Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2006 19:30:46 GMT -5
Minnesota should be 4 in RKPI instead of 7 (but I ain't doing no more proofreading, Mr. G).  |
|
|
|
Post by Gorf on Nov 28, 2006 19:47:56 GMT -5
Ain't doin no more... hmmm... A double negative. I'll be expecting the results of your continued proofreading shortly Mr. p. |
|
|
|
Post by gogophers on Nov 29, 2006 4:00:05 GMT -5
Small correction to SaltnPepper's very interesting data extraction: Minnesota's highest ranking possible second rounder (St. John's) is rated 51 by Pablo. The 24 ranking shown is per RKPI
|
|
|
|
Post by FloridaPerson on Nov 29, 2006 6:25:06 GMT -5
Oops. Yeah, I meant median and not mean.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Bofa on the Sofa on Nov 29, 2006 9:48:19 GMT -5
Here is the Pablo take on the regionals and sub-regionals. I used my "conference comparison" and "strength-of-schedule" approach to compare them. Recall that this basically breaks it down by comparing each team head-to-head. Having good teams helps, but only so much, and depth is also important. Having 1 great team and three lousy ones is not as good as 4 decent teams (just have to all be better than lousy).
The subregionals come out like thus, from strongest to weakest
1) Cal Poly
(2 - 4 are all very, very close)
2) LBSU
3) Stanford
4) Colorado
5) UCLA
6) Wisconsin
7) USC
8) Louisville
9) Tennessee (8 and 9 are close)
10) Nebraska
11) Purdue
12) Arkansas
13) Florida
14) Texas
15) Penn St
16) Albany
The difference between 15 and 16 is basically the difference between Penn St and Minnesota, with Penn St slightly ahead
Regionals
1 and 2 are very close, but in the end, the Texas regional comes out slightly ahead
1) Texas
2) Hawaii
3) Washington
4) Florida
|
|
