|
Post by VolleyBurg96 on Jul 1, 2024 18:25:56 GMT -5
Final Stats Attack (errors do not include blocked afaik) Franklin: 33-6-61, 4 blocks, 2 aces, 16 digs Beason: 32-12-62, 1 block, 1 ace, 9 digs Hudson: 24-9-57, 2 aces, 23 digs Mruzik: 23-11-67, 1 block, 3 aces, 10 digs Fischer: 22-2-40, 11 blocks, 3 aces, 6 digs Babcock: 17-9-47, 6 blocks, 2 aces, 9 digs Louis: 15-7-31, 7 blocks, 3 digs Booth: 10-1-17, 4 bloks, 1 ace, 3 digs Miner: 9-0-12, 2 blocks, 2 aces, 9 digs Landfair: 6-5-19, 1 block, 1 ace, 6 digs Lexi: 46 digs Really impressive stat line for Beason who did not play that many sets… or maybe I’m tripping?
|
|
|
Post by midnightblue on Jul 1, 2024 18:42:25 GMT -5
Final Stats Attack (errors do not include blocked afaik) Franklin: 33-6-61, 4 blocks, 2 aces, 16 digs Beason: 32-12-62, 1 block, 1 ace, 9 digs Hudson: 24-9-57, 2 aces, 23 digs Mruzik: 23-11-67, 1 block, 3 aces, 10 digs Fischer: 22-2-40, 11 blocks, 3 aces, 6 digs Babcock: 17-9-47, 6 blocks, 2 aces, 9 digs Louis: 15-7-31, 7 blocks, 3 digs Booth: 10-1-17, 4 bloks, 1 ace, 3 digs Miner: 9-0-12, 2 blocks, 2 aces, 9 digs Landfair: 6-5-19, 1 block, 1 ace, 6 digs Lexi: 46 digs Really impressive stat line for Beason who did not play that many sets… or maybe I’m tripping? definitely for a first NT look. she won the starting spot when it mattered most.
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Jul 1, 2024 19:29:20 GMT -5
Final Stats Attack (errors do not include blocked afaik) Franklin: 33-6-61, 4 blocks, 2 aces, 16 digs Beason: 32-12-62, 1 block, 1 ace, 9 digs Hudson: 24-9-57, 2 aces, 23 digs Mruzik: 23-11-67, 1 block, 3 aces, 10 digs Fischer: 22-2-40, 11 blocks, 3 aces, 6 digs Babcock: 17-9-47, 6 blocks, 2 aces, 9 digs Louis: 15-7-31, 7 blocks, 3 digs Booth: 10-1-17, 4 bloks, 1 ace, 3 digs Miner: 9-0-12, 2 blocks, 2 aces, 9 digs Landfair: 6-5-19, 1 block, 1 ace, 6 digs Lexi: 46 digs Really impressive stat line for Beason who did not play that many sets… or maybe I’m tripping? Yea, she pretty much only had the last two sets vs PR and the five vs DOM. Im curious if a review system would overturn any of her errors (i went through the play by play and the errors listed does include being blocked)
|
|
|
Post by jwvolley on Jul 1, 2024 19:32:31 GMT -5
Really impressive stat line for Beason who did not play that many sets… or maybe I’m tripping? Yea, she pretty much only had the last two sets vs PR and the five vs DOM. Im curious if a review system would overturn any of her errors (i went through the play by play and the errors listed does include being blocked) There was absolutely one that I am like 90% sure hit the line. Probably a touch somewhere in the mix too.
|
|
|
Post by hopefuldawg on Jul 1, 2024 21:11:46 GMT -5
Final Stats Attack (errors do not include blocked afaik) Franklin: 33-6-61, 4 blocks, 2 aces, 16 digs Beason: 32-12-62, 1 block, 1 ace, 9 digs Hudson: 24-9-57, 2 aces, 23 digs Mruzik: 23-11-67, 1 block, 3 aces, 10 digs Fischer: 22-2-40, 11 blocks, 3 aces, 6 digs Babcock: 17-9-47, 6 blocks, 2 aces, 9 digs Louis: 15-7-31, 7 blocks, 3 digs Booth: 10-1-17, 4 bloks, 1 ace, 3 digs Miner: 9-0-12, 2 blocks, 2 aces, 9 digs Landfair: 6-5-19, 1 block, 1 ace, 6 digs Lexi: 46 digs This is a very good statline against an Olympic-qualified team. Franklin especially is impressive. How did we hold up in passing? I know the NORCECA stats are suspect, but they graded USA’s passing favorably. The crunched numbers are on my work computer, but I recall the passing efficiency was something like high .500s and % excellent was like low 60s (they were close because total errors was low). Something that stood out was the team’s passing grades for the tournament as a whole and for the final were nearly identical.
|
|
|
Post by hopefuldawg on Jul 1, 2024 21:17:55 GMT -5
This is a very good statline against an Olympic-qualified team. Franklin especially is impressive. How did we hold up in passing? I know the NORCECA stats are suspect, but they graded USA’s passing favorably. The crunched numbers are on my work computer, but I recall the passing efficiency was something like high .500s and % excellent was like low 60s (they were close because total errors was low). Something that stood out was the team’s passing grades for the tournament as a whole and for the final were nearly identical. Also, Hudson’s defensive stats for the final were wild. She kept the ball alive 21 times?
|
|
|
Post by caribe1 on Jul 1, 2024 22:05:40 GMT -5
Okay but the crowd has got to hate these horns too right? It was absolutely awful. My head was already pounding before the national anthems were even played, and I couldn’t hear my friend sitting right next to me.
|
|
|
Post by liberovb10 on Jul 2, 2024 17:16:49 GMT -5
Yall really gonna write off Babcock for not being great in her first international tournament lol. She’s going to be a sophomore in college… this does not mean she can’t be good ever outside of college Jesus Christ lol exactly. she's maybe 19/20 years old? This was the first time on the big stage so let's give her some credit. what about the 14 year-old on the Puerto Rico team giving the DOM fits? (just playing devil’s advocate because i do think Babcock has the intangibles to be a great USA OPP)
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Jul 2, 2024 17:26:19 GMT -5
Yall really gonna write off Babcock for not being great in her first international tournament lol. She’s going to be a sophomore in college… this does not mean she can’t be good ever outside of college Jesus Christ lol Did I miss something in this thread? Who is writing off Babcock to such a degree?
|
|
|
Post by bigredhimbo on Jul 2, 2024 21:23:02 GMT -5
Yall really gonna write off Babcock for not being great in her first international tournament lol. She’s going to be a sophomore in college… this does not mean she can’t be good ever outside of college Jesus Christ lol Did I miss something in this thread? Who is writing off Babcock to such a degree? lol if you figure that out please lmk
|
|
|
Post by hopefuldawg on Jul 3, 2024 9:04:48 GMT -5
Did I miss something in this thread? Who is writing off Babcock to such a degree? lol if you figure that out please lmk Some observations for USA roster: Booth - she made lots of block and block touches that can be converted into plays. Her attack though needs to improve. Franklin - she's the gold spot for this team. Reception should improve though if she wants to play in a high level pro team or US NT. Fischer - very good attacking MB. Blocking must improve. Lexi - she can actually play in US NT given more experience in international volleyball. Hudson - Good all around but needs power. Miner - very steady setter. Her connection with attackers is pretty good given a short period of practice. NT material. Beason - US NT material opp but she needs more power or else she'll end up like Murphy. Babcock - What a let down. I was hoping that she could be that US opp that will be reliable in scoring. Martin should've been in this tournament.Mruzik - Her performance was up and down. Needs consistency in both offense and defense.
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Jul 3, 2024 9:11:03 GMT -5
lol if you figure that out please lmk Some observations for USA roster: Booth - she made lots of block and block touches that can be converted into plays. Her attack though needs to improve. Franklin - she's the gold spot for this team. Reception should improve though if she wants to play in a high level pro team or US NT. Fischer - very good attacking MB. Blocking must improve. Lexi - she can actually play in US NT given more experience in international volleyball. Hudson - Good all around but needs power. Miner - very steady setter. Her connection with attackers is pretty good given a short period of practice. NT material. Beason - US NT material opp but she needs more power or else she'll end up like Murphy. Babcock - What a let down. I was hoping that she could be that US opp that will be reliable in scoring. Martin should've been in this tournament.Mruzik - Her performance was up and down. Needs consistency in both offense and defense. Well, that poster was disappointed in babcocks performance this tournament… so what? That’s hardly an indefensible take, considering she hit .170. I don’t read that as saying that Babcock can’t ever be a good opposite outside of college, but whatevs.
|
|
|
Post by bigredhimbo on Jul 3, 2024 13:27:06 GMT -5
Well, that poster was disappointed in babcocks performance this tournament… so what? That’s hardly an indefensible take, considering she hit .170. I don’t read that as saying that Babcock can’t ever be a good opposite outside of college, but whatevs. maybe "US opposite" was interpreted as her indefinite role at that position beyond. bottom line ppl are too critical sometimes and overly defensive sometimes... just the way it is and just the way ppl are lol
|
|
|
Post by rjaege on Jul 3, 2024 14:57:17 GMT -5
The US team needs more time together to gel IMO. Get to know each other playing tendencies, weaknesses and strengths. The players had like 2 weeks to practice together. They are playing against well established teams. Franklin was their dominant hitter. If she cannot return, it will be tough.
|
|
|
Post by maigrey on Jul 3, 2024 22:56:46 GMT -5
The US team needs more time together to gel IMO. Get to know each other playing tendencies, weaknesses and strengths. The players had like 2 weeks to practice together. They are playing against well established teams. Franklin was their dominant hitter. If she cannot return, it will be tough. It was just announced that Sarah has sprained her ankle along with a small fracture :/
|
|