|
Post by cbrown1709 on Feb 1, 2007 3:04:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by IdahoBoy on Feb 1, 2007 14:33:30 GMT -5
I think Stanford should get all the players they want. BROWN-NOSER...... You would think with recruiting the top talent every year they should win the National Championship every year ? What happened? Dude... Nebraska isn't any better with their recruit situation and Stanford got second at Nebraska... I dunno... just luck?
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 1, 2007 23:16:16 GMT -5
Dude.....like...are you..like...in high school? The point is...with every top recruit going to Stanford shouldn't they be in the national championship year after year.....dude? I would say other teams that accomplish winning the championship have achieved a far greater task Wouldn't you ?
|
|
|
Post by Tiruray2004 on Feb 2, 2007 1:51:06 GMT -5
BROWN-NOSER...... You would think with recruiting the top talent every year they should win the National Championship every year ? What happened? Dude... Nebraska isn't any better with their recruit situation and Stanford got second at Nebraska... I dunno... just luck? Excuse him IB, they've got top talent at Nebraska but they only won 3 so far in the history of the NCAA! And look, Pavan only got her NCAA ring her junior year!
|
|
|
Post by Tiruray2004 on Feb 2, 2007 1:55:05 GMT -5
Dude.....like...are you..like...in high school? The point is...with every top recruit going to Stanford shouldn't they be in the national championship year after year.....dude? I would say other teams that accomplish winning the championship have achieved a far greater task Wouldn't you ? Stanford has won 6 championships, has been in the finals and lost quite a few in the champiobships, has been in the final 4 a bunch of times. Nebraska doesn;t even come close to these accomplishments.
|
|
|
Post by kolohekeiki on Feb 2, 2007 5:09:50 GMT -5
Talent always doesn't equal success...jus because Stanford gets all the top recruits it doesn't mean they should be winning year in and year out...jus because they have the top talent doesn't mean anything...if those recruits or "top talent" doesn't pan out how they are suppose to or if they can't play together as a team because they all want the glory then there is no way Stanford will get the national championship...but yeah if they can work together as a team then definitely they should be winning every year...but jus because they get the recruits every years it doesn't automatically mean they should be winning every year!
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 2, 2007 9:22:05 GMT -5
but it does increase the chances of winning a championship....correct? With the recruits they have gotten in the last several decades I would say that they should have won," at least," 6 championships. In other words....other teams winning the championship is a far greater accomplishment. Brag on Stanford all you want. We all know that they had a much easier road.
|
|
|
Post by kolohekeiki on Feb 2, 2007 13:19:18 GMT -5
yeah sure it does increase their chances of winning a national championship, but jus because they have the top talent it doesn't mean they should win every year...these girls need to know how to play as a team and not individuals...if they play as a team then yeah they should dominate, but if they play as individuals they won't win because volleyball is a team sport not an individual sport.
|
|
|
Post by IdahoBoy on Feb 2, 2007 14:40:49 GMT -5
Dude.....like...are you..like...in high school? The point is...with every top recruit going to Stanford shouldn't they be in the national championship year after year.....dude? I would say other teams that accomplish winning the championship have achieved a far greater task Wouldn't you ? For you, wrigley...
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on Feb 2, 2007 15:32:43 GMT -5
Dude.....like...are you..like...in high school? The point is...with every top recruit going to Stanford shouldn't they be in the national championship year after year.....dude? I would say other teams that accomplish winning the championship have achieved a far greater task Wouldn't you ? For you, wrigley... The 8 ball would be more approporiate.
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on Feb 2, 2007 15:33:25 GMT -5
Dude.....like...are you..like...in high school? The point is...with every top recruit going to Stanford shouldn't they be in the national championship year after year.....dude? I would say other teams that accomplish winning the championship have achieved a far greater task Wouldn't you ? Big Egos and chemistry.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Feb 3, 2007 1:40:56 GMT -5
Dude.....like...are you..like...in high school? The point is...with every top recruit going to Stanford shouldn't they be in the national championship year after year.....dude? I would say other teams that accomplish winning the championship have achieved a far greater task Wouldn't you ? For you, wrigley... You better keep it..You need all the extra's balls you can get.
|
|
|
Post by IdahoBoy on Feb 3, 2007 4:49:20 GMT -5
You better keep it..You need all the extra's balls you can get. I'm not the one living in a place where they freeze off...
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Feb 3, 2007 10:41:45 GMT -5
LOL..... You got me there !
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Feb 3, 2007 13:25:55 GMT -5
|
|