|
|
Post by vbman100 on Jun 25, 2024 19:34:03 GMT -5
Were these also staged, and “added to”&like the others So is it that these are staged and planted? Or that what Drumpf did is not illegal? What is the defense strategy here? |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Jun 25, 2024 19:39:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bobinmd on Jun 25, 2024 19:41:58 GMT -5
Were these also staged, and “added to”&like the others So is it that these are staged and planted? Or that what Drumpf did is not illegal? What is the defense strategy here? Always somebody else’s fault with the cultists. Obstruction of justice twice... has to be FBI, laptop and Hunter.🍊😂 |
|
|
|
Post by blue-footedbooby on Jun 25, 2024 19:51:59 GMT -5
Seriously.  A photo taken by Walt Nauta, an aide to Trump, included in a motion filed by special counsel Jack Smith on June 24, 2024,
showing the contents of fallen boxes stored at Mar-a-Lago spilled on the floor.
Washington — Newly revealed photographs taken by the FBI during its August 2022 search of former President Donald Trump's South Florida resort shed further light on how the former president kept keepsakes from his time in office alongside documents bearing classification markings. The photos, some of which had not been publicly released, were included as exhibits accompanying a Monday court filing from special counsel Jack Smith in the ongoing federal case against Trump in South Florida. Prosecutors have accused the former president of mishandling records containing the nation's secrets after leaving the White House in January 2021 and obstructing the Justice Department's investigation. Trump has argued that the FBI agents who executed the search warrant failed to maintain the order of the documents as they were found and did not take photos to show the sequence of records in each box containing them. The special counsel acknowledged in a May 3 filing that there were some boxes where the documents were not in the same order as they were at the time of the FBI's search. But prosecutors have contended the alterations were inconsequential to the underlying conduct Trump and his two codefendants are accused of and wrote "where precisely within a box a classified document was stored at Mar-a-Lago does not bear in any way" on the defendants' ability to properly examine evidence. Trump's legal team has claimed that the failure to keep the documents intact and the order maintained violated his due process rights. They accused prosecutors of withholding information about the records' sequence because it would undercut their claim that Trump knew classified documents were stored in the boxes alongside other personal items and willfully retained them after his presidency. Smith's team, though, argued in his latest filing that there is no basis for throwing out the charges against Trump because of a disruption of the precise order of documents seized from Mar-a-Lago. "Trump personally chose to keep documents containing some of the nation's most highly guarded secrets in cardboard boxes along with a collection of other personally chosen keepsakes of various sizes and shapes from his presidency," prosecutors on the special counsel's team said. They accused the former president of maintaining the boxes containing sensitive material in a "haphazard manner" and said the FBI agents who conducted the search "did so professionally, thoroughly, and carefully under challenging circumstances." |
|
|
|
Post by BearClause on Jun 25, 2024 20:02:07 GMT -5
So is it that these are staged and planted? Or that what Drumpf did is not illegal? What is the defense strategy here? Always somebody else’s fault with the cultists. Obstruction of justice twice... has to be FBI, laptop and Hunter.🍊😂 That Daily Mail article was more kaka from House Republicans. They're claiming that the contents were "manipulated". No. It's like other searches where the evidence is photographed and cataloged. Obviously they're going to look through the boxes. They're not required to put everything back in the boxes exactly as they were found. The important thing is that Trump had them and didn't turn them over when subpoenaed. His attorneys specifically warned him about it and there are witnesses who say that he specifically was looking to avoid turning over everything. In any case, even Judge Cannon seems to be skeptical of Trump's defense trying to supress the evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Jun 26, 2024 6:01:09 GMT -5
Nothing to see here. Just top nuclear secrets with his Diet Cokes.
|
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Jun 26, 2024 8:05:11 GMT -5
Nothing to see here. Just top nuclear secrets with his Diet Cokes. was this Joe’s garage? Tommy? |
|
|
|
Post by blue-footedbooby on Jun 26, 2024 8:58:40 GMT -5
Nothing to see here. Just top nuclear secrets with his Diet Cokes. was this Joe’s garage? Tommy? Depends, is it the one involving obstruction of justice, unlawful retention of national defense information, false statements and representations, altering, destroying, mutilating or concealing an object and etc. Or was it the one cleared by the DOJ. If it was the latter than nope. |
|
|
|
Post by bobinmd on Jun 26, 2024 9:00:47 GMT -5
was this Joe’s garage? Tommy? Depends, is it the one involving obstruction of justice, unlawful retention of national defense information, false statements and representations, altering, destroying, mutilating or concealing an object and etc. Or was it the one cleared by the DOJ. If it was the latter than nope. Boom. |
|
|
|
Post by BearClause on Jun 27, 2024 13:51:23 GMT -5
Not really a surprise, but the evidence hasn't been tossed. This was regarding whether the magistrate judge was "misled" by law enforcement when they asked for a search warrant.
thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4743684-judge-cannon-rejects-trump-claims/Judge Aileen Cannon rejected claims Thursday from former President Trump that law enforcement misled the court in order to search Mar-a-Lago but kept alive other bids by the former president seeking to limit the use of key evidence, scheduling additional hearings in the dragging case. Cannon rejected Trump’s request for a “Franks hearing” to review whether prosecutors made any false statements or omissions in crafting the warrant, determining Trump had not met the bar for additional examination. |
|
