|
|
Post by bugaboo on Sept 28, 2007 16:48:13 GMT -5
My prediction:
A sweep by Stanford
30-26, 30-24, 30-27
|
|
|
|
Post by ersatzhusker on Sept 28, 2007 16:50:18 GMT -5
My prediction: A sweep by Stanford 30-26, 30-24, 30-27 You're being too conservative. If UCLA scores 25 points, I'd be surprised. |
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on Sept 28, 2007 16:57:33 GMT -5
My prediction: A sweep by Stanford 30-26, 30-24, 30-27 You're being too conservative. If UCLA scores 25 points, I'd be surprised. I do not know which way to go on this......a 3-0 wipe-out by Stanford or a hard 4-1 struggle going Stanford's way. |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 28, 2007 17:10:25 GMT -5
You're being too conservative. If UCLA scores 25 points, I'd be surprised. I do not know which way to go on this......a 3-0 wipe-out by Stanford or a hard 4-1 struggle going Stanford's way. I know this might sound crazy but for some reason it goes 5 sets, I'd give the edge to UCLA... |
|
|
|
Post by jgrout on Sept 28, 2007 17:15:13 GMT -5
You're being too conservative. If UCLA scores 25 points, I'd be surprised. I do not know which way to go on this......a 3-0 wipe-out by Stanford or a hard 4-1 struggle going Stanford's way. Stanford didn't fuss too much over 'SC's getting a four-contact attack for a kill in Game 3. If the up official asked Stanford to keep playing tonight after they'd won three games, the very least one could expect is that they would continue the match under protest! P.S. In last year's match, Coach Banachowski's assistants worked the down official more than any other assistants I'd ever seen. I'll be watching to see how this year's rule change (limiting contact with the down official to one coach) will affect them. Hmmm... how would one implement a technical foul in volleyball?  |
|
|
|
Post by sideoutnow on Sept 28, 2007 17:20:28 GMT -5
The scores will get progressively closer with UCLA taking Game 3. But Stanford will win it in 4.
|
|
|
|
Post by P10lurker on Sept 28, 2007 17:55:45 GMT -5
After watching last night, I hate to say this…Stanford will exploit UCLA’s weakness like Cal did but Stanford will not let UCLA back into the match. As much as I want UCLA to win I think the advantage goes to Stanford.
|
|
|
|
Post by OverAndUnder on Sept 28, 2007 19:25:06 GMT -5
Stanford in 3, but one of the games is 30-28.
|
|
|
|
Post by ugopher on Sept 28, 2007 22:33:42 GMT -5
UCLA up 23-18 in G3. Stanford up 2-0 in games.
Barboza appears to be struggling.
|
|
|
|
Post by OverAndUnder on Sept 28, 2007 22:43:30 GMT -5
Stanford in 3, but one of the games is 30-28. Damn I missed it by one measly point. |
|
|
|
Post by archer on Sept 28, 2007 22:49:33 GMT -5
Very good prediction!
|
|
|
|
Post by ugopher on Sept 28, 2007 23:02:18 GMT -5
Stanford in 3, but one of the games is 30-28. Damn I missed it by one measly point. Could be worse. You could have missed the lottery by one measly point! |
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on Sept 29, 2007 12:57:30 GMT -5
My prediction: A sweep by Stanford 30-26, 30-24, 30-27 Can I borrow your CRYSTAL BALL? |
|
