|
Post by huskervbfan on Sept 14, 2007 16:12:44 GMT -5
Anyone want to bet that this doesn't happen ? ;D
|
|
|
Post by IdahoBoy on Sept 14, 2007 16:13:18 GMT -5
SHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEESH!
I was like. HowHatwhenwhy!?
|
|
|
Post by huskervbfan on Sept 14, 2007 16:20:20 GMT -5
Is this about the biggest mismatch ever scheduled? Can anyone think of a bigger Pablo difference that #2 to #259?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2007 16:24:54 GMT -5
#1 against #259?
|
|
|
Post by jgrout on Sept 14, 2007 16:25:10 GMT -5
Stanford wasn't going to Happy Valley, Penn State wasn't coming out here, so they had to find common ground, and this was it. The main difference between this tournament and last year's Happy valley sub-regional is that this one isn't Penn State and three patsies...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2007 16:26:45 GMT -5
wait a sec. St. Johns is no patsy. No saint either.
|
|
|
Post by jgrout on Sept 14, 2007 16:27:45 GMT -5
That was Minnesota. I got it right the first time... it was in Happy Valley. I suppose Hofstra isn't a patsy, but I doubt that the Lions broke much of a sweat against them.
|
|
|
Post by OverAndUnder on Sept 14, 2007 19:44:32 GMT -5
Stanford wasn't going to Happy Valley, Penn State wasn't coming out here, so they had to find common ground, and this was it. The main difference between this tournament and last year's Happy valley sub-regional is that this one isn't Penn State and three patsies... Surely they could get more interest in the match if instead it were billed as "the Penn State women's volleyball team and three pasties". Is that better? ;D
|
|
|
Post by stillcrazy on Sept 14, 2007 20:24:54 GMT -5
[quote author=jgrout board=general thread=1189804364 Surely they could get more interest in the match if instead it were billed as "Penn State and three pasties" Dont' want to see Russ Rose in three pasties.
|
|
|
Post by network155 on Sept 14, 2007 20:59:35 GMT -5
Strange things are happening everywhere, this is like a new trend. I don't believe I can remember or recall any year like this year, where so many of the top teams going down and being pushed to the limit by the most unlikely of teams.
I don't believe this will affect the Cardinal's title run, but it is an unbelievable season indeed!!!
|
|
|
Post by OU-OhYeah! on Sept 14, 2007 21:12:18 GMT -5
Dont' want to see Russ Rose in three pasties. I thought the thread about good looking Big Ten coaches died!
|
|
|
Post by IdahoBoy on Sept 14, 2007 21:18:30 GMT -5
Is this about the biggest mismatch ever scheduled? Can anyone think of a bigger Pablo difference that #2 to #259? Seems like I recall FAMU having a number of mismatch Pablo matches in conference a few years ago. I believe they had a top 10 Pablo score, and their conference average was right at 300.
|
|
|
Post by huskervbfan on Sept 14, 2007 22:38:09 GMT -5
That my have been the year they beat Nebraska in the Coliseum
|
|
|
Post by The Bofa on the Sofa on Sept 14, 2007 23:28:55 GMT -5
Is this about the biggest mismatch ever scheduled? Can anyone think of a bigger Pablo difference that #2 to #259? Stanford is #3, btw. Washington/UNF was #5 vs #277. In ranking terms, it was bigger. In ratings terms, it was just a tad bigger.
|
|
|
Post by The Bofa on the Sofa on Sept 14, 2007 23:31:13 GMT -5
Is this about the biggest mismatch ever scheduled? Can anyone think of a bigger Pablo difference that #2 to #259? Seems like I recall FAMU having a number of mismatch Pablo matches in conference a few years ago. I believe they had a top 10 Pablo score, and their conference average was right at 300. That was before I started doing the mixed Pablo rankings, which do a better job of tempering in the schedule strength. In points only, FAMU had the "early season schedule bias" all season because they never played anything meaningful after the non-conference part.
|
|