|
Post by redincolorado on Apr 28, 2007 21:40:08 GMT -5
Why are coaches forbidden to comment on walk ons? What is the logic behind this decision?
|
|
|
Post by BearClause on Apr 28, 2007 23:21:46 GMT -5
I don't get the question. There are conditions where a coach can comment about walk-ons.
A coach can make public comments about walk-ons once they're on a team. A coach can talk about commited recruits once they've returned a National Letter of Intent (requires a scholarship offer) or when they've signed and returned a written offer of admission and/or scholarship offer. Obviously the NLI doesn't apply to walk-ons, but I have heard of coaches commenting on the future contributions of walk-ons once the latter has occured.
|
|
|
Post by chiwoj85 on Apr 29, 2007 12:47:56 GMT -5
I understand what red is saying. An example I have, it's not volleyball, but a walk-on situation. Michael Jordan's son, Jeffrey, is walking on at the University of Illinois instead of accepting a scholarship to Valpo. Coach Weber, however, said that he can't comment on walk-ons until they are officially enrolled in school. Is there a difference b/w volleyball and basketball?
|
|
|
Post by BearClause on Apr 29, 2007 13:13:38 GMT -5
I understand what red is saying. An example I have, it's not volleyball, but a walk-on situation. Michael Jordan's son, Jeffrey, is walking on at the University of Illinois instead of accepting a scholarship to Valpo. Coach Weber, however, said that he can't comment on walk-ons until they are officially enrolled in school. Is there a difference b/w volleyball and basketball? 13.10.2 Comments Before Signing. Before the signing of a prospective student-athlete to a National Letter of Intent or an institution's written offer of admission and/or financial aid, a member institution may comment publicly only to the extent of confirming its recruitment of the prospective student-athlete. The institution may not comment generally about the prospective student-athlete’s ability or the contribution that the prospective student-athlete might make to the institution's team; further, the institution is precluded from commenting in any manner as to the likelihood of the prospective student-athlete's signing with that institution. Violations of this bylaw do not affect a prospective student-athlete's eligibility and are considered institutional violations per Constitution 2.8.1. (Revised: 1/14/97)
What this means is that verbal commitments can't be publicly confirmed by any member of an athletic department. The NLI signing is the typical time where comments about a recruit are first made. Of course it doesn't apply to anyone who enrolls in college (including early enrollees); that's when the definition of "prospective student-athlete" ends. Here's a late May 2006 media release commenting about Cal's Fall recruiting class. It includes the mention of three walk-on players who obviously hadn't enrolled yet, but had returned signed offers of written admission. calbears.cstv.com/sports/w-volley/spec-rel/053106aaa.html
|
|
|
Post by ladeda on Apr 29, 2007 14:17:51 GMT -5
Why are coaches forbidden to comment on walk ons? What is the logic behind this decision? No comment
|
|
|
Post by BearClause on May 9, 2007 18:26:08 GMT -5
|
|