|
|
Post by uofaGRAD on Aug 12, 2024 11:21:42 GMT -5
Final Passing Stats Skinner 2.23 (173) KP 1.98 (159) JWO 2.40 (89) Kelsey 2.23 (54) Larson 2.14 (35) Italy (Minus DOM) Sylla 2.21 (101) + 2.24 (24) Cate 2.32 (72) Moki 2.43 (48) Giovannini 2.48 (25) Brazil Nyeme 2.55 (113) + 2.23 (15) + 2.57 (14) Gabi 2.61 (80) + 2.60 (29) AC 1.82 (60) + 2.34 (25) Julia 2.36 (11) Turkey Hande 2.14 (143) Gizem 2.24 (90) Meliha 2.09 (70) + 2.17 (42) Ilkin 2.06 (49) Ebrar: 2.26 (46) giovannini im so sorry I ever doubted you |
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Aug 12, 2024 12:50:16 GMT -5
Final Passing Stats Skinner 2.23 (173) KP 1.98 (159) JWO 2.40 (89) Kelsey 2.23 (54) Larson 2.14 (35) Italy (Minus DOM) Sylla 2.21 (101) + 2.24 (24) Cate 2.32 (72) Moki 2.43 (48) Giovannini 2.48 (25) Brazil Nyeme 2.55 (113) + 2.23 (15) + 2.57 (14) Gabi 2.61 (80) + 2.60 (29) AC 1.82 (60) + 2.34 (25) Julia 2.36 (11) Turkey Hande 2.14 (143) Gizem 2.24 (90) Meliha 2.09 (70) + 2.17 (42) Ilkin 2.06 (49) Ebrar: 2.26 (46) giovannini im so sorry I ever doubted you I promise to never call her the Daroitalia ever again. |
|
|
|
Post by akinradeheaux on Aug 12, 2024 13:12:23 GMT -5
Final Passing Stats Skinner 2.23 (173) KP 1.98 (159) JWO 2.40 (89) Kelsey 2.23 (54) Larson 2.14 (35) Italy (Minus DOM) Sylla 2.21 (101) + 2.24 (24) Cate 2.32 (72) Moki 2.43 (48) Giovannini 2.48 (25) Brazil Nyeme 2.55 (113) + 2.23 (15) + 2.57 (14) Gabi 2.61 (80) + 2.60 (29) AC 1.82 (60) + 2.34 (25) Julia 2.36 (11) Turkey Hande 2.14 (143) Gizem 2.24 (90) Meliha 2.09 (70) + 2.17 (42) Ilkin 2.06 (49) Ebrar: 2.26 (46) Gonna start calling Ebrar a ball control outside. |
|
|
|
Post by uofaGRAD on Aug 12, 2024 13:28:13 GMT -5
just wait, Turkey is gonna try Vargas at outside next summer with Ebrar being a passing opposite lol
|
|
|
|
Post by metea on Aug 12, 2024 16:54:37 GMT -5
Final Passing Stats Skinner 2.23 (173) KP 1.98 (159) JWO 2.40 (89) Kelsey 2.23 (54) Larson 2.14 (35) Italy (Minus DOM) Sylla 2.21 (101) + 2.24 (24) Cate 2.32 (72) Moki 2.43 (48) Giovannini 2.48 (25) Brazil Nyeme 2.55 (113) + 2.23 (15) + 2.57 (14) Gabi 2.61 (80) + 2.60 (29) AC 1.82 (60) + 2.34 (25) Julia 2.36 (11) Turkey Hande 2.14 (143) Gizem 2.24 (90) Meliha 2.09 (70) + 2.17 (42) Ilkin 2.06 (49) Ebrar: 2.26 (46) Dear Avid, Just my curiosity. What formular are you using to get these numbers and what these numbers say? If you go with Total Succesfull Reception/Grand Total Reception for the same list, what would you get? |
|
|
|
Post by huskersoftroy on Aug 12, 2024 17:00:42 GMT -5
Final Passing Stats Skinner 2.23 (173) KP 1.98 (159) JWO 2.40 (89) Kelsey 2.23 (54) Larson 2.14 (35) Italy (Minus DOM) Sylla 2.21 (101) + 2.24 (24) Cate 2.32 (72) Moki 2.43 (48) Giovannini 2.48 (25) Brazil Nyeme 2.55 (113) + 2.23 (15) + 2.57 (14) Gabi 2.61 (80) + 2.60 (29) AC 1.82 (60) + 2.34 (25) Julia 2.36 (11) Turkey Hande 2.14 (143) Gizem 2.24 (90) Meliha 2.09 (70) + 2.17 (42) Ilkin 2.06 (49) Ebrar: 2.26 (46) Gonna start calling Ebrar a ball control outside. I’m kind of gagged at her numbers ngl |
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Aug 12, 2024 17:02:52 GMT -5
Dear Avid, Just my curiosity. What formular are you using to get these numbers and what these numbers say? If you go with Total Succesfull Reception/Grand Total Reception for the same list, what would you get? its something the Americans use. Passes are graded on a scale of 0-3. 0 being error, 1 being bad, 2 being okay, 3 being good/perfect (or something along those lines) and then averaged. Given the weight to errors, the higher the number, the less likely this passer is to make errors. If you want positive pass %, for Turkey Hande 57.4% Gizem 58.9% Meliha 50% + 52.4% (i dont want to do the math to average them together) Ilkin 53.1% Derya 23.9% (Derya was 1.61, I forgot to include her) Ebrar 54.2% |
|
|
|
Post by akinradeheaux on Aug 12, 2024 17:05:36 GMT -5
Dear Avid, Just my curiosity. What formular are you using to get these numbers and what these numbers say? If you go with Total Succesfull Reception/Grand Total Reception for the same list, what would you get? its something the Americans use. Passes are graded on a scale of 0-3. 0 being error, 1 being bad, 2 being okay, 3 being good/perfect (or something along those lines) and then averaged. Given the weight to errors, the higher the number, the less likely this passer is to make errors. If you want positive pass %, for Turkey Hande 57.4% Gizem 58.9% Meliha 50% + 52.4% (i dont want to do the math to average them together) Ilkin 53.1% Derya 23.9% (Derya was 1.61, I forgot to include her) Ebrar 54.2% I know Tugba is somewhere out there cackling. |
|
|
|
Post by happybyte on Aug 12, 2024 18:12:06 GMT -5
its something the Americans use. Passes are graded on a scale of 0-3. 0 being error, 1 being bad, 2 being okay, 3 being good/perfect (or something along those lines) and then averaged. Given the weight to errors, the higher the number, the less likely this passer is to make errors. If you want positive pass %, for Turkey Hande 57.4% Gizem 58.9% Meliha 50% + 52.4% (i dont want to do the math to average them together) Ilkin 53.1% Derya 23.9% (Derya was 1.61, I forgot to include her) Ebrar 54.2% I know Tugba is somewhere out there cackling. Tugba would not matter anyway Ebrar got her role wrong tho Santa lookin at you!.. |
|
|
|
Post by metea on Aug 12, 2024 18:33:40 GMT -5
Dear Avid, Just my curiosity. What formular are you using to get these numbers and what these numbers say? If you go with Total Succesfull Reception/Grand Total Reception for the same list, what would you get? its something the Americans use. Passes are graded on a scale of 0-3. 0 being error, 1 being bad, 2 being okay, 3 being good/perfect (or something along those lines) and then averaged. Given the weight to errors, the higher the number, the less likely this passer is to make errors. If you want positive pass %, for Turkey Hande 57.4% Gizem 58.9% Meliha 50% + 52.4% (i dont want to do the math to average them together) Ilkin 53.1% Derya 23.9% (Derya was 1.61, I forgot to include her) Ebrar 54.2% Thanks Avid. I got it. On the other hand, the international numbers (calculation method) and official site of Olympics, says different and here it is. Hande 52.24% (73/140) and you can cross check from the official site of Olympics Gizem 48.86% (43/88) Meliha 51.82% (57/110) İlkin 56.25% (27/48) Derya 36.36% (16/44) Ebrar 40.82% (20/49) The reason of having Hande's reception performance only, from Turkish NT, could be due to the limitation of at least 60 succesful passes and higher. Looking at your international numbers could make me think that, I was watching another team. Summary; Hande achieved a fair overall performance but still lower than expected, two matches below her overall performance and one match against Italy at the semis, pathetic with 33.33%. Gizem really under-performed which was not expected at all but very good at digs Meliha was really solid at passing but except one match against China, not good at attack as expected İlkin played one full match against Dominican Republic and tried to contribute as a sub at the back line due to her injuries. Derya was the worst at reception but was fine at attack. Ebrar was really bad in every area. This whole summer proved that, she can be a good OPP, but trying to create an OH within a couple of months was a failure. Sad for her but still we need her. Every user might think differently but this is what I have observed and assessed. |
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Aug 12, 2024 18:37:17 GMT -5
its something the Americans use. Passes are graded on a scale of 0-3. 0 being error, 1 being bad, 2 being okay, 3 being good/perfect (or something along those lines) and then averaged. Given the weight to errors, the higher the number, the less likely this passer is to make errors. Thanks Avid. I got it. On the other hand, the international numbers (calculation method) and official site of Olympics, says different and here it is. Looking at your international numbers could make me think that, I was watching another team. yea, passing stats are inherently subjective, so they're always going to be a bit different, esp if the statisticians arent the same. |
|
|
|
Post by metea on Aug 12, 2024 18:50:18 GMT -5
Thanks Avid. I got it. On the other hand, the international numbers (calculation method) and official site of Olympics, says different and here it is. Looking at your international numbers could make me think that, I was watching another team. yea, passing stats are inherently subjective, so they're always going to be a bit different, esp if the statisticians arent the same. That is true but at least there should be an official source to rely on. Correct? |
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Aug 12, 2024 18:56:45 GMT -5
yea, passing stats are inherently subjective, so they're always going to be a bit different, esp if the statisticians arent the same. That is true but at least there should be an official source to rely on. Correct? sure, you can use the Olympic stats. Im not. There's plenty of inaccuracies within them, especially blocking stats. |
|
|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Aug 12, 2024 20:16:34 GMT -5
That is true but at least there should be an official source to rely on. Correct? sure, you can use the Olympic stats. Im not. There's plenty of inaccuracies within them, especially blocking stats. But their dig numbers are spot on! (My Annie agenda lives on!!) |
|
|
|
Post by mberlanda on Aug 12, 2024 21:22:38 GMT -5
just wait, Turkey is gonna try Vargas at outside next summer with Ebrar being a passing opposite lol Do they copy my ideas for Egonu and Antropova?  |
|
