21:37:30 GMT -5
The way half of the posters here wanted to bench Anna freaking Smrek, our 2nd best player, because of a couple of bad games while injured and having extremely limited practice with a brand new setter lmao. Outside of diva I'd be hard pressed to name 3 posters that wanted Smrek benched for any reasons outside of actually getting her healthy. SHE WAS NOT INJURED! That was a nice storyline -- But maybe her ego was a bit bruised? She lit it up today. I'm still not convinced. But go Anna, gooooooooo
|
|
|
Post by vbdiva on Sept 6, 2024 21:39:35 GMT -5
Name half or I will block you. Silence and upvoting when Vbdiva posted is agreeing with her. There are at least 4-5 posters who regularly posts here (vbeez, maigrey) who've upvoted her comments the past few days. And she literally tears into Smrek ANY time she posts the past few days lmao, it ain't just a bench. Girl was out here saying Smrek "scores when it doesn't matter", or Smrek ruining the chemistry, and y'all were all silenced or upvoting her. We have posters like honeybadger88 or Burly Ives (both regulars) out here saying Smrek is a ....liability blocking...and silence. How many posts here regularly? 10? So that's 5. You want the game threads too? Because there's even more there LOL Girl bye.... You reaching too deep for no reason -- trust me, it's not that intense.
|
|
|
Post by vbdiva on Sept 6, 2024 21:42:51 GMT -5
Outside of diva I'd be hard pressed to name 3 posters that wanted Smrek benched for any reasons outside of actually getting her healthy. Uhhhh, multiple posters wanted her benched because she was a blocking liability apparently. Multiple people upvoted diva posts degrading Anna Smrek, and now suddenly it's only diva? And she is! And we did better without her -- on the Offensive and Blocking side. I do think Carter is on the hot seat, and I'll take Anna and CC in the middle at this point. BOOTH, has been boooooooo, and she is a non-mf FACTOR ALL SEASON. Calling you out Miss Carter -- sets aren't that bad now - I hope you connect with Charlie boo.
|
|
|
Post by badgerbadgerbadger on Sept 6, 2024 21:57:18 GMT -5
Exactly - and they won this match because of Smrek and the IMMEDIATE change she had on block touches, blocks, and change in offence TCU has to make with her on the RS - the haters just hate because they are not her and idk what are jealous?? Like be for real for real 😂. She was also taking her best swings and connecting with Charlie tonight which is a good sign. Smrek also had more blocks in a span of 5 minutes than Booth did all night unfortunately. Feel bad for Booth - you never know what’s going on in a players mind or on and off the court lives, I’m sure she will pick her her level. Let’s not tear each other down and ENOUGH of the vendetta against Smrek - VDIVA im lookin at you. Let’s support all our Badgers. Ya'll acting like I'm slamming her as the worse human ever or I'm calling her out of her name. Of course I want her to succeed! Her success means a key to a B1G/NCAA championship. I been giving my OPINION on her play and OPINION how she was not being utulized to her best potential (in the middle). She's a blocking liability, I stand by that, and I take D. Robinson over her any day. PERIODTTTTTTT! She played great today -- a little benching may have done the job for competetive juices. I stand with what I said, she hurts us on the RS, more than any other player on the current roster - of course she'll have a good game here and there, against unranked opponents perhaps? Llet's see her play tomorrow. PROVE ME WRONG ANNA -- I HOPE YOU DO, BOO!she's a blocking liability....so....you want to put her...in the middle...whose biggest job is to...block. Ok, great logic. She's statistically the best blocker on Wisconsin. Hitting % of left-sides against Smrek this season: Anna Debeer: 10-11-39: -.026 Madisen Skinner: 15-4-51: .216 Hitting % of left-sides against Robinson and no Smrek: Elia Rubin: 20-5-43: .349 Today: Parra in the first 3 sets with Robinson as RS: 15 kills on .300+ hitting. With Anna in the last 2 sets: 6 kills and end up with a final % of .279 for the whole match. Tell me how our block did better without her again? ALL stats are against this, so wtf are you using? Bias and hate against Anna Smrek? Also, you've been intentionally misspelling her name as "Shrek" for years. We all know damn well you do it on purpose at this point, and not as some sort of compliment either so don't try to spin it that way because you only ever are calling her "Shrek" when you're trying to advocate to bench her or talking about how "useless" she is. But yea, that's not calling out her name and making an ad hominem attack instead of sticking to the game.
|
|
|
Post by maigrey on Sept 6, 2024 22:02:54 GMT -5
Watching the Minny - vs- Baylor match... wow, ACEVEDO..... If we landed her!! We're sitting at #1 and 4-0 right now. Even with the mediocre play of the Badgers, she would have made us 4-0. That's how bad we need an above-average, game-ready pin hitter. It's a shame she didn't click with the Wisconsin team. She was always going to stay with Keegan. :/
|
|
|
Post by badgervb982597 on Sept 6, 2024 22:18:30 GMT -5
Ya'll acting like I'm slamming her as the worse human ever or I'm calling her out of her name. Of course I want her to succeed! Her success means a key to a B1G/NCAA championship. I been giving my OPINION on her play and OPINION how she was not being utulized to her best potential (in the middle). She's a blocking liability, I stand by that, and I take D. Robinson over her any day. PERIODTTTTTTT! She played great today -- a little benching may have done the job for competetive juices. I stand with what I said, she hurts us on the RS, more than any other player on the current roster - of course she'll have a good game here and there, against unranked opponents perhaps? Llet's see her play tomorrow. PROVE ME WRONG ANNA -- I HOPE YOU DO, BOO!she's a blocking liability....so....you want to put her...in the middle...whose biggest job is to...block. Ok, great logic. She's statistically the best blocker on Wisconsin. Hitting % of left-sides against Smrek this season: Anna Debeer: 10-11-39: -.026 Madisen Skinner: 15-4-51: .216 Hitting % of left-sides against Robinson and no Smrek: Elia Rubin: 20-5-43: .349 Today: Parra in the first 3 sets with Robinson as RS: 15 kills on .300+ hitting. With Anna in the last 2 sets: 6 kills and end up with a final % of .279 for the whole match. Tell me how our block did better without her again? ALL stats are against this, so wtf are you using? Bias and hate against Anna Smrek? Also, you've been intentionally misspelling her name as "Shrek" for years. We all know damn well you do it on purpose at this point, and not as some sort of compliment either so don't try to spin it that way because you only ever are calling her "Shrek" when you're trying to advocate to bench her or talking about how "useless" she is. But yea, that's not calling out her name and making an ad hominem attack instead of sticking to the game. Thank you badgerbadgerbadger for using statistical evidence and not just hateful opinions. Smrek is by far a better blocker on the RS than anyone in the NCAA, look at volley metrics and positive touches and full on blocks, it’s no secret like what are you saying. How can she possibly be better blocking in the middle having to MOVE side to side every time as opposed the right and simply staying there. Keep having your opinions in which you clearly don’t know much about volleyball . You’re clearly pressed, go talk about another team other than ours if you have nothing nice to say, don’t say anything at all. See you all badgers tomorrow ❤️🤞
|
|
|
Post by 25or624 on Sept 6, 2024 22:23:53 GMT -5
Watching the Minny - vs- Baylor match... wow, ACEVEDO..... If we landed her!! We're sitting at #1 and 4-0 right now. Even with the mediocre play of the Badgers, she would have made us 4-0. That's how bad we need an above-average, game-ready pin hitter. It's a shame she didn't click with the Wisconsin team. She actually said she had a "great time with the girls", but she felt that Cook's coaching philosophy, as outlined in a letter he sent to her before she took a visit, was exactly what she was looking for.
"From the facts arise the issues. Without the facts, there are no issues".
|
|
|
Post by vbdiva on Sept 6, 2024 22:43:42 GMT -5
Ya'll acting like I'm slamming her as the worse human ever or I'm calling her out of her name. Of course I want her to succeed! Her success means a key to a B1G/NCAA championship. I been giving my OPINION on her play and OPINION how she was not being utulized to her best potential (in the middle). She's a blocking liability, I stand by that, and I take D. Robinson over her any day. PERIODTTTTTTT! She played great today -- a little benching may have done the job for competetive juices. I stand with what I said, she hurts us on the RS, more than any other player on the current roster - of course she'll have a good game here and there, against unranked opponents perhaps? Llet's see her play tomorrow. PROVE ME WRONG ANNA -- I HOPE YOU DO, BOO!she's a blocking liability....so....you want to put her...in the middle...whose biggest job is to...block. Ok, great logic. She's statistically the best blocker on Wisconsin. Hitting % of left-sides against Smrek this season: Anna Debeer: 10-11-39: -.026 Madisen Skinner: 15-4-51: .216 Hitting % of left-sides against Robinson and no Smrek: Elia Rubin: 20-5-43: .349 Today: Parra in the first 3 sets with Robinson as RS: 15 kills on .300+ hitting. With Anna in the last 2 sets: 6 kills and end up with a final % of .279 for the whole match. Tell me how our block did better without her again? ALL stats are against this, so wtf are you using? Bias and hate against Anna Smrek? Also, you've been intentionally misspelling her name as "Shrek" for years. We all know damn well you do it on purpose at this point, and not as some sort of compliment either so don't try to spin it that way because you only ever are calling her "Shrek" when you're trying to advocate to bench her or talking about how "useless" she is. But yea, that's not calling out her name and making an ad hominem attack instead of sticking to the game. Simma down Papa Smrek.... convince yourself not me, or datavolley...
|
|
|
Post by vbdiva on Sept 6, 2024 22:45:01 GMT -5
she's a blocking liability....so....you want to put her...in the middle...whose biggest job is to...block. Ok, great logic. She's statistically the best blocker on Wisconsin. Hitting % of left-sides against Smrek this season: Anna Debeer: 10-11-39: -.026 Madisen Skinner: 15-4-51: .216 Hitting % of left-sides against Robinson and no Smrek: Elia Rubin: 20-5-43: .349 Today: Parra in the first 3 sets with Robinson as RS: 15 kills on .300+ hitting. With Anna in the last 2 sets: 6 kills and end up with a final % of .279 for the whole match. Tell me how our block did better without her again? ALL stats are against this, so wtf are you using? Bias and hate against Anna Smrek? Also, you've been intentionally misspelling her name as "Shrek" for years. We all know damn well you do it on purpose at this point, and not as some sort of compliment either so don't try to spin it that way because you only ever are calling her "Shrek" when you're trying to advocate to bench her or talking about how "useless" she is. But yea, that's not calling out her name and making an ad hominem attack instead of sticking to the game. Thank you badgerbadgerbadger for using statistical evidence and not just hateful opinions. Smrek is by far a better blocker on the RS than anyone in the NCAA, look at volley metrics and positive touches and full on blocks, it’s no secret like what are you saying. How can she possibly be better blocking in the middle having to MOVE side to side every time as opposed the right and simply staying there. Keep having your opinions in which you clearly don’t know much about volleyball . You’re clearly pressed, go talk about another team other than ours if you have nothing nice to say, don’t say anything at all. See you all badgers tomorrow ❤️🤞 Not pressed at all... I'm blessed. You ok?
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Sept 6, 2024 23:37:41 GMT -5
TCU match
Points scored during the serve of server:
Charlie: 8 points scored, 14 times serve lost Orzol: 6 points scored, 10 times serve lost GG: 8 points scored, 10 times serve lost Franklin: 5 points scored, 14 times serve lost Devyn: 8 points scored, 6 times serve lost CC: 2 points scored, 3 times serve lost Schumacher: 0 points scored, 5 times serve lost Smrek: 1 point scored, 1 time serve lost Chan: 4 points scored, 3 times serve lost Carly: 1 points scored, 2 times serve lost
-----------
Sideout percents by server for the year (lower number the better)
Charlie: 0.632 Orzol: 0.571 GG: 0.567 Smrek: 0.750 Franklin: 0.700 Devyn: 0.644 Schumacher: 0.889 CC: 0.727 Chan: 0.429 Carly: 0.667
|
|
|
Post by badgerbadgerbadger on Sept 6, 2024 23:42:46 GMT -5
TCU match Points scored during the serve of server: Charlie: 8 points scored, 14 times serve lost Orzol: 6 points scored, 10 times serve lost GG: 8 points scored, 10 times serve lost Franklin: 5 points scored, 14 times serve lost Devyn: 8 points scored, 6 times serve lost CC: 2 points scored, 3 times serve lost Schumacher: 0 points scored, 5 times serve lost Smrek: 1 point scored, 1 time serve lost Chan: 4 points scored, 3 times serve lost Carly: 1 points scored, 2 times serve lost ----------- Sideout percents by server for the year (lower number the better) Charlie: 0.632 Orzol: 0.571 GG: 0.567 Smrek: 0.750 Franklin: 0.700 Devyn: 0.644 Schumacher: 0.889 CC: 0.727 Chan: 0.429 Carly: 0.667 How many servers last year did we have who had below .600 sideout for the other team? And do you remember what was Franklin's sideout % last year? Because looking at this we have two good servers, then Charlie has potential if she can gets the errors down, same with Devyn, but then I'm not seeing two more good servers which would be big problem considering how much emphasis Sheff placed on serving this year. Also thanks for the meticulous work keeping this updated.
|
|
|
Post by bucky415 on Sept 6, 2024 23:45:43 GMT -5
TCU match Points scored during the serve of server: Charlie: 8 points scored, 14 times serve lost Orzol: 6 points scored, 10 times serve lost GG: 8 points scored, 10 times serve lost Franklin: 5 points scored, 14 times serve lost Devyn: 8 points scored, 6 times serve lost CC: 2 points scored, 3 times serve lost Schumacher: 0 points scored, 5 times serve lost Smrek: 1 point scored, 1 time serve lost Chan: 4 points scored, 3 times serve lost Carly: 1 points scored, 2 times serve lost ----------- Sideout percents by server for the year (lower number the better) Charlie: 0.632 Orzol: 0.571 GG: 0.567 Smrek: 0.750 Franklin: 0.700 Devyn: 0.644 Schumacher: 0.889 CC: 0.727 Chan: 0.429 Carly: 0.667 And I guess Charlie came up big in the 5th, so a good time to reverse her overall trend!
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Sept 6, 2024 23:48:29 GMT -5
TCU match Points scored during the serve of server: Charlie: 8 points scored, 14 times serve lost Orzol: 6 points scored, 10 times serve lost GG: 8 points scored, 10 times serve lost Franklin: 5 points scored, 14 times serve lost Devyn: 8 points scored, 6 times serve lost CC: 2 points scored, 3 times serve lost Schumacher: 0 points scored, 5 times serve lost Smrek: 1 point scored, 1 time serve lost Chan: 4 points scored, 3 times serve lost Carly: 1 points scored, 2 times serve lost ----------- Sideout percents by server for the year (lower number the better) Charlie: 0.632 Orzol: 0.571 GG: 0.567 Smrek: 0.750 Franklin: 0.700 Devyn: 0.644 Schumacher: 0.889 CC: 0.727 Chan: 0.429 Carly: 0.667 How many servers last year did we have who had below .600 sideout for the other team? And do you remember what was Franklin's sideout % last year? Because looking at this we have two good servers, then Charlie has potential if she can gets the errors down, same with Devyn, but then I'm not seeing two more good servers which would be big problem considering how much emphasis Sheff placed on serving this year. Also thanks for the meticulous work keeping this updated. Sideout percents by server for the year 2023 (lower number the better) Izzy: 0.545 Orzol: 0.515 GG: 0.458 MJ: 0.493 Franklin: 0.566 CC: 0.560 Boyer: 0.468 TTA: 0.570 (I deleted everyone with fewer than 50 attempts.)
|
|