|
|
Post by goGopherBill on May 7, 2009 19:08:33 GMT -5
From FOX news.
Obama's short list for supreme court contains a GAY WOMAN.
Why is this Wrong?
I'll defer the comments until the druids all attack me..but will counter with REAL issues..
PREPARE to lose again in debate.
Lets see who replies with common sense and historical evidence...and doesn't belittle or attack me personally ..
as if I care...
Baaaa.
|
|
|
|
Post by ladeda on May 7, 2009 19:13:31 GMT -5
Fox Noise a Republican tabloid the #1 news source for America's trailer park trash .
|
|
|
|
Post by hammer on May 7, 2009 19:37:39 GMT -5
Gopher Bill,
Be careful, Great Britain might ban you from visiting their "great" country -- just like Michael Savage.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2009 19:39:32 GMT -5
Michael Savage. What a waste of DNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by hammer on May 7, 2009 19:47:30 GMT -5
But seriously Gopher Bill, a gay women on the Supreme Court has to take a back seat to this story:
Hawaii lawmakers vote to celebrate 'Islam Day'
Associated Press - 5/7/2009 7:35:00 AM
HONOLULU - Hawaii's state Senate has overwhelmingly approved a bill to celebrate "Islam Day," despite the objections of a few lawmakers who said they didn't think the state should honor a religion connected to Sept. 11, 2001.
The resolution to proclaim Sept. 24, 2009, as Islam Day passed the Senate on a 22-3 vote Wednesday. The bill was previously passed by Hawaii's House of Representatives.
The bill recognizes what it calls "the rich religious, scientific, cultural and artistic contributions" that Islam and the Islamic world have made.
But the Senate's two Republicans argued that radical Islamists cheered the 2001 attacks. They also noted that other religions didn't have a special day honored.
The lone Democrat voting in dissent opposed it on church-state separation grounds
|
|
|
|
Post by Pirate VB Fan on May 7, 2009 20:34:03 GMT -5
Obama's short list for supreme court contains a GAY WOMAN. Actually, my understanding is that Fox is wrong (big surprise) in that the short list contains multiple lesbians. So what? |
|
|
|
Post by hammer on May 7, 2009 20:42:47 GMT -5
Obama's short list for supreme court contains a GAY WOMAN. Actually, my understanding is that Fox is wrong (big surprise) in that the short list contains multiple lesbians. So what? So you're saying there is a better chance that one will get selected. Bill is really going to love that! |
|
|
|
Post by goGopherBill on May 7, 2009 20:49:18 GMT -5
Hint #1.
The lone Democrat voting in dissent opposed it on church-state separation grounds.
So druids..is it me..Fox or the gay issue ?
Can someone be nominated to the Supreme Court bases upon sexual preference?
Oh boy/...let er rip...
|
|
|
|
Post by goGopherBill on May 7, 2009 20:49:58 GMT -5
The bill recognizes what it calls "the rich religious, scientific, cultural and artistic contributions" that Islam and the Islamic world have made.
A challenge was made by Hannnity to anyone to name 5 things in the last 500 years from this area that has benefited MANKIND.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2009 21:04:49 GMT -5
Man, there's a lot of hatred floating around on this site.
|
|
|
|
Post by chipNdink on May 8, 2009 1:23:39 GMT -5
The bill recognizes what it calls "the rich religious, scientific, cultural and artistic contributions" that Islam and the Islamic world have made. A challenge was made by Hannnity to anyone to name 5 things in the last 500 years from this area that has benefited MANKIND. Why restrict it to the last 500 years? Sounds like Hannity was purposely trying to neglect some of the greatest contributions to mankind. What if one restricted the benefits to MANKIND from Christianity to only the last 500 years? Anyway, even with the 500 year restriction, here is a sample: 1. Taj Mahal 2. Muhammad Ali 3. Cat Stevens 4. Kareem Abdul Jabbar 5. Hakeem Olajuwon 6. Abdus Salam 7. Ahmed Zewail 8. Naguib Mahfouz 9. Orhan Pamuk 10. Burj Dubai |
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on May 8, 2009 1:28:39 GMT -5
The lone Democrat voting in dissent opposed it on church-state separation grounds Good choice. I disagree with honoring any religion, Islam or otherwise. My own state has run into trouble with this issue lately, and probably wishes they had never started messing about with it. Better to just treat all religion as being toxic poison to politics, and staying away. |
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on May 8, 2009 1:31:32 GMT -5
The bill recognizes what it calls "the rich religious, scientific, cultural and artistic contributions" that Islam and the Islamic world have made. A challenge was made by Hannnity to anyone to name 5 things in the last 500 years from this area that has benefited MANKIND. Why restrict it to the last 500 years? Sounds like Hannity was purposely trying to neglect some of the greatest contributions to mankind. What if one restricted the benefits to MANKIND from Christianity to only the last 500 years? Anyway, even with the 500 year restriction, here is a sample: 1. Taj Mahal 2. Muhammad Ali 3. Cat Stevens 4. Kareem Abdul Jabbar 5. Hakeem Olajuwon 6. Abdus Salam 7. Ahmed Zewail 8. Naguib Mahfouz 9. Orhan Pamuk 10. Burj Dubai Islam definitely did not give the world Cat Stevens, any more than it gave the world Cassius Clay or Lew Alcindor. If anything it removed Cat Stevens from the world. One might claim it gave the world Yusuf Islam, however. |
|
|
|
Post by chipNdink on May 8, 2009 1:53:38 GMT -5
... Islam definitely did not give the world Cat Stevens, any more than it gave the world Cassius Clay or Lew Alcindor. If anything it removed Cat Stevens from the world. One might claim it gave the world Yusuf Islam, however. Well, by your definition then, Christianity did not give the world Jesus. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2009 9:36:06 GMT -5
Who gave the world Sean Hannity? That's what I want to know, because it, whatever it was, needs to be stopped before it gives again.
|
|
