|
|
Post by Wichsen on Jan 16, 2024 23:58:13 GMT -5
Do we want to see Plummer in Paris...or not? WE want the healthiest and best performing OHs in Paris. If Plummer fits the bill, then take her. this criteria has exemption right? - Larson 😅 |
|
|
|
Post by socalplayer on Jan 17, 2024 4:09:57 GMT -5
Good, for the most part. when she plays with Khalia, she's not getting covered by Moki. She passed 2.20 and I think Moki only took one/two balls from her Do we want to see Plummer in Paris...or not? Yes! 100%. Leave Larson at home. |
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Jan 17, 2024 4:33:33 GMT -5
Do we want to see Plummer in Paris...or not? Yes! 100%. Leave Larson at home. These are not mutually exclusive. |
|
|
|
Post by udubhuskiefan on Jan 17, 2024 9:22:39 GMT -5
Yes! 100%. Leave Larson at home. These are not mutually exclusive. Isn’t it most likely going to be Larson, cook, Plummer, and Frantti? |
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Jan 17, 2024 9:31:19 GMT -5
These are not mutually exclusive. Isn’t it most likely going to be Larson, cook, Plummer, and Frantti? That is what a lot of people think. There are obviously a lot of different considerations, like whether to take both Larson and Cook, but I think a strict choice between Larson or Plummer isn’t necessarily the way it has to play out. |
|
|
|
Post by udubhuskiefan on Jan 17, 2024 9:32:20 GMT -5
Isn’t it most likely going to be Larson, cook, Plummer, and Frantti? That is what a lot of people think. There are obviously a lot of different considerations, like whether to take both Larson and Cook, but I think a strict choice between Larson or Plummer isn’t necessarily the way it has to play out. As much as I’d like to see Skinner over Frantti, it’s not gonna happen. Avery is killing it in Italy. |
|
|
|
Post by Reach on Jan 17, 2024 9:55:33 GMT -5
These are not mutually exclusive. Isn’t it most likely going to be Larson, cook, Plummer, and Frantti? IMO, yes |
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Jan 17, 2024 12:28:15 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2024 12:30:53 GMT -5
Why would they want to take Frantti….
|
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Jan 17, 2024 12:41:24 GMT -5
Why would they want to take Frantti…. because they dont run cansu's high ball offense. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2024 12:42:00 GMT -5
Why would they want to take Frantti…. because they dont run cansu's high ball offense. you wouldn’t rather take skinner ? |
|
|
|
Post by dokterrudi on Jan 17, 2024 12:42:21 GMT -5
Need to take Plummer.
|
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Jan 17, 2024 12:43:10 GMT -5
because they dont run cansu's high ball offense. you wouldn’t rather take skinner ? maybe. but Frantti is more experienced... and its also karch. |
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on Jan 17, 2024 12:47:56 GMT -5
Kelsey seems like the only lock for outside. I guess Karch could see Larson in that way too. But I think Skinner has a case, obviously still lots of vb to be played. I do wonder how Karch will treat VNL and if he will have made most of his decisions by then in his mind lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Reach on Jan 17, 2024 13:19:44 GMT -5
Agree with Kelsey being the only lock.
Plummer seems to have gone up while Frantti has cooled off a bit. Larson retiring would have made this easy for Skinner.
And then there is Lanier…. Is she completely out of consideration?
lol SWP
|
|
